PA Health Systems

Web Forum-style access to our favorite medical and health related Usenet groups for our customers and visitors
Not affiliated with state of Pennsylvania or any health care provider in Pennsylvania.
Registration is free! Edit your profile Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search this Forum:

ExamVouchers.com - CompTIA discount exam vouchers - save money

Sponsor: Cert21.com
Free Online practice tests



Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
 
Last Thread   Next Thread

Author
Post New Thread    
Puma



About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
When I saw the statement of """"Consciousness exists without the brain
or mind. It underlies all
existance (sic; should be 'existEnce').
Everything that exists, all manifest, relative existance  has
consciousness."""  I wonder how one could know that  consciousness
exist without the brain? and furthermore how one can state that
relative existance has consciousness?

Here there are two possibilities:

1-The claimer might think that consciousness has no definition!  They
don`t see that ( Feeling of     I-ness ) is the consciousness, Or EGO
is the consciousness..

or, The claimer might think that,

2-Consciousness has been accepted as a permenant existance without
having any feeling of ( I -ness )

If we are on the path of YOGA,,, we have to inquire, if it is possible
to have a consciousness without
having any brain? Even only brain is not enough,,, we all have to have
a complete alive body and together with its all the sense organs..Even
this is not enough, to have an open consciousness, it also requires to
have  the brain working with its all complete functions. Even more
needed,,,we also need
to have a working neuro-system..Even this is not enough,,,we also have
a healthy mind..because if mind is not healthy,,, it is possible to
have broken a consciousness into several pieces within the same body,
as it is the case in schizophrenics..

Upto now,,, no one has ever determined  a consciousness without having
all the above mentioned requirements.. I never met a stone indicating
its consciousness,,,even  plants are said and that they have no
consciousness,,,as they have no brain and no neuro-system.. (But I
personly know some plants that they have a imitative talent ..And I
have a feeling that they have  different type of
behaviors than animals.But I am not sure, if their behavors are good
enough to accept that they have a consciousnes.)

Here many times, I meet words, regarding EGO as if, it was a very bad
thing to have,,,EGO IS  our consciousness,,,EGO is the reason of our
lives,,,The unwanted part is not EGO, but its use as EGOTISM..So we
have to be very carefull,,,some claims that if, we leave our EGOS, then
we will be enlightened or we will realise God or will REALISE
ourselves!!!

Actually if we leave our EGOS we become a dead body thats it. If we
want to leave our bad habits it will not our EGOS, but it should be our
EGOTISM..

So, if any body claims that  "Consciousness exists without the brain or
mind." I certainly and openly invite him/her to prove his/her this
statement..

Puma




Old Post 10-18-06 09:34 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
Charles E Hardwidge



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
> Actually if we leave our EGOS we become a dead body thats it. If we
> want to leave our bad habits it will not our EGOS, but it should be our
> EGOTISM..
>
> So, if any body claims that  "Consciousness exists without the brain or
> mind." I certainly and openly invite him/her to prove his/her this
> statement..

I think, you've got it nailed. To some degree, I see all the hand waving
over ego and conciousness as procrastination - vague stuff that never gets
anywhere or holds anyone accountable.

Clearly, anyone who wishes to be useful and pleasant company needs to
perform. This isn't rocket science. Doing one thing well or pissing of one
less person is a start. The rest comes in time.

--
Charles E. Hardwidge




Old Post 10-18-06 09:34 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
howdydave



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)

Puma wrote:
> When I saw the statement of """"Consciousness exists without the brain
> or mind. It underlies all
> existance (sic; should be 'existEnce').
> Everything that exists, all manifest, relative existance  has
> consciousness."""  I wonder how one could know that  consciousness
> exist without the brain? and furthermore how one can state that
> relative existance has consciousness?
>
> Here there are two possibilities:
>
>  1-The claimer might think that consciousness has no definition!  They
> don`t see that ( Feeling of     I-ness ) is the consciousness, Or EGO
> is the consciousness..
>
> or, The claimer might think that,
>
>  2-Consciousness has been accepted as a permenant existance without
> having any feeling of ( I -ness )
>
> If we are on the path of YOGA,,, we have to inquire, if it is possible
> to have a consciousness without
> having any brain? Even only brain is not enough,,, we all have to have
> a complete alive body and together with its all the sense organs..Even
> this is not enough, to have an open consciousness, it also requires to
> have  the brain working with its all complete functions. Even more
> needed,,,we also need
> to have a working neuro-system..Even this is not enough,,,we also have
> a healthy mind..because if mind is not healthy,,, it is possible to
> have broken a consciousness into several pieces within the same body,
> as it is the case in schizophrenics..
>
> Upto now,,, no one has ever determined  a consciousness without having
> all the above mentioned requirements.. I never met a stone indicating
> its consciousness,,,even  plants are said and that they have no
> consciousness,,,as they have no brain and no neuro-system.. (But I
> personly know some plants that they have a imitative talent ..And I
> have a feeling that they have  different type of
> behaviors than animals.But I am not sure, if their behavors are good
> enough to accept that they have a consciousnes.)
>
> Here many times, I meet words, regarding EGO as if, it was a very bad
> thing to have,,,EGO IS  our consciousness,,,EGO is the reason of our
> lives,,,The unwanted part is not EGO, but its use as EGOTISM..So we
> have to be very carefull,,,some claims that if, we leave our EGOS, then
> we will be enlightened or we will realise God or will REALISE
> ourselves!!!
>
> Actually if we leave our EGOS we become a dead body thats it. If we
> want to leave our bad habits it will not our EGOS, but it should be our
> EGOTISM..
>
> So, if any body claims that  "Consciousness exists without the brain or
> mind." I certainly and openly invite him/her to prove his/her this
> statement..
>
> Puma

