|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > September 2006 > Re: Something all the malcontent idiots such as Ace, Hanson, and
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Something all the malcontent idiots such as Ace, Hanson, and
|
|
|
| Ragnar schreef:
> I would suggest you spend your time responding to the malcontents. By
> responding to me, you are just playing into their hands.
You and some of your opponents are two of a kind.
Simply said, you refuse to accept that LASIK is not always perfect and
your opponents refuse to accept many people who undergo LASIK are satisfied.
Both sides have there extremists and your are among them.
>
> You keep mentioning "layman talk". Everyone in this newsgroup is a
> layman (or less).
I have not thought about the (or less) part, now you mentioned it does
this point in your direction?
Using $10 words to impress people is a no-no.
To impress layman (or less) I agree, feel free to say no-no when you
read words you did not understand.
The
> malcontents can't even accept the most fundamental concepts, so it is
> futille to try and get technical with them.
The same goes for Ragnar.
In fact, often it is more
> useful to be perfectly blunt.
I have noticed, I read your comments.
Glenn has frequently made the mistake
> of giving the malcontents far more credit than they deserve by
> responding to them in a civil and respectful way.
I appreciate the kind of language Glenn is using, in contents we may differ.
After awhile, it
> becomes obvious that there are a few people who don't deserve any
> meaningful response other than to point out and remind people that the
> person is an idiot or as Serebel calls them "retards".
TMHO you are one of them as your soul brother ACE is.
Both to fanatic and narrow minded.
The
> malcontents are actually worse than retards. True retarded people are
> incapable of deceiving anybody.
Then according to the above try a look in the mirror.
On second thought... Serebel might be
> right in referring to Ace as a retard.
Even on first thought.
>
> I see that at the end of your response.. you say you have a better
> alternative to vision correction than lasik, but you didn't mention
> what that alternative is. There isn't one.. so don't even bother
> replying. Just please refrain from making statements like "there is a
> better alternative" without specifying what that might be.
This is what you asked[vbcol=seagreen]
This is my response.[vbcol=seagreen]
Who was asking?
You are the one who refused to go "pissing" on these issues.
On the other hand, you are telling fairy tails here because you have not
the slightest idea what your talking about when it comes to even the
most simple eyecare issues.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
Neither pro, nor anti LASEK,LASIK, PRK etc.
|
| |
|
|