"De Roberts" <deroberts2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jWf8e.16267$H_5.14785@trnddc01..
>
> I have known Shez for 7 years and that's the first time I've heard her
> refered to as a zealot!!

Do you think it's an inaccurate label?

> But if that's what it takes to protect children
> from perverts who get their kicks raping babies then I
> guess I'm a zealot too.

So you don't think it's inaccurate, then.

BTW, are you restricting your definition of a child sexual abuse to the rape
of babies?

The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect defines child sexual assault
as: "Contacts or interactions between a child and an adult when the child is
being used for sexual stimulation of the perpetrator or another person when
the perpetrator or another person is in a position of power or control over
the victim."

That's a little broader than baby raping, isn't it?  You seem to be ignoring
a whole gamut of sex crimes against children.   So you're in favor of
allowing other forms of sexual abuse of children, so long as they're not
baby-rape!  Then, according to Shez's stated reasoning, you are an apologist
for pedophiles, which means you're a pedophile yourself.  No one is going to
forgive you, you know.  It's well known that you pedophiles cannot change,
so there's no hope for *you* anymore.  Give all the decent people a break
and kill yourself before you hurt even more children with your horrible,
inhuman, uncontrollable perversions.

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]