"The Good of the Spirit" <spiiriit@goodness.org> wrote in message news:<42383cc9$1@news.comi
ndico.com.au>..
> "HB" <hbkta@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:b901e82f.0503151238.5851b35@posting.google.com..
> : I spent 10 months studying
> : things studied :
> : regular daily yoga practice
> : was 2 or 3 hours :
> : Is that good enough for credential?
>
> WAS? What now.
>
> So far sounds self indulgent.

That could be.
I have heard such comments before.
mostly from people who do not have the discipline of mind to sit for
sadhana for any prolonged period; mostly from those whose minds run to
the external world; mostly from those who consider the only valid
field of activity, of service, to be visible physical action. you
might like to re-read and think about micro-vitta

> But the classes bit sounds like

sounds like you have a really hard time acknowledging that anyone
outside of AM can do anything.

> you did something

"did" ?
still do.

- although what sort of classes, no one knows.

Lots of people know, those who were there, those who attend present
day classes

>
> : I have given classes
> : I have given classes
> : I have given classes
> : and I give classes to .
> :
> : How is that?
>
> Sounds individualistic style of life endeavour without getting others
> involved.

last I checked, only I can do my sadhana, no one else. so in that
sense it is individualistic.
"others" what "others"? Sarbam kevalam Brahma, Sarbam Brahmamayam
Jagat
"involved"? involved in what? involved how?

Report this post to a moderator

[  Post Follow-up to this message ]