| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2006-02-27, 11:02 am |
| On 26 Feb 2006 21:07:01 -0800, "Sandy" <sandy@savvysneaks.com> wrote:
>No, I didn't say that it was written by an officer of the court,
>Hagele. You are lying.
Here is the statement published by "Courtroom_News" who appears to be
the same person who posts as "Wendy" and a few others.
>Dr. Robert Maloney Suffers Breakdown in Court
>"Dr. Robert Maloney must be cracking under all of the pressure of not only
>the lawsuits filed against him, but also that he is finding it necessary to
>testify on behalf of optometrists who send him countle$$ patient$.
>He actually started bawling in the courtroom recently while basically
>testifying that the State of California's charges against optometrist James
>Hawley are outrageous. Testimony was halted while facial tissues were
>retrieved for the overwrought doctor. His crying triggered a similar
>reaction in Hawley, who also required tissues. The charges Maloney is so
>upset about are those brought by the California State Attorney General. If
>the optometrist loses his license or cannot refer patient$ for la$ik
>subsequent to disciplinary action by the Board, Dr. Maloney will suffer a
>loss of income. Both of them refused to admit to how many patient$ are
>being referred back and forth, but the financial benefit$ of their
>relation$hip are obviou$. Now may not be a good time to have LASIK with Dr.
>Maloney, as the stress of this situation is probably making his hands quite
>shaky and he could possibly start crying again at any given moment."
The entire responsive thread is located at
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q236646BC, with the portions relevant to
Keller's most recent lie(s) are:
My statement to "Wendy" on 22 February 7:37pm:
>Well, "Wendy", you have already provided Dr. Maloney's testimony from
>Dr. Hawley's hearing. Actually, what you provided was your warped
>analysis of what Dr. Maloney said and did.
Keller's response to my statement on 23 February 12:22am:
>Are you sure it was "warped", Glenn? I didn't see you there.
My response to Keller on 23 February at 22 minutes after midnight:
>One can start by considering the warped source.
Keller's statement 23 February 2006 3:08pm
>Oooh, I don't think the officer of the court who provided the narrative
>is going to appreciate that!"
And here is Keller's response today:
>No, I didn't say that it was written by an officer of the court,
>Hagele. You are lying.
So now Keller is attempting to get out of one lie by lying that she
didn't say it in the first place. Keller, you are a friggin' liar
about being a friggin' liar.
Keller can't come up with the name of an "officer of the court" who
made these statements about Dr. Maloney, so she lies that she said an
"officer of the court" made these statements about Dr. Maloney.
Lie after lie after lie after lie after lie.....
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
|