Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > June 2005 > Re: Leukoma and LME still don't get it........OR do they?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Leukoma and LME still don't get it........OR do they?
Ilana

2005-06-28, 11:08 pm

What? He has a JOB? I heard he was unemployed.


"CatmanX" <grantm@connexus.net.au> wrote in message
news:1119749090.398762.224620@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> WTF????
>
> You really are a moron, aren't you. Talk about consistency.
>
> Read the post stupid. I said that ther is no reason someone with -11.00
> and cyl can't have good vision, as SErebel suggested. I also said that
> there was no reason they would not be affected by haloes after Lasik.
> In fact, it is expected due to the smaller ablation zone necessary.
>
> Will RGP lenses fix haloes if they are present? Probably.
>
> My point here is SErebel is making assumptions that are unwarranted. Is
> Lou Coma grandstanding? Possibly, but I can vouch that he does know how
> to fit a C/L and does carry extensive trial sets for his rehab
> patients. There is a high probability that he can do something about
> the haloes of a patient with that complaint.
>
> For what it is worth, correcting cyls is not an automatic site
> (shouldn't that be SIDE) effect of Lasik, it is a component of the
> ablation programmed into the laser. Secondly, correcting Hyperopia DOES
> involve ablating the central cornea, or there would not be any change
> in prescription. The purpose of the peripheral doughnut is to leave a
> button in the centre that can be altered. Cyls can then be corrected by
> the central ablation.
>
> Can you please learn something about the subject before you post, it is
> really embarrassing having to give lessons in optics to a computer
> repairer over the internet.
>
> dr grant
>



Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com