Re: Extremely High Performances of Bach - Introduction to Bach (Johann Sebastian Bach) - {HRI 200510
"rbb" wrote..
> Once in while even Jeremy might have a point Slider.
>
> Koos is a famous person on the net.
> He operates since 1994.
> One of those who has won a kook-award, but that is not the worst.
> He is said mostly to channel dead Ron Hubbard from scientology.
> He is anti scientology but feels that he is the true heir of it.
> He is also said to have made a murderattempt on his daughter.
> Words also go that he is out from the instituut just for a few
> years now after going in for that.
> A true fullblood thetan if there has ever been one.
### - got no more time to waste on that fool jeremy any more, from my pov
his unwarranted cruelty alone permanently disqualifies him (i don't like
unrepentant muggers in any form)
didn't know about koos.. plus don't really care about someone's
history etc (people can always change, it's not wrong to give them that
chance) - i.e. in order to be fair to people one perforce has to take people
as you find them.. even to allowing them several chances to get it right
>
> Well you know I am not on a mental diet like Jeremy,
> in fact I find "delusions" creative symbols and language of our right
> brain multi-interpretable and excellent tools.
### - delusions are only delusions IF you take them as real + believe/act
on them without question, whereas to act on something to 'find out' if it is
real, is actually fairly wise + reveals that the person already knows
something about the 'nature' of perception & delusion, to the point that
they always test the road in front of them with a stick for quicksand
>
> But Koos is no fun. His beliefs are convictions.
> He knows the truth, how boring can one get?
> Besides he was one of those cultbunnies for real and as we all know
> cults only catch those that lust for powers over others or are those
> that don't want to
> think for themselves.
### - and what about the 'devotees' of the world rbb? (the huge majority of
learners out there actually)
has that not been a historically proper + bona-fide path to wisdom in the
past? (i.e. the way of the devotee merely means to submit oneself to a
genuine teacher for a time in order to learn/absorb something)
plus there is always going to be people who would take advantage of this
group for their own selfish/twisted/misinformed purposes.. (note jeremy's
previous 'joke' about starting his own cults to take advantage of such
pliable, easy-going people for example, this is how it starts)
>
> By the way:
>
> Remember our conversation about that in your opinion fake- healer
> you warned me against?
> The one adjusting my AP to begin with?
> Well here is what happened:
> I had ten other treatments after that. Rifefrequencies, 4 times with
> combination of lamps.
> And to make it really shoking: I found out that he was a priest before
> he married and was deeply involved in faithhealing. Not that I mind. I
> had healers with faith before.
> No he didn't pray. at least not that I noticed. He usually just had a
> conversation with me. Mostly about his new Guru in India.
>
> Must say that for a pure placebo effect, I had to many heavy
> bodyreaction each time
> and usually two days later.
> I was stunned from that myself. I couldn't feel much during treatment.
> So first time reaction hit me by surprise I sort of thought that this
> was impossible in itself.
> I expect reactions if I feel anything.
>
> No more waterretention in my enkels , I lost weight without a problem,
> my tyroid did normalize again.
> I don't need medication. In any case not yet. And that is checked by a
> doctor.
> And my energy came back. My sleeppattern has changed too.
> I sleep every day now, after years 3 times in a week only. I also sleep
> longer. I am still a bit nightowl, but I have been that all my life.
> So what did the job I have no idea, as nothing he did was
> scientifically in the usual sense, but I am very happy with the results
> and after two months I feel confident they can last longer.
> I am not against chemicals really, but if my body can do without it, I
> prefer that.
>
> He tried to help M too, but said after one treatment he couldn't.
> He was right in that too.
### - didn't want you to be disappointed was all.. but it's an interesting
story anyway.. somehow you were convinced to heal yourself (or smile, maybe
he really IS a faith healer, and because sometimes they come in-disguise
anyway, glad to hear if your health is improved.. it worked for you, that's
all that really matters at this time, we wont make yet another cult of it
|