| Ragnar 2006-08-31, 9:35 pm |
| If you are going by Glenn's figures... then at least don't
misrepresent them. He said at 6 months after surgery, 3% of LASIK
complications are unresolved. He has further mentioned that the 3%
number probably is lower now.. and that at about a year after LASIK,
the number of unresolved complications drops off considerably.
Here are your lies:
No where did he say MAJOR complications.. no where did he say 5% and
no where did he say these complications go on unresolved... and nobody
with any credibility has said the complications are 3 times that.
Why do you tell outright blatant lies? Do you think you are fooling
somebody? Frankly, you make all of the malcontents look like idiots!
On 31 Aug 2006 11:42:05 -0700, "Ace" <acemanvx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Tom Lucas:
>
>
>Glenn says major lasik complications are 3%, .5% of them unresolved. Me
>and others believe the complication rate to be triple that.
>
>
>
>She doesnt know much about lasik or what HOAs were. It is possible she
>also has a refractive error but her poor night vision is not normal,
>but testament to lasik induced HOAs
>
>
>
>
>
>Dont think she remembers. She isnt gonna bother with glasses for 20/30
>UCVA, I wouldnt either!
>
>
>
>I guess she was prepared to expect decreased vision, especially at
>night and that could be reason she didnt seem overly disapointed. She
>made the tradeoff and it was worth it for her.
>HOAs cause alot more problems than residual refractive errors. My night
>vision is better without my glasses than hers is after lasik! Granted I
>see blurry, but my quality of vision is still far better than hers.
>
>
>
>
>I guess she isnt as picky as you are. So in her case, she *did*
>eliminate dependency on glasses. She can do everything without glasses,
>even drive. Albet she has to be careful at night due to HOAs
|