Howdy Puma!

The difference between options 1 & 2 seems
(to me) to be a matter of personal posession.

If that is the case, then the posessor is
greater than the consciousness.

For me consciousness is Unity (Yoga), not Ego.

Dave




Old Post 10-19-06 02:32 AM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
omjaroo



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)

Puma wrote:

> So, if any body claims that  "Consciousness exists without the brain or
> mind." I certainly and openly invite him/her to prove his/her this
> statement..

Puma my friend,

I'll make you a deal. You prove God doesn't exist and I will prove He
does :-)

Jared
o
^




Old Post 10-19-06 02:32 AM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
dick blister



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)

"Puma" <sesli.atbisey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161205122.507609.220390@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com..
> When I saw the statement of """"Consciousness exists without the brain
> or mind. It underlies all
> existance (sic; should be 'existEnce').
> Everything that exists, all manifest, relative existance  has
> consciousness."""  I wonder how one could know that  consciousness
> exist without the brain? and furthermore how one can state that
> relative existance has consciousness?
>
> Here there are two possibilities:
>

By experiential research. By acheiving union..By attaining Yoga.

When pure consciousness is permanently established within the very core of
our being, within the very heart of every aspect of our manifest, personal,
physical structure, there are no longer any boundaries between self and
Self. In the reality of pure consciousness, there are no labels, and nothing
to label. There is no separation or duality of self and other. There is only
Unity Consciousness or the union of Yoga..."I Am That" Pure Unbounded
Consciousness..."Thou
Art That" Pure Unbounded Consciousness... "All This Is That" Pure
Unbounded Consciousness.

> 1-The claimer might think that consciousness has no definition!  They
> don`t see that ( Feeling of     I-ness ) is the consciousness, Or EGO
> is the consciousness..

Consciousness contains all relative expression of itself as unmanifest
potential.
Ego is only a small, limited expression of the unlimited, unbounded, pure
absolute consciousness that permeates, saturates and initiates all
existEnce...
Everything that has existEnce is a manifest, material expression of
consciousness on the relative level of being.
Consciousness is selfsufficient unto itself. It is the vast ocean of pure
awareness. In its purest form, consciousness remains at rest within the
experiences of its own self ..it is simply in union within its own state of
being...I am that..Thou art that...All this is that.
When consciousness begins to flow, it expresses itself as intelligence. This
intelligence is what gives rise to all manifest creation and maintains the
relative state of being as the fulfilment of its own pure potential.

Everything that exists is an expression of consciousness to some degree.
Else it would not have the the intelligence to maintain its relative state
of being. A rock has intelligence. It knows how to be a rock. On the level
of union, everything is united on the level of consciousness. Consciousness
is the destroyer of ego...the more aware we become, the more we see the
absolute quality of "That" which permeates all existEnce. Pure consciousness
transcends boundaries of the small, personal self and opens our eyes to
truly see, cognize, know and attain union.
>
> or, The claimer might think that,
>
> 2-Consciousness has been accepted as a permenant existance without
> having any feeling of ( I -ness )
>
> If we are on the path of YOGA,,, we have to inquire, if it is possible
> to have a consciousness without
> having any brain? Even only brain is not enough,,, we all have to have
> a complete alive body and together with its all the sense organs..Even
> this is not enough, to have an open consciousness, it also requires to
> have  the brain working with its all complete functions. Even more
> needed,,,we also need
> to have a working neuro-system..Even this is not enough,,,we also have
> a healthy mind..because if mind is not healthy,,, it is possible to
> have broken a consciousness into several pieces within the same body,
> as it is the case in schizophrenics..
Looking at consciousness from the limited perspective of personal ego
identity, we can only see the expressions of consciousness that are within
the boundaries of our limited awareness. If we try to measure it or identify
it from the level of intellect, we come up short because we are using a lens
that can not see into the infinite, absolute nature of consciousness.
We must refine our perceptive ability, our cognitive awareness and our
experiential capacity to be able to open ourselves to become intuned within
the majesty of consciousness just as the early Vedic seers and rishis were
able to do. We have developed all kinds of paths and techniques to bring us
to this state of union. Experiencing this refined state of cosmic union, we
can see that same quality of being within all things. We can see beyond the
gross, relative state of being and know "That" which all this is.

