|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > June 2005 > Clifford talks to fairies in the garden
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Clifford talks to fairies in the garden
|
|
| CatmanX 2005-06-08, 6:10 pm |
| What the F#*%!!!!
Let's think about it cliff.
You said H-lasik caused hyperopia - it doesn't. It reduces hyperopia by
creating myopia or negative power.
You said myopia and nearsightedness and shortsightedness were different
things - they are the same. There is no difference, the words are
interchangable.
Yes, it is frightening - to think you can breath and type at the same
time. Once again, you are attacking me to cover up your own silliness.
dr grant
| |
| Ragnar 2005-06-08, 6:10 pm |
| I don't believe it. You not only misquoted me, you also got it
completely wrong AGAIN.
I never said nearsightedness and shortsightednewss were different, in
fact, I pointed out that they are the same.
You don't create hyperopia nor myopia.
Myopia is not the same as negative power. Negative power is a
characteristic of myopia.
For monovision, a myopic eye can be made farsighted with a positive
refractive error but the eye is still a myopic eye.
For monovision, a hyperopic eye can be made nearsighted with a
negative refractive error but the eye will remain hyperopic.
You know, this is the kind of thing that someone would learn on the
first day of studying eyecare. It's mind-boggling how thick skulled
and ignorant you are.
The scariest part about this is that I think you actually believe you
are right!!!
The malcontent crowd is fully justified in their claims that there are
quack eyecare providers out there. You are a perfect example of that.
On 8 Jun 2005 13:26:50 -0700, "CatmanX" <grantm@connexus.net.au>
wrote:
>What the F#*%!!!!
>
>Let's think about it cliff.
>
>You said H-lasik caused hyperopia - it doesn't. It reduces hyperopia by
>creating myopia or negative power.
>
>You said myopia and nearsightedness and shortsightedness were different
>things - they are the same. There is no difference, the words are
>interchangable.
>
>Yes, it is frightening - to think you can breath and type at the same
>time. Once again, you are attacking me to cover up your own silliness.
>
>dr grant
| |
| CatmanX 2005-06-09, 6:00 pm |
| Blah, blah, blah ..............
Once again Cliff, you say much without saying anything. You make stupid
comments that are wrong and then flame someone else for it.
What pi$$e$ you off is that I called your bluff.
dr grant
| |
| Ragnar 2005-06-09, 10:58 pm |
| If you want to see an example of stupic comments and "saying nothing"
I suggest you reat the 3 sentences below Mr. Mason: Four if you count
blah, blah, blah as being a fragmented sentence.
You are not fooling anyone.
On 9 Jun 2005 14:10:56 -0700, "CatmanX" <grantm@connexus.net.au>
wrote:
>Blah, blah, blah ..............
>
>Once again Cliff, you say much without saying anything. You make stupid
>comments that are wrong and then flame someone else for it.
>
>What pi$$e$ you off is that I called your bluff.
>
>dr grant
| |
| CatmanX 2005-06-10, 9:04 am |
| Ho hum, you really have nothing to say, do you Cliffy.
I am very sleepy now due to your continuing boredom.
dr grant
|
| |
|
|