|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > April 2006 > Re: DARWIN SAID A MOUTHFUL -- OR: eye, Eye, EYE
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: DARWIN SAID A MOUTHFUL -- OR: eye, Eye, EYE
|
|
| Neil Brooks 2006-04-13, 11:27 am |
|
"Ed Conrad" <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:q31r32dnhs4049k6m2d9cfikqo8rubdm4e@4ax.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> <
> (On Sat, 11 May 1996, Ed Conrad wrote to talk.origins, etc., in
> response to Michael Clark's accusation that he had used only
> a portion of Charles Darwin's quote in which he expressed
> serious doubts about the evolution of the eye:
> <
> =======================================================
> <
> The Ed Conrad Hurry-Up-I-Have-to-Catch-a-Train Version:
> <
.. .[vbcol=seagreen]
> <
> =======================================================
> <
> The Charles Darwin Let-Me-Put-You-To-Sleep Version:
> <
Origin of Species[vbcol=seagreen]
> <
> ==========================================================
> <
> I thought I said what Darwin had said but Dave Iain Greig at
> Ediacara U., a colleague of mine at Ediacara University,
> said what I said wasn't what Darwin said because he said Darwin said
> something more than what I said he said, then Steve Vickers of UK
> sends an E-Mail and said he knows what Darwin said, which is not
> entirely what I said he said, so I said to myself, ` I'll say what
> he said Darwin said even though I don't know if he really said it,
> since this is what he said he had said.
> <
> Actually, Michael, it doesn't really matter what Darwin said or what
> these fellas said he said -- or what they said I didn't say -- since
> what I said, whether Darwin said it or not, isn't something that was
> vital to say, and I'm sort of saying he had painted himself into a
> corner and said what he thought he'd better say, else critics would
> say he really had nothing to say, even though he had said it.
> <
> ==============================================
> <
> Wonder what Darwin Would'ver Said About This:
> <
> <
>
> It means the bones have to be older than the material in which
> they are encased..
> Same as many thousands of other petrified bones, teeth
> and soft organs I've discovered between anthracite veins,
> they offer the undeniable physical evidence that large land
> animals -- man included -- had existed on earth while
> coal was being formed some280 million years ago..
> <
> <
> <
> < http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/TestResults.jpg
> <
> <
> ==========================================
> Ed Conrad
Please feel free not to cross-post this junk.
|
| |
|
|