| Author |
Website of one of Dr. Donnenfeld's patients
|
|
|
|
| serebel 2005-03-19, 6:23 pm |
|
Sandy - LASIKdisaster.com - LASIKmemorial.com wrote:
> http://www.mylasikstory.com/
Here's Sandy with the latest breaking news from 1999 !!!
SErebel
| |
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:23 pm |
| What's interesting about that is the fact that one has to dig back 6
years to find something negative to post.
On 27 Feb 2005 19:38:25 -0800, "serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote:
>
>Sandy - LASIKdisaster.com - LASIKmemorial.com wrote:
>
>Here's Sandy with the latest breaking news from 1999 !!!
>
>SErebel
| |
| jhoge123@yahoo.com 2005-03-19, 6:23 pm |
| Ragnar wrote:
> What's interesting about that is the fact that one has to dig back 6
> years to find something negative to post.
Ragnar,
That is a very interesting and revealing comment, perhaps more so than
you meant at the time. It confirms most of what I believe is bad about
the Lasik industry.
Should a real doctor care when a wound was inflicted? A bone broken 6
years ago that hasn't healed properly would still warrant attention
from an orthopedic surgeon. Why does the Lasik Industry, which has
inflicted this wound to begin with, look back and say "but we are
better now"?
This is what is most revealing. The view that a patient is treated as a
mere prototype or testbed for experimentation. If that experiment
doesn't work, one simply moves on and tries to do better. The original
patient, now unprofitable, is simply discarded and ignored.
John Hoge
myLasikStory.com
| |
| serebel 2005-03-19, 6:23 pm |
| If feel you are discarded or ignored find a doc who will listen. What
Ragnar and I are saying is simply that Sandy dredges old news as if it
were up to date. That's all, nothing more to imply at all.
SErebel
|
|
|
|