| Ragnar 2006-02-25, 9:53 pm |
| This is not surprising that Keller is adverising the low prices of
LVI. She also posted the glowing resume of the LVI surgeon who holds
the world's record for eye infections. That man had more eye
infections in one day than half a dozen surgeons would have in an
entire career. Yet she is a fan of his. Why? I have pointed this
out before. She WANTS people to have complications. She then wants to
extort money out of the surgeons when a problem happens. I would not
be surprised if she is the one that advised Kathy Griffin to forego
having her very minor ingrowth corrected when first diagnosed. She
wanted it to get worse so she could collect big $$$. That didn't
happen and Ms. Griffin risked permanent vision loss.
Let us just assume that Keller didn't INTEND to do the above. That
doesn't really matter since her actions result in that. She will
never admit to recommending the bad LVI surgeon - however, she did
post his glowing resume without any comment of her own. Obviously
the resume on it's own is a glowing endorsment of that doctor. Just
about every surgeon's resume reads as if they are the greatest thing
since the wheel. If she were at all responsible - which she isn't -
she would have posted that resume with the comment that this surgeon
is one to AVOID. She didn't do that and hasn't done that to this day.
iRONically, the clown Keller works for and who set up and owns both of
her (now anonymous) websites actually went on the local tv news and
defended LVI and that doctor claiming that over two dozen infections
in one day is normal!!! On the SAME news program segment, the most
prominent LASIK surgeon in Florida stated that in over 30,000
procedures, he has yet to have even ONE infection. Someone would
have to be a total idiot not to realize that someone was paid off.
Unfortunately for bozo, that little payoff from LVI and the televised
news report which is viewable on the internet cost him his last shred
of credibility and lost every sponsor he ever conned into paying him
for his "services". Good job bozo.
I used to work in a field in which jobs were awarded based upon bids.
Almost always, the price bid on the job would be a loss if it went
through with no problems. The owner of the company would gamble that
the job would be problems in the job that required revisions that were
not included in the bid price. The point is.. the profits were made
on the revisions/problems. This is the same kind of garbage that
makes some highly unscrupulous people steer people into taking bad
advice and then scaring them into having ill-advised and often
unnecessary treatment from the "rehabiliation docs".
BTW.. I told both my optometrist and ophthalmologist about the
"rehabilitation docs" and they both laughed spontaneously - realizing
that the "rehab docs" are nothing but vultures or ambulance chasers.
It is understandable why such people would be put in jail in England
or executed in China. They are a menace to society. No better than a
terrorist - only they use misinformation and propaganda insted of
bullets. Mr. Goebels in WW2 was the first to discover and utilize
propaganda via mass communication (radio, newspapers, speeches, movie
reels). Some of these malcontents are just as unscrupulous.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:12:30 GMT, Glenn - USAEyes.org
<glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote:
>Lasik Surgeons Advertise On LasikDisaster.com. Integrity For Sale
>
>What can you see at LasikDisaster.com? Stories of patients with poor
>outcomes? Keller's sad, sad tale? Advertisements of Lasik surgeons?
>
>Yea, that's right,, Sandy Keller and Paula Cofer can deride the
>refractive surgery industry, but when they can put some money in their
>pockets they don't have a problem with advertising that same industry.
>
>Can you say, "hypocrite"?
>
>Who advertises on LasikDisaster.com? Well, how about Lasik Vision
>Institute who promotes both 500,000 successful surgeries AND $299 per
>eye. Keller, how nice of you to let people who visit LasikDisaster.com
>know about those cheap Lasik deals.
>
>Could this be why Keller published Dr. Rothman's curriculum vitae in
>response to Ragnar's complaints about him? Wouldn't want to interfere
>with your income now would you Keller?
>
>You will also see Dr. Kawesch advertised there too! Naw, not that one,
>but his brother. Just click the ad on LasikDisaster.com and you are at
>the website of "Northern California's expert" in refractive surgery.
>Aww Cofer, it is swell of you to let LasikDisaster.com visitors know
>who is Northern California's expert.
>
>Not to be outdone by Lasik Vision Institute, Keller/Cofer are making
>money off of Lasik Plus too. Learn all about their "state of the art
>technology & facilities". I guess Keller and Cofer were just kidding
>all those times they derided "Lasik Mills".
>
>And look at THIS: Keller/Cofer even accept advertising from a CRSQA
>Certified Refractive Surgeon on LasikDisaster.com. Maybe our
>organization should buy an ad on LasikDisaster.com, since it is
>obviously for sale. I had better first look at that all important
>Return On Investment (ROI) that has Keller so concerned in regard to
>CRSQA certification.
>
>So tell us Keller; come clean Cofer; how much are you making on
>selling ad space for Lasik? Hundreds? Thousands? Tens of thousands?
>How much does this income influence who you vilify and who you ignore?
>Gosh Keller, what are you going to do if Dr. Maloney buys an ad on
>LasikDisaster.com? Perhaps Dr. Hawley should sign up too. Good grief,
>Keller/Cofer, what are you going to do if CRSQA buys an ad on
>LasikDisaster.com?
>
>It looks like that sanctimonious "I don't make anything off of Lasik"
>line is the window.
>
>Bottom line: Keller/Cofer will sell their integrity for the few
>shekels an ad on LasikDisaster.com will bring in. Excuse my bluntness,
>but the term that comes to my mind rhymes with "boars".
>
>Shame on you Keller. Shame, shame, shame.
>
>Glenn Hagele
>Executive Director
>USAEyes.org
>
>"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
>Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
>http://www.USAEyes.org
>http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
>I am not a doctor.
|