|
| >his is not surprising that Keller is adverising the low prices of
LVI.
I'm not advertising anything to do with lasik.
> She also posted the glowing resume of the LVI surgeon who holds
>the world's record for eye infections.
Posted it--that's correct. With no commentary, no endorsement,
nothing. Just posted what he wrote about himself.
>That man had more eye
>infections in one day than half a dozen surgeons would have in an
>entire career.
All I know of him is what I've read of what you posted here. I don't
read all of your dribble, so I'm sure I've missed a lot.
>Yet she is a fan of his.
Not a fan. Not true.
>Why? I have pointed this
>out before. She WANTS people to have complications.
Not true. If that were true, I'd be encouraging more people to have
surgery, so there would be more lasik casualties. The world doesn't
need more!
>She then wants to
>extort money out of the surgeons when a problem happens.
I have never extorted money out of anyone.
> I would not
>be surprised if she is the one that advised Kathy Griffin to forego
>having her very minor ingrowth corrected when first diagnosed.
I haven't offered Kathy Griffin any advice whatsoever.
>She
>wanted it to get worse so she could collect big $$$.
Not true. I didn't know about it until Kathy was scheduled to have
surgery with Dr. Assil to fix the complications she was suffering after
her surgery with Dr. Robert Maloney.
>Let us just assume that Keller didn't INTEND to do the above. That
>doesn't really matter since her actions result in that. She will
>never admit to recommending the bad LVI surgeon -
Correct, I did not recommend any LVI surgeon.
>however, she did
>post his glowing resume without any comment of her own.
Finally! You got it right.
> Obviously
>the resume on it's own is a glowing endorsment of that doctor.
That's his responsibility--not mine.
>Just
>about every surgeon's resume reads as if they are the greatest thing
>since the wheel.
Can't disagree with that one.
> If she were at all responsible - which she isn't -
>she would have posted that resume with the comment that this surgeon
>is one to AVOID.
I don't have any experience with that surgeon, so I can neither
recommend nor discommend him.
> She didn't do that and hasn't done that to this day.
And I won't.
>iRONically, the clown Keller works for
I don't work for anyone else and haven't since 1987.
> and who set up and owns both of
her (now anonymous) websites
That is incorrect information.
|
|