I can't believe that there is any psychologist that wouldn't agree that you
are heavily in denial over your acceptance as true of something blatantly
false (brainwashing).  You are not seeing things clearly, things that are
obvious to anyone not in your position of blind acceptance. If a Newsweek
magazine was sent 1000 years into the past and re-written by someone then to
be more understandable it would turn out the same way that the Bible did.
What was going on thousands of years ago would blow your sense of your
conditioned history- what you were told to be the history of human
civilization.  Are you aware that there is physical proof that at least one
massive nuclear explosion happened on the Arabian peninsula around the time
of the Sodom and Gomorrah destruction?  Thousands of years ago there was
space travel and genetic engineering which was translated into superstitious
garbly gook in the Bible.  If you are going to take the Bible so literally I
suggest you go back to the original texts and study several DIRECT
translations, WORD FOR WORD translations and see how they WILDLY deviate
from what is passed off today to be the "word of God."

--

Jim Scannell
http://home.wi.rr.com/jscannell/Books.htm

Research: The cure for mindless sheep syndrome


"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:12bighvdh77g641@corp.supernews.com..
>
> "James Scannell" <jscannell@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:yWWsg.1595$Bh.319@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com.. 
> 
>
> James totally misses what was said, and goes into the fairy-tale of
> "changes in the text" (if he knew what went into the copying of the texts
> he would know this to be false).
>
> But people do read the *same* texts, and get entirely different messages
> from them. Most can explain their interpretations in such a matter as to
> make the listener (even if they still disagree) understand the other
> person's version of what the texts mean.. and recognize the innocence of
> the understanding..
>
> But other times, as with Azure, one knows absolutely that no one can come
> up with their claimed understanding without taking texts out of context,
> claiming they really mean this or that, without any linguistics backing up
> their claims.. mix and matching texts which have nothing to do with each
> other, and presenting them in such a way as to make it seem they are
> connected, fooling the unknowing (they who don't know enough about the
> texts to catch the flaws..) Such are called *twisted versions*, or
> *twisting the scriptures*
>
> <snipped more rant based on missing the point of what was said.>
>
> Note; Azure is aware that he was caught in the act
>
>
>

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]