| Author |
Internet Forum "Loon" Evaluation
|
|
|
|
| ycdbsoya 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| We know what you're getting at. Hey, let's all be mature, professional
adults representing the industry and make fun of the handicapped and
disabled!
Nice work, Glenn, or is that Little Glennie? And you criticize other
pros for "sinking to new lows?" What an f'n hypocrite.
As I said and as you demonstrate, you are part of the
Serebel/Ragnar/Glennie troika. Your denial of this is humorous. Keep it
up and you'll have an even bigger negative number for your credibility.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Jeeze Frank, I didn't make this thing up. It is somebody else's
website. I just thought it was hilarious how so many of the
indications of a "NetLoon" would easily apply to some of the regulars
and recent regulars here. Some that are common are:
3) Commonly forces their hypothesis into discussion threads that are
discussing other topics. (+ 40 points).
4) Claims to be an expert or a "specialist" on the subject but will
not give their credentials when asked. (+ 40 points).
6) Makes a statement that is widely known to be a misrepresentation of
a researcher's published conclusion. (+ 30 points).
7) Makes a statement that is widely agreed on to be false. (+10 points
per statement)*
8) When asked, they subsequently cannot (or will not) provide a
published reference that backs up their statement in #6 or #7. (+ 40
points).*
10) They create their own custom definitions for extant words or
concepts. (+ 40 points).
11) They create a new term to describe a common phenomenon that could
be (or is) described in a simpler way. (+40 points).
12) Makes a statement that is clearly vacuous (i.e., without content).
(+10 points per statement)*
13) Statement that is logically inconsistent. (+10 points per
statement)*
18) Repetitively "forgets" (or ignores) factual information, provided
by others in earlier discussion thread(s), that disproves (or is
strong evidence against) their hypothesis. (+ 30 points).*
22) Claims that the professional science community is trying to
silence him/her because the professional science community is trying
to cover up the "truth". (+40 points).*
23) Uses a thought experiment that contradicts the results of a widely
accepted real experiment. (+20 points)*
It is not "representing the industry" to provide substantiated facts.
Then again, perhaps substantiated facts is exactly what the industry
would want represented.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| ycdbsoya 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| But, we know what you're getting at. Don't plead innocence, it's very
transparent. You're stooping to the same level as the seragnebel duo.
In that sense, you're no different, my friend.
I really thought you were better than that, but I guess not. Maybe you
should change your sig from "I am not a doctor" to "I am not a
professional industry representative."
| |
| lindakendall3155@gmail.com 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
|
ycdbsoya wrote:
> But, we know what you're getting at. Don't plead innocence, it's very
> transparent. You're stooping to the same level as the seragnebel duo.
> In that sense, you're no different, my friend.
>
> I really thought you were better than that, but I guess not. Maybe you
> should change your sig from "I am not a doctor" to "I am not a
> professional industry representative."
I don't think Glenn was being as serious as you are making out. That
being said, even you must acknowledge that many of the regulars here
certainly fit into the category of "Internet Loon". I am talking about
both pro and anti Lasik posters.
Linda
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Yes, I think some of the regulars here are candidates for NetLoondum,
however I did not include anyone in the list of "NetLoon" suspects
neither did I leave anyone out. No matter what the agenda, if the Loon
shoe fits...
I personally find the term comical, and I find it enlightening that
the situation is so common across a wide range of subjects that an
actual term has been created.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| serebel 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Frank is another one with a great outcome, he sees all things. It takes
a paranoid nut like Frank to think Glenn's post is about him.
It's just plain funny Frankie, that's it, that's all, nothing to be
read into it. SHEESH!!!!
SErebel
| |
| serebel 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Frank is another one with a great outcome, he sees all things. It takes
a paranoid nut like Frank to think Glenn's post is about him.
It's just plain funny Frankie, that's it, that's all, nothing to be
read into it. SHEESH!!!!
SErebel
| |
| serebel 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Holy Moly!!! I just finished re-reading the site. It is all about
Frank. It describes him to a tee. It's definitely a "must read" before
reading the loon fringe on this site.
SErebel
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Well, SErebel, I know for a fact that Frank has a poor outcome. I was
involved in him getting a second opinion.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| serebel 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Er, Glenn, I know that too. I said the "great outcome" thing
metaphorically.
SErebel
| |
|
| This loon description sounds like Glenn Hagele. Except for the credentials
part. He freely admits he
has no credentials.
"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:odaeh1p0aled0uif6ju1m3v5059d8tc2mq@4ax.com...
> Jump over to this website:
>
> http://home.thegrid.net/~lllove/net-loon_index.html
>
> This hilarious page gives you all you need to evaluate your Internet
> forum's resident "loon". It is spot on.
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Couldn't do better than that "Harry"? Your creativity appears as
limited as your grasp on reality.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
|
| Didn't think you'd remember me. Yep.
Nothing got fixed but at least I finally understand why I can't see.
"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:9g7ih19cm898itmqjlqir01r8oeum71gld@4ax.com...
> Well, SErebel, I know for a fact that Frank has a poor outcome. I was
> involved in him getting a second opinion.
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.
| |
| ycdbsoya 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Geez, I never would have thought you lived in such a shithole and drove
such a lame car. No wonder you're so pissed of at everyone.
Also, note your post times and dates. Seems like you have only
"cyberfriends."
| |
| serebel 2005-09-24, 2:39 pm |
| Now Frank is seeing shitholes and lame cars. Yup, internet loon okay.
SErebel
|
|
|
|