| Author |
Lasik Patient Advocacy Website Exceeds 3 Million
|
|
|
|
|
| In article <9qtac1dlnp0v11jhrjcsjn0k3ag83ts59n@4ax.com>,
Glenn - USAEyes.org <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote:
> A bit of blowing our own horn.
>
> http://www.dbusinessnews.com/showne...st&newsid=33685
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.
Congratulations. I found the 50 Tough Questions for your Doctor to be
invaluable in my search for the right doctor to do my LASIK procedure.
I also learned a lot from CRSQA's website about the issues, risks and
benefits involved.
--
~RT
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-07-03, 12:35 pm |
| Thank you for the kind words, RT. That is exactly why we are here.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Fernando 2005-07-03, 10:53 pm |
| NO, GLENN, you exist to make money promoting a bad procedure. Your website
is not a patient advocacy website, and you are no patient advocate.
"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:jtdbc1hfmitp4ptf368thi5835qub9hln6@4ax.com...
> Thank you for the kind words, RT. That is exactly why we are here.
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.
| |
| serebel 2005-07-03, 10:53 pm |
| Thank god no one listens to idiots like Fernando.
Good work Glenn.
SErebel
| |
| Ragnar 2005-07-04, 8:59 am |
| That is garbage Fernando. Glenn doesn't make all that much money, and
his own commentaries sure don't make any surgeon eager to give him
money. I have yet to see him recommend lasik to anybody, nor has he
had lasik done on himself. He's a stubborn character in love with his
glasses.
I challenge you to find any time Glenn has promoted LASIK.
And where do you get off calling lasik a bad procedure? It would seem
that the rest of the world disagrees with you. It is the most
peformed surgery of any surgery, the safest and most predicable
surgery with the fewest complications and arguably the greatest gains.
I would love to hear what surgery you think is a good procedure.
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:22:43 -0400, "Fernando"
<Fernando@aol_nospam.com> wrote:
>NO, GLENN, you exist to make money promoting a bad procedure. Your website
>is not a patient advocacy website, and you are no patient advocate.
>
>
>"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
>news:jtdbc1hfmitp4ptf368thi5835qub9hln6@4ax.com...
>
| |
| Denise 2005-07-04, 11:52 am |
| Thank God everyone knows what Glenn is, and that you and Ragnar are morons.
You stated the obvious, Fernando, but thanks.
"serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1120447459.455551.306650@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Thank god no one listens to idiots like Fernando.
>
> Good work Glenn.
>
>
> SErebel
>
| |
| Denise 2005-07-04, 11:52 am |
| Everybody used to smoke cigarettes and thought it was safe and just great.
Glenn makes his living off of the LASIK industry.
He sells 'certifications' to LASIK surgeons. It's disgusting.
Since there is a growing body of evidence that LASIK does permanent damage
to the eye, calling it a bad surgery is appropriate, performing it is
medical malpractice, promoting it is unconscionable.
"Ragnar" <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bnbic157oeda5j31820uthl2s4rvk0rsmr@4ax.com...
> That is garbage Fernando. Glenn doesn't make all that much money, and
> his own commentaries sure don't make any surgeon eager to give him
> money. I have yet to see him recommend lasik to anybody, nor has he
> had lasik done on himself. He's a stubborn character in love with his
> glasses.
> I challenge you to find any time Glenn has promoted LASIK.
> And where do you get off calling lasik a bad procedure? It would seem
> that the rest of the world disagrees with you. It is the most
> peformed surgery of any surgery, the safest and most predicable
> surgery with the fewest complications and arguably the greatest gains.
> I would love to hear what surgery you think is a good procedure.
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:22:43 -0400, "Fernando"
> <Fernando@aol_nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
| |
| serebel 2005-07-05, 12:08 pm |
| Comparing the cigarette industry to lasik is like comparing apples to
hand grenades.
What would one expect from loonies like Denise?
SErebel
| |
| Laser Hemorroid Surgeon 2005-07-05, 12:08 pm |
|
"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:9qtac1dlnp0v11jhrjcsjn0k3ag83ts59n@4ax.com...
>A bit of blowing our own horn.
>
> http://www.dbusinessnews.com/showne...st&newsid=33685
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor...
> I'm an XXXXXXX!
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
|
|
|
|