| Ragnar 2006-10-13, 2:29 am |
| I agree with you CG!
Ace has been trying to push orthoK as a replacement for lasik. It is
not. I would suggest that before doing orthoK, people should first
try wearing standard RGP lenses.
OrthoK is only intented for a very small number of people with mild
myopia. Ace is not even in that category - so he is wasting his time.
Ace is in fact, just about the worst nightmare of any orthok doctor.
He is exposing the limitations of orthok even thought that is not his
intent.
On 12 Oct 2006 16:59:12 -0700, "cg_aust" <cg_aust@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Ace & Ragnar,
>
>Why does it need to be one or the other - ie lasik or orthok. Surely
>both are completely valid treatments, and suit different patients in
>different circumstances. It's not a competition, just a discussion
>about equally valid alternatives.
>
>
>Ace wrote:
|