|
|
knowthedirt@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Actually, LASIK almost always reduces visual quality as compared with
> glasses or contact lenses. What's miraculous is that doctors who took
> an oatho to 'first do no harm' are still performing this procedure on
> healthy eyes.
>
>
> There is no such thing as a 'good LASIK result' as the cornea is
> irreparably harmed by the procedure. Bad surgeons ARE more likely to
> completely disable a patient, as opposed to just producing somewhat
> poorer visual quality which is more typical.
>
> Why hasn't someone come forward with pre and post-op wavescans showing
> that wavefront retreatment actually WORKED and lowered the higher order
> aberrations in previously unoperated eyes? Why hasn't someone come
> forward? Because wavefront treatments are a HOAX and they induce higher
> order aberrations (corneal distortions) in patients' eyes. It is
> nothing short of criminal that this practice continues.
>
> Even the so-called 'best' surgeons have done serious harm to patients'
> vision.
Those facts are what I have learned over the years. To put it short,
lasik damages every eye.
Ragnar and Serebel will rationalize all this. Ragnar even goes to say
that HOAs are induced on purpose to correct vision and that they dont
matter, they dont decrease vision. I suggest Ragnar walk up to every
damaged lasik patient with poor vision and tell them in their face that
they are lying and see fine.
|
|