| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2006-05-11, 1:26 am |
| On 10 May 2006 19:19:29 -0700, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<administrator@lasikcourt.com> wrote:
>Then, to avoid having to pay his child support, Hagele filed a Chapter
>7 bankruptcy petition...
Not only is that a lie, Hanson, it is a stupid lie. Fifteen years ago
as now, child support is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Furthermore,
all appropriately determined support has been paid in full.
Perhaps if Brent Hanson of LasikFraud.com were not so busy (allegedly)
attempting to defraud the North Carolina bankruptcy court, he would
know such facts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Petition For Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation of Brent Hanson of
LasikFraud.com
The following is a petition sent to the Bankruptcy Administrator (aka
US Trustee) for the state of North Carolina. It pretty much says it
all. A .pdf file is available at
http://www.glennhagele.com/brenthan...uptcy-fraud.pdf
The US Trustee for Hanson's bankruptcy has been assigned the
investigation and will report back to the US Bankruptcy Administrator.
See http://www.glennhagele.com/breanthanson/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael D. West
US Bankruptcy Administrator
PO Box 1828
Greensboro NC 27402
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
re: Brent A. Hanson
Chapter 13 bankruptcy case 05-82419
Filed 23 August 2005
Mr. West,
I write to inform you of acts by debtor Brent A. Hanson, which appear
to constitute bad faith and/or fraud upon his creditors and upon the
Bankruptcy Court of the Middle District of North Carolina[i].
Specifically, the debtor did not disclose valuable assets[ii] and
apparently took deliberate steps to assure that his malfeasance would
not be discovered. The assets in question are Internet domains and
websites that by the debtor's own admission are worth tens of
thousands of dollars[iii].
I am litigating against Mr. Hanson for defamation[iv]. It was during
investigation after filing my defamation lawsuit that I discovered Mr.
Hanson's apparent bankruptcy fraud. I have retained counsel to request
the bankruptcy court lift any applicable stay so I may proceed with
litigation in California.
Research has led me to conclude that debtor Brent Hanson paid for,
registered, provided content to, operates, and controls several
valuable Internet websites, including LasikFraud.com[v],
BrentHanson.com[vi], TLCSurgeons.com[vii], and several others. Mr.
Hanson has publicly acknowledged that he has received an offer of
$10,000 for just one of these websites[viii].
Analysis of the facts lead me to conclude that Mr. Hanson owned these
websites at the time he filed for bankruptcy protection, that Mr.
Hanson knew these websites had significant value when he failed to
list these assets in his bankruptcy application, and that with intent
of malice, fraud, and in bad faith Mr. Hanson concealed his ownership
of these domains. I have learned that Mr. Hanson has a history of
attempting to hide ownership of websites from courts, including
employing the use of offshore resources[ix].
In his filing Mr. Hanson listed as a creditor "William Booth", with an
entire address of "TX"[x]. This could only have been William A.
Boothe, MD of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Boothe successfully sued Mr. Hanson
for defamation, reaching a settlement only to have Mr. Hanson file for
bankruptcy protection a few weeks later[xi].
There is no doubt that Mr. Hanson knows the correct spelling of Dr.
Boothe's name and the doctor's address. There is a standing court
order that demands he know this.
A Dallas court responded to threats of violence by Mr. Hanson against
Dr. Boothe with an order of restraint[xii] requiring Mr. Hanson to
stay at least 500 feet away from Dr. Boothe's business address, home
address, family, staff, and even Dr. Boothe's lawyer's address. This
temporary order was later made a permanent order of restraint against
Mr. Hanson as a part of the aforementioned settlement agreement.
It is my opinion that the misspelling of Dr. Boothe's name and lack of
complete address was a deliberate act by Mr. Hanson to illegally limit
Dr. Boothe's rights as a creditor. I also believe that this act of
subterfuge was calculated to assure that Mr. Hanson's website
ownership would not be revealed.
Mr. Hanson's defamation of Dr. Boothe included publication of
statements about Dr. Boothe on Mr. Hanson's websites[xiii]. If Dr.
Boothe had been appropriately notified of Mr. Hanson's filing for
bankruptcy protection, the absence of Mr. Hanson's valuable websites
and domains would have most certainly been noticed by Dr. Boothe and
reported to the court. It appears that Mr. Hanson not only attempted
to defraud the court and to deny Dr. Boothe his rights as a creditor,
but Mr. Hanson endeavored to deny Dr. Boothe his rights as a
successful plaintiff in the Dallas case.
In light of these facts, it seems appropriate for your office to
verify the information I have presented and act on your findings. If
my accusations of fraud and bad faith are valid, then I believe it
would be in the best interests of Mr. Hanson's debtor's, in the spirit
of fairness, and by the letter of the law, that the court secure all
of Mr. Hanson's assets, convert the Chapter 13 bankruptcy to Chapter
7, and liquidate Mr. Hanson's non-exempt assets to provide creditor
relief.
It appears that the true value of Mr. Hanson's assets is equal to or
greater than Mr. Hanson's total liabilities. Mr. Hanson's creditors
would conceivably receive 100% of the amounts owed immediately, rather
than the 27% over three years offered by Mr. Hanson.
If Mr. Hanson's Internet websites and domains do become available for
purchase through the bankruptcy court, please notify me. I am in
contact with several parties who would be interested in purchasing
them.
Thank you in advance for your consideration and attention to this
matter. Please kindly respond to affirm receipt of this information.
/s/ Glenn Hagele
[i] Voluntary petition for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection filed 23
August 2005 by Brent A. Hanson, case 05-82419, US Bankruptcy Court,
Middle District, North Carolina
[ii] Bankruptcy case 05-82419 page 5, Schedule B, Personal Property,
[iii] Statement of debtor Brent Hanson on 2 April 2003 via Google
Newsgroup alt.lasik-eyes interface.
[iv] Hagele v. Hanson, case 06AS00839, Superior Court of the State of
California County of Sacramento, 16 March 2006.
[v] Statement of Registrar of Record.
[vi] Statement of Registrar of Record
[vii] Statement of Registrar of Record
[viii] Statement of debtor Brent Hanson on 2 April 2003 via Google
UseGroup interface regarding offer for LasikFraud.com.
[ix] Affidavit of forensic computer analyst in Boothe v. Hanson, case
219-86-05, District Court of Collin County, Texas, 219th Judicial
District
[x] Bankruptcy case 05-82419, Schedule F, Creditors Holding Unsecured
Nonpriority Claims
[xi] Final agreement, 27 June 2005, Boothe v. Hanson, case 219-86-05,
District Court of Collin County, Texas, 219th Judicial District
[xii] 20 January, 2005 ex parte temporary order of restraint Boothe v.
Morikawa & Hanson, case 219-86-05, District Court of Collin County,
Texas, 219th Judicial District.
[xiii] Affidavit of forensic computer analyst in re: Boothe v. Hanson,
case 219-86-05, District Court of Collin County, Texas, 219th Judicial
District
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
|