>
> Upto now,,, no one has ever determined  a consciousness without having
> all the above mentioned requirements.. I never met a stone indicating
> its consciousness,,,even  plants are said and that they have no
> consciousness,,,as they have no brain and no neuro-system.. (But I
> personly know some plants that they have a imitative talent ..And I
> have a feeling that they have  different type of
> behaviors than animals.But I am not sure, if their behavors are good
> enough to accept that they have a consciousnes.)
>
> Here many times, I meet words, regarding EGO as if, it was a very bad
> thing to have,,,EGO IS  our consciousness,,,EGO is the reason of our
> lives,,,The unwanted part is not EGO, but its use as EGOTISM..So we
> have to be very carefull,,,some claims that if, we leave our EGOS, then
> we will be enlightened or we will realise God or will REALISE
> ourselves!!!
>
> Actually if we leave our EGOS we become a dead body thats it. If we
> want to leave our bad habits it will not our EGOS, but it should be our
> EGOTISM..
>
> So, if any body claims that  "Consciousness exists without the brain or
> mind." I certainly and openly invite him/her to prove his/her this
> statement..
>
> Puma
>





Old Post 10-19-06 07:30 AM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
Stu



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
On 2006-10-18 13:58:42 -0700, "Puma" <sesli.atbisey@gmail.com> said:

>
>
> Upto now,,, no one has ever determined  a consciousness without having
> all the above mentioned requirements.. I never met a stone indicating
> its consciousness,,,

Imagine a nuclear explosion expelling a huge round rock.  With time
life emanates from this rock.

That rock is earth.  It has given birth to us.  Isn't that a form of
consciousness?  Isn't there something intelligent working when beings
spring from a rock?

> even  plants are said and that they have no
> consciousness,,,

Yet somehow plants manage to react to the environment, interact,
provide their part in the circle of life.  Plants grow and evolve.
They take part in moving towards greater diversity, greater complexity
and greater integration.

Could we not define consciousness as having this attribute of moving
towards greater diversity, greater complexity and greater integration?
Doesn't consciousness leave a footprint of intelligence?  What are
these reoccurring patterns we see in nature, form crystals to the
complex coding of genetic materials?


> as they have no brain and no neuro-system.. (But I
> personly know some plants that they have a imitative talent ..And I
> have a feeling that they have  different type of
> behaviors than animals.But I am not sure, if their behavors are good
> enough to accept that they have a consciousnes

Rocks, plants and animals may not possess self consciousness.  But in
the scheme of things they represent a continuum of entities that show
an increasing level of consciousness.  From the simplicity of the
quark, to the atom, molecule, cell, plant, animal, human.  All moving
towards greater diversity, greater complexity and greater integration.

This notion is only about 100 years old.  We are the first humans on
this planet to understand where we stand and what our potential is
along this expansion of consciousness.

Do you want to deny it?  Or explore its potential?
--
~Stu




Old Post 10-19-06 07:30 AM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
Puma



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
omjaroo wrote:
> Puma wrote:
> 
>
> Puma my friend,
>
> I'll make you a deal. You prove God doesn't exist and I will prove He
> does :-)
>
> Jared
> o
> ^

Jared,

All I am saying is about consciousness,,,not about a male God.. I
never said if God exists or not!

I am telling that all the sciences (biology, psychology,
psychiatry,neurology,brain sciences,cognitive sciences,medicine) accept
and defines consciousness as a function of brain..
Consciousness exists only in living human beings and in some  animals.
Stones and other commodities has no such thing as they have no brain..

Please kindly concentrate your attention on what I am saying,,,not on
the aspects that I am not talking about.

With compassion,

Puma




Old Post 10-19-06 09:27 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
Puma



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
dick blister wrote:
> "Puma" <sesli.atbisey@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1161205122.507609.220390@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com.. 
>
> By experiential research. By acheiving union..By attaining Yoga.

