|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > October 2006 > Frag is 20/20 so he does NOT need more lasik!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Frag is 20/20 so he does NOT need more lasik!
|
|
|
| LOL Frag you are 20/20 or better and you want MORE lasik? Sorry but no
competent surgeon is going to do that, especially not 5 years later. It
would be malpractice for a lasik surgeon to do lasik to someone thats
20/20. Ragnar said its highly unlikley you were ever 20/10, that
approaches the limit of the retina. How well did you see with glasses?
Probably not 20/10 and lasik isnt gonna give you what glasses couldnt.
What is your perscription now? Probably something like -.25
astigmatism. Lasik cant even touch less than -1 astigmatism. If you
were so picky about your vision, you should have never gotten lasik in
the first place.
| |
| serebel 2006-10-14, 9:34 pm |
|
Ace wrote:
> LOL Frag you are 20/20 or better and you want MORE lasik? Sorry but no
> competent surgeon is going to do that, especially not 5 years later. It
> would be malpractice for a lasik surgeon to do lasik to someone thats
> 20/20. Ragnar said its highly unlikley you were ever 20/10, that
> approaches the limit of the retina. How well did you see with glasses?
> Probably not 20/10 and lasik isnt gonna give you what glasses couldnt.
> What is your perscription now? Probably something like -.25
> astigmatism. Lasik cant even touch less than -1 astigmatism. If you
> were so picky about your vision, you should have never gotten lasik in
> the first place.
Once again the retard knows better than anyone else.
| |
|
|
serebel wrote:
> Ace wrote:
>
>
>
> Once again the retard knows better than anyone else.
Even Ragnar himself pointed out that 20/20 is perfect and more lasik
wouldnt help. He did suggest z-wave RGPs but then he shouldnt have
gotten lasik in the first place and just gotten contacts till he
couldnt tolerate them then get whatever technology is out.
| |
|
| I do apologise for the people in this group who actually try to help
queries like mine, but I just have to answer this one...
Ace banged the rocks together and they said :
> LOL Frag you are 20/20 or better and you want MORE lasik? Sorry but no
> competent surgeon is going to do that, especially not 5 years later.
> It would be malpractice
Sorry to have to tell you but there IS a world outside the USA.
This news will come as a shock, I'm sure, but there you go.
> Ragnar said its highly unlikley you were ever 20/10
Highly unlikely does not mean totally impossible.
Consider this, if one starts off long sighted, is (deliberately)
overcorrected to slightly short sighted and then the healing process
regresses the sight back to slightly long sighted its *GOT* to pass
through the "perfect" sight point hasn't it? You can't get from -10mph
to 5mph without passing 0mph.
> If you
> were so picky about your vision, you should have never gotten lasik in
> the first place.
That makes sense, the procedure I had which corrected a vast amount of
my long sight, and astigmatism, and didn't leave me with any problems,
you say I should never have had.
So I suppose when I broke my leg years ago they shouldn't have fixed it
up too?
--
frag
<stuff goes here>
|
| |
|
|