Re: The New Pope
"Tom" <dantoXSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:hc08e.7051$yq6.3981@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net..
>
> "Shez" <shez@oldcity.f2s.com> wrote in message
> news:7usSmUAzuDYCFwGn@oldcity.f2s.com..
>
> But not to child molesting, Nor was he saying that child molesting was
> unforgiveable. Both of which you falsely claimed.
But doesn't child molestation cause harm to a child? Would your Jesus
really be kind to a child molester or would he treat them the way he treated
the merchants in the temple? Lost his patience that time.
>
>
> You confused one verse for another and then misinterpreted both of them to
> mean something completely different from either the direct translation or
> any biblical scholar's interpretation. You don't seem to know the bible
> very well at all. As usual, you make a claim and then can't back it up.
>
>
> Please cite these scholars you've been looking up.
>
>
> He was the Christ. His followers, Jewish or not, are Christians.
At the time he was supposedly speaking he was speaking to the Jews, he was
supposed to be their savior.
>
>
> No, you're trying to convince yourself that I am trying to convince you
> that
> pedophilia is acceptable. I've never said any such thing.
>
>
> I've noticed your tendency to imply that anybody who argues agaist your
> false claims is a pedophile, which is just another of your pathetic
> delusions, born of your fear and hatred.
>
>
> That's OK. You make up for it by believing a whole bunch of other bizarre
> shit.
>
>
> Of course not. You are eager to dehumanize anybody who dares to disagree
> with your hateful delusions. As I've said before, it's a good thing
> you're
> so ineffectual. As delusional as you are, you'd get yourself into a lot
> of
> trouble if you had any ability whatsoever to translate the cesspool of
> your
> imagination into even a semblance of reality.
>
>
>
I'm sorry but you do come acrossed as an apologist for pedophiles. You only
discuss the criminal and never the victim.
De
|