|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > April 2005 > Regarding Ragnar and Glenn
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Regarding Ragnar and Glenn
|
|
| BarnardClassic 2005-04-19, 10:51 am |
| For those who don't know.... 'Ragnar' is actually Christopher Roiland - see
how Barnard really nails the character of both 'Ragnar' and Glenn Hagele in
just a few short words:
Responding to Chrissie "Rags" Roiland, DIP (not an acronym)
Rags, you're turning "psycho-paranoid delusions" into an art form. And
just like Glenn's ability to screw a LASIK candidate at the same time
he "services" a surgeon, it's quite a spectacle, but not prudent for us
humans to contemplate just after a meal.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-04-19, 10:51 am |
| Exactly what we have come to expect from you, Ron.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| serebel 2005-04-19, 10:51 am |
| It's either spring break or Ronny boy ran out of his goofy pills. I
have an idea for Link, start a website of loonie, whiner fanatics. Call
it Surgical Eyes.
SErebel
| |
| Ragnar 2005-04-19, 10:51 am |
| I can't believe that worm Link would dare post in this newsgroup
again. Who's he going to try and hit up for money this time? I don't
think anybody would stick up for him, including the malcontents.
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:48:05 GMT, Glenn - USAEyes.org
<glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote:
>Exactly what we have come to expect from you, Ron.
>
>Glenn Hagele
>Executive Director
>Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
>
>Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
>http://www.USAEyes.org
>http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
>I am not a doctor.
| |
| Michael Rosen 2005-04-22, 8:52 am |
|
"Ragnar" <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rgd661ttqtan23r6927v657n9vt9b1eer9@4ax.com...
>I can't believe that worm Link would dare post in this newsgroup
> again. Who's he going to try and hit up for money this time? I don't
> think anybody would stick up for him, including the malcontents.
>
>
Ragnar, it's ironic that you use the word, "malcontent". I've read quite a
few of your posts and I can't think of a more accurate word to describe you.
You have probably instilled needless fear in a number of people considering
LASIK. I'm all for someone warning people of the risks of LASIK surgery,
but your comments have absolutely no context or balance and serve no purpose
whatsoever except perhaps to make you feel important. You will take one
bad outcome out of thousands of procedures and act as though that one bad
outcome is proof of how unsafe a particular procedure is. You will also
libel companies and brands of equipment with no evidence whatsoever to back
up your claims. I don't know what your motive is, but I do know that your
opinions carry about as much weight as a grain of salt, which is how your
advice, if it could be called that, should be taken.
| |
| serebel 2005-04-22, 8:52 am |
| Ragnar would "take a bad outcome out of thousands and act as if it were
proof of how unsafe a procedure it is". Nope, you have never read his
posts.
SErebel
| |
| Michael Rosen 2005-04-22, 8:52 am |
|
"serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1114143941.607304.185870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Ragnar would "take a bad outcome out of thousands and act as if it were
> proof of how unsafe a procedure it is". Nope, you have never read his
> posts.
>
> SErebel
I've read quite a few, but I should have been more specific in my original
post. And after reading several key posts, the mystery of his bitterness
has been solved. He had a bad experience with the Lasik Vision Institute,
which has led to his doing everything he can to frighten people away from
them. Read his posts regarding LVI and you may agree, though if you are an
ally of his, this is unlikely.
| |
| Ragnar 2005-04-22, 8:52 am |
| What herbs have you been smoking?
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:16:41 GMT, "Michael Rosen"
<mikeyr@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>"Ragnar" <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:rgd661ttqtan23r6927v657n9vt9b1eer9@4ax.com...
>
>Ragnar, it's ironic that you use the word, "malcontent". I've read quite a
>few of your posts and I can't think of a more accurate word to describe you.
>You have probably instilled needless fear in a number of people considering
>LASIK. I'm all for someone warning people of the risks of LASIK surgery,
>but your comments have absolutely no context or balance and serve no purpose
>whatsoever except perhaps to make you feel important. You will take one
>bad outcome out of thousands of procedures and act as though that one bad
>outcome is proof of how unsafe a particular procedure is. You will also
>libel companies and brands of equipment with no evidence whatsoever to back
>up your claims. I don't know what your motive is, but I do know that your
>opinions carry about as much weight as a grain of salt, which is how your
>advice, if it could be called that, should be taken.
>
| |
| Ragnar 2005-04-22, 8:52 am |
| If you think it's okay for a company to refuse to refund your moeny
for a procedure they didn't do, even after a month later - then LVI is
for you.
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:53:43 GMT, "Michael Rosen"
<mikeyr@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>"serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:1114143941.607304.185870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>I've read quite a few, but I should have been more specific in my original
>post. And after reading several key posts, the mystery of his bitterness
>has been solved. He had a bad experience with the Lasik Vision Institute,
>which has led to his doing everything he can to frighten people away from
>them. Read his posts regarding LVI and you may agree, though if you are an
>ally of his, this is unlikely.
>
| |
| serebel 2005-04-22, 10:52 pm |
|
Michael Rosen wrote:
> "serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1114143941.607304.185870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
were[vbcol=seagreen]
his[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> I've read quite a few, but I should have been more specific in my
original
> post. And after reading several key posts, the mystery of his
bitterness
> has been solved. He had a bad experience with the Lasik Vision
Institute,
> which has led to his doing everything he can to frighten people away
from
> them. Read his posts regarding LVI and you may agree, though if you
are an
> ally of his, this is unlikely.
Ragnar rails against LVI but not lasik itself.
SErebel
| |
| Ragnar 2005-04-23, 8:54 am |
| On 22 Apr 2005 19:28:27 -0700, "serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote:
>
>Michael Rosen wrote:
>were
>his
>original
>bitterness
>Institute,
>from
>are an
>
> Ragnar rails against LVI but not lasik itself.
>
>SErebel
Ironically, I've found that malcontents defend LVI. They just love it
that LVI makes mistakes and cuts corners. Then they can say Lasik is
bad. Judgine LASIK based upon lasik done at LVI is like judging
american movies based upon the works of Pauly Shore.
|
| |
|
|