|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > June 2005 > a message to Rags. Others should just delete.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
a message to Rags. Others should just delete.
|
|
|
| In article <ru06b11u5oljg3i91006m6t1hepitvorvi@4ax.com>,
Ragnar <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Below you say that I have e-mailed you privately a few times. That's
> not exactly true. I e-mailed you once 8 months ago. One message
> ever. And I was asking you why you were taking digs at me. As you
> recall, you used to include me in your sign-off tagline in every one
> of your messages. I wanted to know what your problem was. You seem
> to have some obsession with me.
Well, not exactly true. You have emailed me 3 times (1/26/04; 1/27/04
and 10/04/04) and the time you are referring to was not about me taking
digs at you, but about the fact that I should remove Flap Melt from my
tag line since that person stopped posting. In fact I responded by
asking you if you wanted me to remove you from my tag line and you
answered on (1/27/04):
R T wrote:
Are you asking me to take off my signature from my
postings?
ragnar suomi wrote:
No, I was just pointing out that the name Flap Melt is now irrelevant.
That tag line always was a bit silly. The nut brigade can't seem to
make an impact anymore due to lack of credibility.
the message you sent me about 8 months ago was a tirade against certain
ex-posters on this list and I refused to get involved although one of
those ex-posters did post your private message to him on this list.
That was a hoot, because you denied you wrote it, but you wrote me
almost exactly the same thing, so I know it was true.
and yes, I do still have all messages ever sent to me at this email
address. I only use this email address for this NG. And since Yahoo
upgraded their storage, I have no reason to delete anything.
--
~RT
| |
| Ragnar 2005-06-18, 6:25 pm |
| What I said previously is exactly correct, and what you mention below
is again not accurate. The 10/04 message was almost entirely about
one person.
The 01/04 messages I don't have anymore, but I remember them. I only
messaged you to keep yourself from further making a fool of yourself.
Believe me, I wouldn't waste my time ever e-mailing you again.
You are not a malcontent yourself, but you are a malcontent's dream.
Someone who is so wishy-washy that they will say anything - positive
or negative - without ever making a point - just to participate in a
conversation.
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:04:09 GMT, RT <RTMD24@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <ru06b11u5oljg3i91006m6t1hepitvorvi@4ax.com>,
> Ragnar <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>Well, not exactly true. You have emailed me 3 times (1/26/04; 1/27/04
>and 10/04/04) and the time you are referring to was not about me taking
>digs at you, but about the fact that I should remove Flap Melt from my
>tag line since that person stopped posting. In fact I responded by
>asking you if you wanted me to remove you from my tag line and you
>answered on (1/27/04):
>
>R T wrote:
>
> Are you asking me to take off my signature from my
> postings?
>
>ragnar suomi wrote:
>
>No, I was just pointing out that the name Flap Melt is now irrelevant.
>That tag line always was a bit silly. The nut brigade can't seem to
>make an impact anymore due to lack of credibility.
>
>
>the message you sent me about 8 months ago was a tirade against certain
>ex-posters on this list and I refused to get involved although one of
>those ex-posters did post your private message to him on this list.
>That was a hoot, because you denied you wrote it, but you wrote me
>almost exactly the same thing, so I know it was true.
>
>and yes, I do still have all messages ever sent to me at this email
>address. I only use this email address for this NG. And since Yahoo
>upgraded their storage, I have no reason to delete anything.
| |
|
| In article <tie7b15u491h6ab9efrsdlicn0s7t5riab@4ax.com>,
Ragnar <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I only
> messaged you to keep yourself from further making a fool of yourself.
Awww, so sweet. I've returned the favor--see below.
>
> Believe me, I wouldn't waste my time ever e-mailing you again.
Phew.
>
> You are not a malcontent yourself, but you are a malcontent's dream.
> Someone who is so wishy-washy that they will say anything - positive
> or negative - without ever making a point - just to participate in a
> conversation
Pegging someone else as "wishy washy" is done by people who aren't
willing to listen to the issues and who are, in fact, unable to
understand them because their judgment is so clouded by their egos that
they stop reasoning and become single minded. Ultimately, to reasonable
people, they are the ones that look like "fools."
(just a little message to keep you from further making a fool of
yourself)
--
~RT
|
| |
|
|