| LASIKtruth 2005-04-13, 4:44 pm |
| - Criticizing a bad doctor is a public service, even if he/she didn't happen
to trash your own corneas. Perhaps this is a sign of a social conscience, a
rarity on this board certainly.
- If someone is being vilified this must mean untrue statemtents have been
made - please provide an example of an untruth that you feel represents
vilification.
- A company offering a lifetime agreement should honor it.
- Complications can be predicted in many patients, but many bad candidates
are still being harmed by greedy doctors.
- As far as I'm concerned, a bad LASIK candidate is any individual with
eyes. Even Marguerite McDonald has given up LASIK in her surrical practice
because of flap complications and poor visual outcomes.
- Namecalling weakens the argument and credibility of the namecaller.
"CatmanX" <grantm@connexus.net.au> wrote in message
news:1113306304.313290.44480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Oh my god!!!
>
> I am being criticised by a dickhead.
>
> If you had any brains Brent, which, having read your site, it would
> appear you don't, i.e. criticising doctors who did not operate on you,
> expecting a lifetime service agreement applied to you, even when the
> company was never paid one cent by you, etc., you would understand that
> complications are able to be determined in many patients by careful
> pre-examination.
>
> You should spend less time vilifying people and spend some of your
> effort for good, not evil.
>
> grant
>
|