Lasik Eyes Surgery - Familiar with What's-his-horn's studies? You'll love this!

Author

Familiar with What's-his-horn's studies? You'll love this!

Trulytelling@yahoo.com

2006-07-26, 9:28 pm

http://lasikflap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2635#2635

Subject: Halloween Study by Bullhorn, Munchie, et al

During the evening of Halloween, there were many cars which traveled
through the observed neighborhood. While many cars observed the 25 MPH
speed limits and many were observed traveling under the posted speed
limit, several cars were speeding down this residential neighborhood's
poorly lit streets, with one traveling at 50 MPH.

Trick-or-treating children were observed in facial masks which many
times appeared to obstruct their vision and they were many times seen
not paying attention to their surroundings. In spite of this, no one
was killed or injured by a motor vehicle during our study. Since one
motorist first received his driver's license in 1953, he is considered
an expert at driving in dark residential neighborhoods. Despite the
fact that along with him, we observed speeds which varied from well
under the posted speed limit, up to 25 MPH over the speed limit at
night with kids trick-or-treating, and the fact that no one was injured
or killed, we can only conclude that there can be no known
contraindication to speeding at night in residential neighborhoods even
while kids are out trick-or-treating, because we have observed several
speeding cars under these conditions, with no adverse effects noted in
any case at all.

Conclusion: While the sample size was limited, statistical analysis
revealed no correlation between speed and night driving, even in the
presence of small children. Laws to reduce speed in residential
neighborhood were originally based on anecdotal reports that there may
be a danger to children. Our study shows the contrary. We believe that
is time for governments to re-think laws that limit motorists to
present residential speed limits, even at night with children present.
In spite of previous anecdotal reports, this study concludes that there
is no correlation between speed and night driving, even in the presence
of small children who are visually impaired by wearing facial masks and
not paying attention.

Editor's comments: I am going to publish this and put myself out there
as an expert witness. Something horrible could happen to any motorist
who has passed the state licensing examination, and is found by the
state licensing authorities to be qualified, who drives 50 MPH at night
through a residential neighborhood on Halloween and kills or maims a
child. I think there might be a chance of a lawsuit or even court
trial. This, of course, would be a travesty of justice that an innocent
motorist, whom the state has certified and licensed to practice
driving, would be charged or sued for this bad Halloween outcome. I
hope that this study could, in some way, prevent successful lawsuits
from parents who fully understood the dangers present when they allowed
their children to walk the streets at night in facial masks that
visually impaired them, and failed to exercise full alertness to their
surroundings to be sure not to obstruct the path of a motor vehicle.

If something is not done to prevent this growing trend of parents suing
for their childrens' bad trick-or-treat experience, automobile rates
will eventually force insurers out of the auto insurance market. We
will all suffer, as drivers cut back on the number of trips they make,
children will not get to school, and the elderly will be denied rides
to doctor visits. I urge all of you to work for liability reform to
limit the awards given to these parents by our runaway legal system.

In the meantime, I believe this study can help reverse this injustice
to our fellow motorists, who like to speed through dark streets in
their Porsches at 50 MPH on Halloween. Our biggest problem is parents
who are unwilling to assume responsibility for the risks they and their
children took, just because they did not get the Halloween miracle they
were looking for. The anecdotal incidence of childrens' death due to
automobiles on Halloween was previously believed to be very low. This
study found it to be non-existent.

I congratulate the authors of this study for their continued efforts to
subvert Halloween lawsuits.

serebel

2006-07-26, 9:28 pm

Trulytell...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I congratulate the authors of this study for their continued efforts to
> subvert Halloween lawsuits.

You would because you are fcked up in the head.

Ragnar

2006-07-27, 9:26 pm

I pity anybody who has enough time to waste to read your crap.. I
stopped after the first sentence.

On 26 Jul 2006 18:28:40 -0700, Trulytelling@yahoo.com wrote:

>http://lasikflap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2635#2635
>
>Subject: Halloween Study by Bullhorn, Munchie, et al
>
>During the evening of Halloween, there were many cars which traveled
>through the observed neighborhood. While many cars observed the 25 MPH
>speed limits and many were observed traveling under the posted speed
>limit, several cars were speeding down this residential neighborhood's
>poorly lit streets, with one traveling at 50 MPH.
>
>Trick-or-treating children were observed in facial masks which many
>times appeared to obstruct their vision and they were many times seen
>not paying attention to their surroundings. In spite of this, no one
>was killed or injured by a motor vehicle during our study. Since one
>motorist first received his driver's license in 1953, he is considered
>an expert at driving in dark residential neighborhoods. Despite the
>fact that along with him, we observed speeds which varied from well
>under the posted speed limit, up to 25 MPH over the speed limit at
>night with kids trick-or-treating, and the fact that no one was injured
>or killed, we can only conclude that there can be no known
>contraindication to speeding at night in residential neighborhoods even
>while kids are out trick-or-treating, because we have observed several
>speeding cars under these conditions, with no adverse effects noted in
>any case at all.
>
>Conclusion: While the sample size was limited, statistical analysis
>revealed no correlation between speed and night driving, even in the
>presence of small children. Laws to reduce speed in residential
>neighborhood were originally based on anecdotal reports that there may
>be a danger to children. Our study shows the contrary. We believe that
>is time for governments to re-think laws that limit motorists to
>present residential speed limits, even at night with children present.
>In spite of previous anecdotal reports, this study concludes that there
>is no correlation between speed and night driving, even in the presence
>of small children who are visually impaired by wearing facial masks and
>not paying attention.
>
>Editor's comments: I am going to publish this and put myself out there
>as an expert witness. Something horrible could happen to any motorist
>who has passed the state licensing examination, and is found by the
>state licensing authorities to be qualified, who drives 50 MPH at night
>through a residential neighborhood on Halloween and kills or maims a
>child. I think there might be a chance of a lawsuit or even court
>trial. This, of course, would be a travesty of justice that an innocent
>motorist, whom the state has certified and licensed to practice
>driving, would be charged or sued for this bad Halloween outcome. I
>hope that this study could, in some way, prevent successful lawsuits
>from parents who fully understood the dangers present when they allowed
>their children to walk the streets at night in facial masks that
>visually impaired them, and failed to exercise full alertness to their
>surroundings to be sure not to obstruct the path of a motor vehicle.
>
>If something is not done to prevent this growing trend of parents suing
>for their childrens' bad trick-or-treat experience, automobile rates
>will eventually force insurers out of the auto insurance market. We
>will all suffer, as drivers cut back on the number of trips they make,
>children will not get to school, and the elderly will be denied rides
>to doctor visits. I urge all of you to work for liability reform to
>limit the awards given to these parents by our runaway legal system.
>
>In the meantime, I believe this study can help reverse this injustice
>to our fellow motorists, who like to speed through dark streets in
>their Porsches at 50 MPH on Halloween. Our biggest problem is parents
>who are unwilling to assume responsibility for the risks they and their
>children took, just because they did not get the Halloween miracle they
>were looking for. The anecdotal incidence of childrens' death due to
>automobiles on Halloween was previously believed to be very low. This
>study found it to be non-existent.
>
>I congratulate the authors of this study for their continued efforts to
>subvert Halloween lawsuits.