One persons faith allows him to eat anything, but the person who is weak in
faith only eats vegetables.  The person who will eat anything is not to
despisethe person who doesn't; while the person who only eats vegetables is
not to pass judgement on the one who eats anything; for God has accepted him
Romans 14:2-3


I think these verses says it all.

"-Hector-" <Melitus@Dithryrambic.net> wrote in message
news:6mami09rabrs226gi40ndn11hcgeagbbcm@4ax.com..
> On 24 Aug 2004 03:45:03 -0700, hbkta@aol.com (HB) wrote:
> 
news:<lGBWc.17206$N77.681751@news.xtra.co.nz>..[vbcol=seagreen] 
the[vbcol=seagreen] 
eyes[vbcol=seagreen] 
meat[vbcol=seagreen] 
tools[vbcol=seagreen] 
lately?[vbcol=seagreen] 
> You may have missed the point.  The contention has been that
> man by design is not a meat-eater.  It would appear that our
> evolutionary past would argue against such an assertion, if the
> Neanderthal was a genuine precursor to modern man.  Concordantly, it
> would appear that the human animal comes equipped with estimable
> hunting skills, if our primitive ancestors are any indication of our
> rapacious heritage.
>
> Playing right field with the New Harmony Neanderthals,
> Hector

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

What if someone else writes a completely different set of verses and include
s
the exact opposite view from the one you quoted (correctly or not).  Might
these new verses also "say it all"?

--
News Guy


"Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message
news:kYIWc.5920$D7.2092@news-server.bigpond.net.au..
> One persons faith allows him to eat anything, but the person who is weak i
n
> faith only eats vegetables.  The person who will eat anything is not to
> despisethe person who doesn't; while the person who only eats vegetables i
s
> not to pass judgement on the one who eats anything; for God has accepted h
im
> Romans 14:2-3
>
>
> I think these verses says it all.

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

If someone can find a verse in which implies that God lied about this, then
go head and post it.  FTR the version I used was Todays English Version.

"News Guy" <newsguy@mindless.com> wrote in message
news:2p1afuFfcfleU1@uni-berlin.de..
> What if someone else writes a completely different set of verses and
includes
> the exact opposite view from the one you quoted (correctly or not).  Might
> these new verses also "say it all"?
>
> --
> News Guy
>
>
> "Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message
> news:kYIWc.5920$D7.2092@news-server.bigpond.net.au.. 
in[vbcol=seagreen] 
is[vbcol=seagreen] 
him[vbcol=seagreen] 
>

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

"Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message news:<4%1Xc.7236$D7.360@news-server.bigp
ond.net.au>..
> If someone can find a verse in which implies that God lied about this, the
n
> go head and post it.  FTR the version I used was Todays English Version.
>

Duh, your quote is from Saul, not God.
Saul/Paul, an abitious Jew, who seeing his upward mobility very
limited within the Jewish community, latched onto the most likely
growth industry he could find, the budding christian cult.
Read the NT carefully and you will find many pionts of contradiction
between the gospels and saul's writings.

[vbcol=seagreen]
> "News Guy" <newsguy@mindless.com> wrote in message
> news:2p1afuFfcfleU1@uni-berlin.de.. 
>  includes 
>  in 
>  is 
>  him 

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

Paul's writings were God inspired.  That means the words he wrote, just like
the words Moses wrote in the Torah came directly from God and were written
in such a way that humans like yourself (and myself) could understand).
When someone gives a message from God, that message is not able to be
contradicted.

"HB" <hbkta@aol.com> wrote in message
news:b901e82f.0408251559.54ac60cd@posting.google.com..
> "Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message
news:<4%1Xc.7236$D7.360@news-server.bigpond.net.au>..[vbcol=seagreen] 
then[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
> Duh, your quote is from Saul, not God.
> Saul/Paul, an abitious Jew, who seeing his upward mobility very
> limited within the Jewish community, latched onto the most likely
> growth industry he could find, the budding christian cult.
> Read the NT carefully and you will find many pionts of contradiction
> between the gospels and saul's writings.
>
> 
Might[vbcol=seagreen] 
weak[vbcol=seagreen] 
to[vbcol=seagreen] 
vegetables[vbcol=seagreen] 
accepted[vbcol=seagreen] 

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

"Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message news:<jQmXc.8270$D7.1862@news-server.big
pond.net.au>..
> Paul's writings were God inspired.  That means the words he wrote, just li
ke
> the words Moses wrote in the Torah came directly from God and were written
> in such a way that humans like yourself (and myself) could understand).
> When someone gives a message from God, that message is not able to be
> contradicted.

Read the NT carefully and you will find many points of contradiction
between the gospels and saul's writings.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> "HB" <hbkta@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:b901e82f.0408251559.54ac60cd@posting.google.com.. 
>  news:<4%1Xc.7236$D7.360@news-server.bigpond.net.au>.. 
>  then 
>  includes 
>  Might 
>  weak
>  in 
>  to 
>  vegetables
>  is 
>  accepted
>  him 

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]

"Rico" <hoganrj@bigpond.net.au.au> wrote in message news:<jQmXc.8270$D7.1862@news-server.big
pond.net.au>..
> Paul's writings were God inspired.  That means the words he wrote, just li
ke
> the words Moses wrote in the Torah came directly from God and were written
> in such a way that humans like yourself (and myself) could understand).
> When someone gives a message from God, that message is not able to be
> contradicted.

Paul is the biggest hippocrite in the Bible.  You can tell from the
*LETTERS* he wrote to his cults that he is just bragging about how
tough of a servent of God he is.  He is nothing more than an egotist
and somehow his letters appealed to the church fathers who were
control freaks as well.

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]