Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > February 2006 > Glenn Hagele claims to be a "patient advocate", yet patients despise him





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Glenn Hagele claims to be a "patient advocate", yet patients despise him
Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

Hagele can't point to a single lasik web site operator that endorses
him, and who has had a bad outcome from refractive surgery.

Pretty simple explanation: he is lying when he claims to be a "patient
advocate".

Glenn - USAEyes.org

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

On 23 Feb 2006 11:12:55 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<administrator@lasikcourt.com> wrote:

>Hagele can't point to a single lasik web site operator that endorses
>him, and who has had a bad outcome from refractive surgery.


I didn't know we need a website operator's endorsement to advocate for
patients. Where is that rule?

>Pretty simple explanation: he is lying when he claims to be a "patient
>advocate".


No, I'm not lying, and the thousands of people we have helped over the
years are an affirmation to the advocacy we provide.

We do have positive proof that a court in Texas has determined Brent
Hanson of LasikFraud.com is a liar, defamer, and contemptuous of the
court. See
http://glennhagele.com/brenthanson/..._Jail_Order.pdf
for the documented proof.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.
Ragnar

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

I'm curious.. just what is it you would like Glenn to do? What did he
ever do to you? What would you like him to stop doing?
He's about as sympathetic to you malcontents as possible without
making a complete fool of himself. I think he goes way too far trying
to appease you malcontent nuts.



On 23 Feb 2006 11:12:55 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<administrator@lasikcourt.com> wrote:

>Hagele can't point to a single lasik web site operator that endorses
>him, and who has had a bad outcome from refractive surgery.
>
>Pretty simple explanation: he is lying when he claims to be a "patient
>advocate".

Glenn - USAEyes.org

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

An interesting point, Ragnar, but Brent Hanson of LasikFraud.com does
not need an actual reason to attack someone.

William Boothe, MD had done absolutely nothing against Hanson. Boothe
never provided Hanson medical care. Boothe had never said anything
about Hanson or LasikFraud.com. Dr. Boothe had absolutely nothing to
do with Brent Hanson when Hanson attacked Boothe, making false
statements about him, creating multiple websites to defame Dr. Boothe,
and ultimately requiring Boothe to litigate against Hanson, getting an
order of restraint and then the court ended up sentencing Hanson to
jail when he defied that order.

Hanson does not need a reason to attack someone. Not a legitimate
reason, anyway.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.
Linda

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm


Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
> An interesting point, Ragnar, but Brent Hanson of LasikFraud.com does
> not need an actual reason to attack someone.
>
> William Boothe, MD had done absolutely nothing against Hanson. Boothe
> never provided Hanson medical care. Boothe had never said anything
> about Hanson or LasikFraud.com. Dr. Boothe had absolutely nothing to
> do with Brent Hanson when Hanson attacked Boothe, making false
> statements about him, creating multiple websites to defame Dr. Boothe,
> and ultimately requiring Boothe to litigate against Hanson, getting an
> order of restraint and then the court ended up sentencing Hanson to
> jail when he defied that order.
>
> Hanson does not need a reason to attack someone. Not a legitimate
> reason, anyway.


I have a feeling that this is not going to end well for Brent. Anyone
who behaves as though they are above the law eventually gets what is
coming to them. The astounding thing about the whole Brent saga is that
he seems to truly believe that if you repeat falsehoods over and over
again eventually they become the truth! At first I found Brent just
annoying, but now I find him a bit scary. If you fling enough mud, it
eventually sticks, even if the person flinging the mud is unhinged. I
guess that is why Dr Boothe took the action he did. I would be scared
for my own welfare and the welfare of my family.
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.


ycdbsoya

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

Glenn is a patient advocate and I am a direct beneficiary of his
advocacy. Glenn helped me reach an out-of-court cash settlement with my
LASIK butcher...errr, doctor. He went to bat for me numerous times
against a very influential and well-connected surgeon and his
liars...err, lawyers, and who later lost his license. Glenn also ripped
the doc's CQRSA cert.

While I don't always agree with Glenn's approaches, and yes, we have
gotten into it from time to time, rest assured that he is an effective
patient advocate.

And you are not. Brent, you are not even worth the minerals in your
body, which are estimated at $0.96. You really need get rid of your
inane obsessions and go stand on a third rail somewhere.

Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

"Genn is a patient advocate and I am a direct beneficiary of his
advocacy. Glenn helped me reach an out-of-court cash settlement with my
LASIK butcher...errr, doctor. He went to bat for me numerous times
against a very influential and well-connected surgeon and his"

Prove it.

Glenn - USAEyes.org

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

On 23 Feb 2006 14:05:11 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<administrator@lasikcourt.com> wrote:

>"Genn is a patient advocate and I am a direct beneficiary of his
>advocacy. Glenn helped me reach an out-of-court cash settlement with my
>LASIK butcher...errr, doctor. He went to bat for me numerous times
>against a very influential and well-connected surgeon and his"
>
>Prove it.


You see Frank, one cannot use reason with someone who is unreasonable.

And thanks for the kind words.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.
ycdbsoya

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

I wouldn't cross the road to spit on your dead body, Brent. Even if I
wasn't legally constrained from discussing the terms of the settlement,
I need to prove nothing to a nobody like you.

You do nothing for this NG except clog up bandwidth.

Ragnar

2006-02-25, 9:54 pm

It's interesting how the mega malcontents turn the average malcontents
into normal people. L.C. and Frank and Minarik are all acting normal
now. At least the worst malcontent of all who is always wRONg is not
posting here. Even the mega malcontents can't stand him. Even Ms
LasikFlap dumped his XXX.


On 24 Feb 2006 08:09:16 -0800, "ycdbsoya" <the_boydstons@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>I wouldn't cross the road to spit on your dead body, Brent. Even if I
>wasn't legally constrained from discussing the terms of the settlement,
>I need to prove nothing to a nobody like you.
>
>You do nothing for this NG except clog up bandwidth.

Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com