|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > January 2006 > Foremost Reason To Avoid CRSQA Surgeons
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Foremost Reason To Avoid CRSQA Surgeons
|
|
| Sandy 2006-01-02, 11:04 am |
| Glenn Hagele, maybe Dr. Maloney is protected when he allows you to
access otherwise private patient information because you are a
"business associate", and HIPAA laws do not govern you/CRSQA.
Obviously, you feel as though you can investigate any patient operated
on by a CRSQA surgeon and blab it wherever you please, but
ethically/morally you are not in the right in posting information from
a patient chart on the internet.
If for this reason alone, I would NEVER go to a CRSQA surgeon again.
| |
| Ragnar 2006-01-02, 6:07 pm |
| Are you growing your own weed these days?
Nobody with any common sense would think that Dr. Maloney is giving
out confidential information. Just what is this confidential
information anyway? Griffin has gone on nationwide T.V. and posted
volumes of garbage online about every detail of her debacle. I don't
think there is anything she didn't divulge publically that is in those
top secret patient files. If Dr. Maloney let it slip that Griffin has
herpes, that would be a different story. Then he would be in trouble.
Neither Maloney nor Glenn mentioned that though.
On 2 Jan 2006 07:30:06 -0800, "Sandy" <sandy@savvysneaks.com> wrote:
>Glenn Hagele, maybe Dr. Maloney is protected when he allows you to
>access otherwise private patient information because you are a
>"business associate", and HIPAA laws do not govern you/CRSQA.
>Obviously, you feel as though you can investigate any patient operated
>on by a CRSQA surgeon and blab it wherever you please, but
>ethically/morally you are not in the right in posting information from
>a patient chart on the internet.
>
>If for this reason alone, I would NEVER go to a CRSQA surgeon again.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2006-01-02, 6:07 pm |
| HIPAA laws most certainly do apply to certification agencies. CRSQA is
HIPAA compliant and nothing I have revealed her is in violation of
HIPAA regulations on patient information.
Keller's latest tack in the Griffin story is absolutely hilarious, and
sooooooo typical. Keller goes on and on about Griffin, thinking that
her doctor is unable to respond. Then when the actual facts are
revealed and Keller has egg on her face, she makes accusations that
the truth should not have been revealed.
It appears to me that Keller is not the least bit interested in the
truth about Kathy Griffin's ordeal with epithelial ingrowth. She is
only interested in how she can twist things to attack her perceived
"enemies" Dr. Maloney and me.
The truth about Kathy Griffin's experience can be very helpful for
others because it shows the importance of following the doctor's
advice and getting timely treatment in the case of diagnosed
epithelial ingrowth.
>If for this reason alone, I would NEVER go to a CRSQA surgeon again.
For the sake of the patient and the surgeon I hope that potential
patients who think and act like Keller WOULD avoid CRSQA Certified
Refractive Surgeons.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
|
| What a big head you have, Glenn. I don't care enough about you and
your $ertification agency enough that you are my enemy. I just don't
want you to own this newsgroup, that's all.
Dr. Maloney is not my enemy. He tried to help me and I do appreciate
that. I strongly disagree with him on the topic of Dr. Hawley, and
will discuss that further once Hawley is dealt with by the State
Attorney General and Board of Optometry. That matter should conclude
in a few weeks.
What you are saying as Dr. Maloney's mouthpiece with regard to Kathy
Griffin's Maloney experience doesn't agree with what she has said. I
wish she'd post here, but so far she has not. I still say that it is
completely unethical of you to discuss her medical history with Dr.
Maloney and then come here and post it on the internet, whether or not
your organization is covered by HIPAA regulations, on which I am not
claiming to be an expert. It would seem to me that if you/CRSQA are
indeed covered by HIPAA regulations, that you are in some pretty hot
water if a complaint is filed. But then, as Brent stated, you could
be lying about the whole thing.
Hey, Glenn, have you reviewed MY records from Dr. Maloney's office?
Did you see the letter Dr. Maloney wrote to me when I told him what
happened with Dr. Hawley? You know, the one in which he said "This is
a very concerning story, Sandy." and then went on to say how Dr. Hawley
had an obligation to send me to the best laser center, regardless of
how he benefitted financially from referrals. I have a copy of it if
he has lost his, or maybe the Attorney General's office would fax it to
you. Also, you might have seen the letter I wrote to Dr. Maloney when
I discovered that Hawley was referring exclusively to him, after the
closure of the Torrance Pacific Laser Eye Center. I didn't know if he
remembered who my former optometrist was, and I was concerned that bad
candidates might be referred to his office without being properly
screened and/or informed. He obviously took issue with that letter and
that's when he wrote that Hawley was right in his failure to measure my
pupils. I know that Dr. Hawley refers a lot of patients to Maloney
and that the co-management arrangement between them is profitable for
both, which is why Dr. Maloney has taken the stand to defend Hawley in
the State's case against him. $$ beat rock, paper and scissors, don't
they?
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2006-01-03, 1:11 am |
| Well Keller, you apparently care enough to come to this forum and
write paragraph after paragraph about what you don't care enough about
to write paragraph after paragraph about.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Ragnar 2006-01-03, 11:02 am |
| On 2 Jan 2006 07:30:06 -0800, "Sandy" <sandy@savvysneaks.com> wrote:
>Glenn Hagele, maybe Dr. Maloney is protected when he allows you to
>access otherwise private patient information because you are a
>"business associate", and HIPAA laws do not govern you/CRSQA.
>Obviously, you feel as though you can investigate any patient operated
>on by a CRSQA surgeon and blab it wherever you please, but
>ethically/morally you are not in the right in posting information from
>a patient chart on the internet.
>
>If for this reason alone, I would NEVER go to a CRSQA surgeon again.
What a relief for all CRSQA surgeons!!!
I find it interesting that after years of battling with Glenn... Sandy
chose to go to a CRSQA surgeon!
I have a surgeon for you to go to next time Sandy. Go see Dr.
Rothman. As you recall, you posted a glowing characterization of him
in this newsgroup.
| |
| serebel 2006-01-04, 1:09 am |
| I've hacked into Maloney's records. Keller's record reads "lunatic" all
over it.
| |
| Marshall Cosme 2006-01-09, 1:02 am |
| http://www.321recipes.com/aspartame.html
This is a must read on eye health and maintainance. You may or may not be
affected , but you might be shocked!
Please excuse the interruption , but I thought you may be interested to know
what may be causing all kinds of health problems for yourself or for your
loved ones. I can't seem to get it through to my wife's brain about this
vital health issue, Now she is always saying she is having trouble with her
vision. Gee, I wonder why? I am so pissed off right now, I really want to
slap some sense into her. She has been feeding this poison to my four
children for years after I asked her not too, so you can see why I said what
I said previously, but I would never hit my wife. Why are people ignore what
science brings to are attention about health issues. I am really upset, but
I hope this helps you....since I can't get through to my wife of 16
years.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Sandy" <sandy@savvysneaks.com> wrote in message
news:1136215806.679426.270650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Glenn Hagele, maybe Dr. Maloney is protected when he allows you to
> access otherwise private patient information because you are a
> "business associate", and HIPAA laws do not govern you/CRSQA.
> Obviously, you feel as though you can investigate any patient operated
> on by a CRSQA surgeon and blab it wherever you please, but
> ethically/morally you are not in the right in posting information from
> a patient chart on the internet.
>
> If for this reason alone, I would NEVER go to a CRSQA surgeon again.
>
|
| |
|
|