|
|
Ragnar wrote:
> You are about as funny as a crutch.
Not trying to be funny. I was with a patient who was having a
transplant post-lasik, and the cornea they got for her was lousy.
Surgery had to be rescheduled, and the doc said that she'd probably be
waiting until the next motorcycle convention.
> I find it ironic that you portray yourself as the queen of
compassion.
I do?
> The only compassion you are interested in is for people to show
> compassion to you. Glenn Hagele made the mistake of showing you
> compassion when you didn't deserve any. When he didn't show you
> enough compassion, you decided to retaliate by doing everything and
> anything to destroy him.
Christopher, only my compassion for your plight has kept me from
exposing something that would embarrass you a great deal. You have
lied about me, falsely accused me of a crime, called me names and
twisted my words around for over three years, yet I have never lashed
out at you and revealed what I know of one of your deficiencies. I
could publish it here every day and you would probably slink away in
embarrassment, but I have chosen not to do so. You should stop your
lies, false accusations, and name-calling, because some day, you might
just catch me having a rough day and I might be in a foul mood, and I
might just post something about you that will upset you a great deal.
Find something or someone else other than me to talk about.
>
> I know of someone else who tried for months to show some compassion to
> the Brockovich cast of characters you made up... and that compassion
> was rewarded with an attempt to destroy the people who went to great
> lengths to try and help you.
Yeah, you know someone. Where have I heard that before?
>
> Dr. Maloney took you as a patient after you pleaded for help from your
> 9 previous surgeries.
Oh really? You think you know the story, huh? He did 3 of the
surgeries. Duh. Get your facts straight or shut up.
He sure didn't need you for a patient. As
> thanks, you have stalked,
Stalked? How is that?
>ridiculed,
Ridiculed? Again, how is that?
> and slandered the man endlessly.
The truth is not slander.
> Just a few weeks ago, you were gleefully anticipating some upcoming
> trial in which he is involved.. and invited all 3 of your nutball pals
> to join in.
I have not and don't need to issue an invitation. The details of the
case are quite shocking and the case is generating quite a bit of
interest. I just hope I find a seat because it will be a long drive
for me during gridlock time on the 405 freeway.
> I know of an optometrist you should talk to. Maybe after talking to
> him, you will decide to be his 2nd suicide case.
I'm sorry that your little brain cannot fathom the thought that vision
damaged by lasik can cause a patient so much anguish that they would
commit suicide. It has happened, more than once, and the optometrist
you are referring to is not guilty of anything other than doing what
what he has become proficient at: working at restoring the patient to
normal vision in tolerable contact lenses post-lasik. You are sick to
suggest anything otherwise. I don't know the details surrounding this
person's suicide over his post-lasik problems, but I know what it's
like to struggle to wear contact lenses with dry eyes exacerbated by
lasik, and I know what I went through when I was having multiple
surgical attempts to try to fix my right cornea, while at the same time
unravelling the details of the malpractice which occurred before,
during and after my surgery. I felt deep despair at times and I
understand why someone would want to escape it.
> Unlike Brent Hanson who seems to be intelligent other than his
> obsession with refractive surgery, you were nuts before lasik, and
> you will always be nuts, and you have no redeeming qualities.
> Brent is going to be normal after he gets his 18 months to think over
> things a bit. He might even want to consider getting into a mental
> hospital as an alternative to going to jail.
>From what I understand, Brent is not going to jail, so what are you
talking about?
|
|