Hanson posts something about LASIK for a change..
What do you mean "on the contrary"?
You make is seem as if Dr. Gayton is against refractive surgery. far
from it.
Dr. Gayton does LASEK surgery which removes the tissue that would have
been the flap rather than put it back in place. To market his LASEK
technique, he attacks LASIK. Disgusting.
Furthermore.. why did he not do his own daughter's LASIK procedure?
Instead of doing it himself, he paid somebody else $4000 to do it?
Probably the daughter had it done elsewhere because she hates her own
father. then he got her in his chair to check how the procedure was
done.. he probably decided there was debris under the flap and lifted
them himelf and screwed up her procedure.
Anyway. there are thousands of LASIK surgoens on the planet.. and
there are a handful of nuts including Dr. Gayton that do LASEK
exclusively.
On 21 Jul 2006 11:55:52 -0700, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<lasikreport@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Christopher Roiland (aka "Ragnar") falsely wrote:
>
>
>To the contrary -- Dr. Gayton's own daughter was damaged by lasik.
>
>http://www.lasikfraud.com/isrs/bb_01.html
>
>"Jim, I strongly agree with you. My daughter has terrible night vision
>problems due to a 5.5 o.z.(done by another surgeon) with her approx 8.0
>pupils.
>Johnny Gayton ---"
|