|
| Ace schreef:
> Jan:
>
>
> There is, I have tried it. It works for some.
Ace, shut up, you did not have an OrthoK treatment, just wearing two
silicon soft lenses backwards on your own isn't enough to make you a
judge or a specialist of what is OrthoK.
You know absolutely nothing about OrthoK, in no way and you shall never.
You are simply a layman who THINKS he knows how to advise, but Ace
forget it, you have not the slightest idea, even on how to handle your
own vision problems.
>
>
>
>
> I discussed this with two optometrists, one said its possible to
> develop presbyopia well before the age of 40,
Yes , but you are about 20 years of age and under normal circumstances
miles away from presbyopia.
the other said it was
> *normal* and its not just me but all myopes see much better from near
> without glasses as they dont have to do the effort to accomodate!
No Ace , they (the myopics) don't see much better and I don't believe a
word of what you are trying us to believe in case of the story supposed
to be told by your optometrist.
And furthermore, switching from glasses to no glasses every time is not
that comfortable if you have a busy job and the need to see sharp at
distance and nearby frequently.
And Ace, speaking of manners, put on your glasses and try to quote
correct, the lines below are not written by me, if you copy and past
then also the name of the person who wrote it please and make clear what
is written by yourself.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
>
>
> "How many people do you need to tell you that orthoK is not going to
> work for you? No doctor is going to fit you for orthoK lenses. One
> reason for that is that you are far too much of a whining pain in the
> XXX."
>
>
> Its my money, he doesnt care if I am not happy with orthoK. I will only
> take a doctors word in the orthoK decision. I have yet to get a
> consultation for orthoK(the rgp type) and we will both decide together
> if I should go ahead or stick with glasses and wait for new technology
> to correct my vision.
>
>
> "There may be some hybrid contact lens that has a rigid center with
> soft edges. Lenses like that are so rare and so ineffective that
> there is probably only one manufacturer of them using that as a
> gimmick."
>
>
> Youd get owned by all those damaged by lasik telling you how wrong you
> are! Its far from a gimmic, it works, especially for those with damaged
> lasik eyes.
>
>
> "Ace isn't going to be happy with anything. If Jesus returned and gave
>
> Ace 20/20 vision... he would be bitching a few days later that he
> wants 20/10 vision. If he got that.. he'd demand 20/2 vision."
>
>
> Says you. My proof is I wear my -3.25 computer glasses that give me
> 20/80 distance vision most of the time. If orthoK can get me to around
> -1.5 I will be extremely happy and wont need glasses 90% of the time.
>
>
> "And, ACE, if there is anything regarding your present condition that I
>
> have wrong"
>
>
> I am not retarded like you and Serebel seem to think. Make fun all you
> want, speaks volumes about your manners.
>
|
|