hal@nospam.org wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> On 11 Jul 2006 00:18:02 -0700, tranylcypromine@gmail.com wrote:
>
> 
>
> Sure, I would.
> 
>
> I disagree.  I found Nom's website full of very useful information. Of
> course,  anyone who believes everything they find on one website is a
> fool, but the point is, anything can be CONFIRMED.  These days you can
> even get right on the drug companies sites and get the full pharm
> reports and even the results of the drug trials.  But again, key is
> confirm, confirm, confirm.  And remember, that everyone is different.
> Because information is given out for a drug that doesn't work for you,
> doesn't mean the information is wrong.  Not even psychiatric MDs fully
> understand the workings of these diseases and most of these drugs.
> Bottom line is we are all lab rats.  You take your chances even with
> your licensed MD, and you are taking just as much of a chance getting
> info of the Internet, but again, the information is all out there if
> you want to do your research.
>
> Hal
> 


Since everything can be confirmed, don't you think it's incumbent on
the owner of the website to verify and correct the information
provided?

marcia

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]