Which Research___please state with scientific documants..

Union ,,,SMADHI is not same in everybody!!!

Who attains yoga? OUR EGOS ATTAIN YOGA please be aware of it!!!
>
> When pure consciousness is permanently established within the very core of
> our being, within the very heart of every aspect of our manifest, personal
,
> physical structure, there are no longer any boundaries between self and
> Self.

What you are trying to express is SAMADHI as told on the yoga sutras..

But samadhi is not same for every body,,,it changes from person  to
person..
Even to reach samadhi it requires an EGO..

In order to reach samadhi one needs an EGO first,,if there is no EGO,
NO SAMADHI is possible..Please  be factual..


In the reality of pure consciousness, there are no labels, and nothing
> to label. There is no separation or duality of self and other. There is on
ly
> Unity Consciousness or the union of Yoga..."I Am That" Pure Unbounded
> Consciousness..."Thou
> Art That" Pure Unbounded Consciousness... "All This Is That" Pure
> Unbounded Consciousness.

You are talking with the same way vedas do..Please use your own
wisdom!!! As ii know all these hindu views..Don`t be a parrotical
singer..Say something that we have not heard!!!
> 
>
> Consciousness contains all relative expression of itself as unmanifest
> potential.

Who says so or where did you learn these? SUPPORTING SCIENTIFIC
Documents required.


> Ego is only a small, limited expression of the unlimited, unbounded, pure
> absolute consciousness that permeates, saturates and initiates all
> existEnce...

Without EGO there is nothing,,NO CONCIOUSNESS, NO PURE CONSCIOUSNESS
either!


> Everything that has existEnce is a manifest, material expression of
> consciousness on the relative level of being.

It is VEDAS` imaginary depiction! I want your view if you have any!!!

> Consciousness is selfsufficient unto itself. It is the vast ocean of pure
> awareness.

How did you reach to this info? By your EGO,,,So everything depends on
your EGO!



> experiences of its own self ..it is simply in union within its own state 
of
> being...I am that..Thou art that...All this is that.
> When consciousness begins to flow, it expresses itself as intelligence. Th
is
> intelligence is what gives rise to all manifest creation

How do you know that CREATION really exist? What makes you so  definite
on this?What is your proof? If a creation exist then you can not
explain how the creator was created!!!

and maintains the
> relative state of being as the fulfilment of its own pure potential.
>
> Everything that exists is an expression of consciousness to some degree.

Whose consciousness??

> Else it would not have the the intelligence to maintain its relative state
> of being. A rock has intelligence. It knows how to be a rock. On the level
> of union, everything is united on the level of consciousness. Consciousnes
s
> is the destroyer of ego..

PLEASE BE AWARE OF THAT IF YOUR EGO IS DESTRYED,,,THEN YOU WILL BE A
DEAD BODY..EGO IS THE ONE FOR YOU TO BE ALIVE DO NOT FORGET THIS
SIMPLE TRUTH..
..the more aware we become, the more we see the
> absolute quality of "That" which permeates all existEnce. Pure consciousne
ss
> transcends boundaries of the small, personal self and opens our eyes to
> truly see, cognize, know and attain union.

All these are copied from VEDAS.. Please say something new and REAL!!!
 
> Looking at consciousness from the limited perspective of personal ego
> identity, we can only see the expressions of consciousness that are within
> the boundaries of our limited awareness. If we try to measure it or identi
fy
> it from the level of intellect, we come up short because we are using a le
ns
> that can not see into the infinite, absolute nature of consciousness.

How then should we look at it to see what you call consciousness which
is a stolen object from cognitive sciences and medicine? But in reality
this pure consciousness belongs to whom you think???
> We must refine our perceptive ability, our cognitive awareness and our
> experiential capacity to be able to open ourselves to become intuned withi
n
> the majesty of consciousness just as the early Vedic seers and rishis were
> able to do.
Vedas are human words they have no other value..Rishis were able to
see what
all magic all stories,or some sort of dreams?as reincarnation type of
bullies???
We have developed all kinds of paths and techniques to bring us
> to this state of union.

There is an UNION we are all together,,, but to see this any healthy
brain can show it
this is not a problem, no need to have a samadhi either..
Experiencing this refined state of cosmic union, we
> can see that same quality of being within all things. We can see beyond th
e
> gross, relative state of being and know "That" which all this is.
>

Science also is showing to us this simple fact,,,by using our
individula brains,,OUR EGOS
are the finder..[vbcol=seagreen] 


We have to use our wisdom,,, EGO is a must for us,,,EGOTISM is the part
that gives us attachments..WE should renunciate only our egotism not
our EGOS..

