| Author |
Vertigo after Lasik
|
|
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2006-08-28, 4:30 pm |
| LasikRollette, if your vertigo is due to an imbalance between the
eyes, patching one eye should reduce or eliminate the problem. Have
you tried this technique?
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Ragnar 2006-08-28, 9:26 pm |
| I know how to cure rolettes's vertigo... patch both eyes, have them
sewn shut permanently.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:02:03 GMT, Glenn - USAEyes.org
<glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote:
>LasikRollette, if your vertigo is due to an imbalance between the
>eyes, patching one eye should reduce or eliminate the problem. Have
>you tried this technique?
>
>Glenn Hagele
>Executive Director
>USAEyes.org
>Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification
>
>"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
>Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
>http://www.USAEyes.org
>http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
>I am not a doctor.
| |
| claralocks@gmail.com 2006-08-30, 4:33 pm |
|
Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
> LasikRollette, if your vertigo is due to an imbalance between the
> eyes, patching one eye should reduce or eliminate the problem. Have
> you tried this technique?
>
He'd be a great poster boy to advertise LASIK... wearing an eye patch
for his permanent LASIK-induced vertigo. Tiger Woods, move over!
| |
|
| Even Ragnar wont reccomend TLC nor LVI, two crappy lasik chains that
often do discount lasik and a bad job.
Tiger Wood's vision isnt good at night, something hes not allowed to
admit but his ex knows it. Tiger sees fine in the day golfing.
| |
| Tom Lucas 2006-08-30, 4:33 pm |
| "Ace" <acemanvx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1156952036.585042.31710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Even Ragnar wont reccomend TLC nor LVI, two crappy lasik chains that
> often do discount lasik and a bad job.
>
> Tiger Wood's vision isnt good at night, something hes not allowed to
> admit but his ex knows it. Tiger sees fine in the day golfing.
An ex-wife saying something bad about her former husband? Something he
can't admit to. Hmmmmm....
| |
|
|
Tom Lucas wrote:
> "Ace" <acemanvx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1156952036.585042.31710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> An ex-wife saying something bad about her former husband? Something he
> can't admit to. Hmmmmm....
Well Tiger Woods got paid like 2 million to endorse TLC and speak only
good about lasik. Hey I would do the same for 2 million and keep silent
on any problems!
| |
| Tom Lucas 2006-08-30, 4:33 pm |
| "Ace" <acemanvx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1156953541.502612.38950@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Tom Lucas wrote:
>
>
> Well Tiger Woods got paid like 2 million to endorse TLC and speak only
> good about lasik. Hey I would do the same for 2 million and keep
> silent
> on any problems!
He can speak as freely as he wants with the lawyers he has got. As long
as he is not lying then he can say whatever he wants about TLC and if
they want their money back then he gives it to them and sues them for
£2.5million for lost earnings and mental anguish caused by their faulty
surgery. If there was a fault, of which there is no evidence beyond a
bitter ex-wife who is trying to get damages for her own bad surgery,
then it is not bad enough to stop him playing golf - which you need damn
good eyes for.
If TLC bungled badly enough to stop him playing golf then their feet
wouldn't touch the ground.
| |
| bldegle2@comcast.net 2006-08-30, 4:33 pm |
| "Well Tiger Woods got paid like 2 million to endorse TLC and speak only
good about lasik. Hey I would do the same for 2 million and keep silent
on any problems!"
Ace,
So, you would roll the dice for 2 million (drawing from your prior
analogies/postings) and go ahead with Lasik? There is usually only two
sides of the fence, sounds to me like you would sell out to 'see' the
other side.
Shame on you.
Mr Feathers
Ace wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Tom Lucas wrote:
>
>
> Well Tiger Woods got paid like 2 million to endorse TLC and speak only
> good about lasik. Hey I would do the same for 2 million and keep silent
> on any problems!
| |
|
|
bldegle2@comcast.net wrote:
> "Well Tiger Woods got paid like 2 million to endorse TLC and speak only
>
> good about lasik. Hey I would do the same for 2 million and keep silent
>
> on any problems!"
>
>
> Ace,
>
> So, you would roll the dice for 2 million (drawing from your prior
> analogies/postings) and go ahead with Lasik? There is usually only two
> sides of the fence, sounds to me like you would sell out to 'see' the
> other side.
>
> Shame on you.
Its hypothethical and no center is gonna offer money unless I was
famous and if I were famous, I likley would already be a
multimillionare anyway and wouldnt really need another million or two.
Id only do it if I wanted to. I am assuming this is what Tiger Woods
wanted and the 2 million helped his decision to go ahead. I bet even
the malcontents would get lasik(again) for a million anyday. I would,
you definately would!
|
|
|
|