|
| In article <1125283166.c50ae7385918851b9f0c964a62c7fc15@teranews>,
"LASIKtruth website contents" <LASIKtruth website @nospam.com> wrote:
> As a noun, as it is used
> in the study below from Emory university which found that all LASIK eyes had
> permanent pathology
> (disease) this use of the word and definition are correct
you all must have a secret version of this study with invisible writing
not available to the rest of us. No where in ALL the postings I've seen
does it mention anything to the effect that all LASIK eyes have
permanent pathology.
that's kind of like saying all eyes have permanent ophthalmology. Or all
cancerous tumors have permanent oncology.
Perhaps the reason the rest of us haven't read that nonsensical sentence
is because the study was done by scientists (pathologists) who know how
to use the word and draw conclusions from the scientific process.
They do conclude that all the eyes examined had pathologic changes but
that there is no evidence that it affects vision or structural integrity
in any way.
at least it's clear this is a pathological army of "one" who refuses to
understand the English language or the implications of this study.
Henry, Tabby, LasikTruth, Barb (who else recently?)--you would do well
for your credibility if you could give birth to a new alter ego who at
least vaguely understood the issues so that s/he would be taken
seriously.
Yes, I worry about the structural integrity of my eyes, but this study
that you continuously post and re-post doesn't prove a thing!
--
~RT
|
|