Egos are our sources making us alive..Lets not be a like parrots
repeating old scriptures..
Old scriptures are also human made..But most of them have many false
informations..

CONSCIOUSNESS is defined as a human aspect by science.. We have no
right trying to
reflect this concept to God or any other SELF behind ourselves..

Consciousness is a FUNCTION OF BRAIN,,,So lets be mindful,,,lets be
awake,,,lets use our wisdom..If we know ourselves then it is good
enough for us..FIRST WE SHOULD KNOW OUR-SELVES..

With compassion,

Puma




Old Post 10-19-06 09:27 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
Puma



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)
Stu wrote:
> On 2006-10-18 13:58:42 -0700, "Puma" <sesli.atbisey@gmail.com> said:
> 
>
> Imagine a nuclear explosion expelling a huge round rock.  With time
> life emanates from this rock.
>
> That rock is earth.  It has given birth to us.  Isn't that a form of
> consciousness?  Isn't there something intelligent working when beings
> spring from a rock?
> 
>
> Yet somehow plants manage to react to the environment, interact,
> provide their part in the circle of life.  Plants grow and evolve.
> They take part in moving towards greater diversity, greater complexity
> and greater integration.
>
> Could we not define consciousness as having this attribute of moving
> towards greater diversity, greater complexity and greater integration?
> Doesn't consciousness leave a footprint of intelligence?  What are
> these reoccurring patterns we see in nature, form crystals to the
> complex coding of genetic materials?
>
> 
>
> Rocks, plants and animals may not possess self consciousness.  But in
> the scheme of things they represent a continuum of entities that show
> an increasing level of consciousness.  From the simplicity of the
> quark, to the atom, molecule, cell, plant, animal, human.  All moving
> towards greater diversity, greater complexity and greater integration.
>
> This notion is only about 100 years old.  We are the first humans on
> this planet to understand where we stand and what our potential is
> along this expansion of consciousness.
>
> Do you want to deny it?  Or explore its potential?
> --
> ~Stu


My dear Stu,


>From your poster it can be seen that you don`t try to accept what
SCIENCE is saying,,,or
you do not want to understand what I am trying to say..

Science is saying that CONSCIOUSNESS IS A FUNCTION OF BRAIN,,,now this
is a scientific reality,,,it is not an imagining explosion of any
rock!!! And it has no relation with that either..Please try to
understand what I am saying,,,Beliefs are our specially entertained
belongings..When one talks about consciousness he/she should also
accept the BRAIN..

If one talks about a super existance, say God or SELF or
whatever,,he/she SHOULD BE AWARE THAT IF  PURE CONCIOUSNESS BELONGS TO
THIS SUPERIOR EXISTANCE, then that should have a brain..In other words
I am saying that,,,you can not USE CONSCIOUSNESS which is a scientific
term, for such an SUPERIOR EXISTANCE,,,,if you do,,,then you have TO
ADMIT THAT THIS SUPERIOR EXISTANCE HAS TO HAVE A BRAIN..If it fits to
such a superior SELF! ! ! I personly feel a shame to refer it..

With compassion,

Puma




Old Post 10-19-06 09:27 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged
omjaroo



Re: About consciousness = (To have an EGO) = (feeling of - I ness)

Puma wrote:
> omjaroo wrote: 

Puma wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> All I am saying is about consciousness,,,not about a male God.. I
> never said if God exists or not!

Well, how about it. Is there God (gender neutral of course :-) or not?
>
[snip nonsense]
>
> Please kindly concentrate your attention on what I am saying,,,not on
> the aspects that I am not talking about.

Puma, are you a yogi? This is a real question, not a statement :-)

Jared
o
^




Old Post 10-19-06 09:27 PM
   Edit/Delete IP: Logged




Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
All times are GMT.
The time now is 07:51 PM.   
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Post New Thread    


Yoga archive | Real Estate forum

Featured sites

Featured site: MCSE, MCSD, CompTIA, CCNA training videos



Popular medical Forums
Diabetes forum Asthma Support Herpes Support
Arthritis forum Migrane Support Hepatitis-C support
Allergy Lyme Disease HIV AIDS Support Forum
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Politics and Medicine Pharmacy
Depression Support Depression Medications Nutrition forum


Print this thread Show a Printable Version | Email this thread Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:
 


Health Information forum archive

 
 We recommend: Database administration help | Exam Notes | Web Design forum
  Copyright 2003 - 2006 PA Health Systems  Term of Service  

Offshore web hosting by serverslease.net

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000, 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.