Re: liquid tadalafil
"avocet" <avocet@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>The liquid is the same stuff with a different "carrier." Do you know any
>better what is in a pill (condensed powder) than in the fluid carrier?
But that's my point - I *do* know what is in certain tablets, or at least wi
th a
level assurance that I am comfortable with.
I was comparing branded generic from a known producer of legit pharmaceutica
ls,
in sealed, manufacturer branded packaging. I understand the pricing issues w
ith
the patented product, but that's not my question.
There's a world of difference (to me at least) between a branded generic and
some unidentified liquid in an unlabeled bottle.
Everyone should recognize the people distibuting this stuff are in it for on
e
thing only - the money. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but wouldn't y
ou
want as much protection as you could get?
So, what's to keep Joe Provider from deciding one day to cut in just a bit m
ore
water? Or use an unsanitary mixing tank? Or worse? So it only affects 2 out
of
100 customers. Joe's not exactly in a position to worry about getting sued.
The
economics of cutting corners from his perspective look pretty good.
Some number of years back, people stoppped buying tap beer and insisted on a
bottle, with the brewery cap still on. Why? Because the bar owner wanted to
make
a few more bucks per keg and was watering his beer.
Comparing apples to apples here: A generic tablet as I just described and an
d
unbranded liquid, what's the advantage of the liquid? Everything I've seen
suggests that there is no difference in pricing, so that can't be it.
|