|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > March 2005 > So says Dr. Minarik
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
So says Dr. Minarik
|
|
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| Although he hasn't identified himself below, its from Dr. Minarik. I
shall paraphrase Dr. Miarik's post below:
>Duh, that's a funny one, butthead. And you got something in before
>Beavis. ........better "protagonists" than you and
>buttwipe. Over the past year most of us have learned that engaging in
>a battle of wits with you blockheads quickly degrades into playing with
>one's own feces. Duh
- Dr. Kenneth Minarik
If anybody doubts that Minarik is insane, then you too might be
insane. His poo fetish reminds me of another insane optometrist.
Not only is he insane..he is stupid to attack Serebel. He's got
nothing to gain and a practice to lose over such a battle.
Minarik has done a world-class job of destroying whatever shred of
credibility he might have had left. It's disgraceful that such a
person is permitted to put the letters DR in front of their name.
Seems coincidental that the maturity of the LASIK industry happened
just after the flakey nut brigade was banned from the LASIK industry
meetings.
On 18 Feb 2005 20:52:03 -0800, doctor_my_eye@msn.com wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>Duh, that's a funny one, butthead. And you got something in before
>Beavis.
>
>Since you seem to be obsessed with trolling DoctorMyEye.com, I would
>love to go over my latest web statistics. But, then...you would find
>some way to make an infantile comment about them as well.
>So, I'll leave it at this...DoctorMyEye.com is an informational website
>that performs a public service. The number of hits on the Refractive
>Surgery Shock Syndrome slide presentation has grown exponentially for
>the past 8 months.
>
> I feel that the LASIK industry has become a "mature" industry in
>that just about everyone knows someone who has had LASIK or has a
>family member who knows some one. I also feel that the "anti-RS"
>industry has reached a level of maturity as well. Even LASIK advocates
>like Glenn have tempered their rhetoric enough to emphasize the
>importance of good screenings and competent physicians.
>
> The next battle for the attention of healthy myopes will be when
>ICLs "ramp up" to become more common. By then, I hope that the
>refractive surgery industry has better "protagonists" than you and
>buttwipe. Over the past year most of us have learned that engaging in
>a battle of wits with you blockheads quickly degrades into playing with
>one's own feces. Duh.
>
>serebel wrote:
>in
| |
| doctor_my_eye@msn.com 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| It is obvious that your "war of intimidation" that is waged by
attacking the credibility of the anti-RS movement is painfully old and
inept. Tell me when you got your doctorate, Mister Roiland? Ahh..I
thought so.
There have been some wonderfully well spoken and moderate voices here,
like Bryce Carlson, who have attempted to point a balanced picture of
the pro AND anti-refractive surgery movement. But, ironically, on the
blatantly "pro" side there have been thousands of posts by "Beavis and
Butthead", Aka Ragnar and SERebel, who have collected their meager
thoughts on a daily basis to say such witty things as "You suck!" and
"You ain't no doctor." You are the lowest form of antagonistic
schoolyard bullies, with no form of honor. I have had hundreds of
emails from patients who have thanked me for confronting the bombastic
bullshit that you have posted as a "rebuttal". But, alas, it is boring
to deal with your stupidity. That, more than ever, is the reason why
the activity on this bb has dropped so low. I think that the
antagonism of Ragnar and SEREbel have done more GOOD for the
anti-refractive surgery movement than
hurt it. If the best "pro" arguments still come across as "Yeah. You
suck. You ain't no doctor. You said poo poo. I made you mad enough
to say poo poo. Hee Hee." Then, its easy to understand why any
rational and intelligent human being like Dr. G. would avoid this
cesspool.
Ragnar wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Although he hasn't identified himself below, its from Dr. Minarik. I
> shall paraphrase Dr. Miarik's post below:
in[vbcol=seagreen]
with[vbcol=seagreen]
> - Dr. Kenneth Minarik
>
> If anybody doubts that Minarik is insane, then you too might be
> insane. His poo fetish reminds me of another insane optometrist.
>
> Not only is he insane..he is stupid to attack Serebel. He's got
> nothing to gain and a practice to lose over such a battle.
> Minarik has done a world-class job of destroying whatever shred of
> credibility he might have had left. It's disgraceful that such a
> person is permitted to put the letters DR in front of their name.
>
> Seems coincidental that the maturity of the LASIK industry happened
> just after the flakey nut brigade was banned from the LASIK industry
> meetings.
>
>
> On 18 Feb 2005 20:52:03 -0800, doctor_my_eye@msn.com wrote:
>
find[vbcol=seagreen]
website[vbcol=seagreen]
Refractive[vbcol=seagreen]
for[vbcol=seagreen]
advocates[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
with[vbcol=seagreen]
yours[vbcol=seagreen]
is[vbcol=seagreen]
| |
| serebel 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
|
doctor_my_eye@msn.com wrote:
> There have been some wonderfully well spoken and moderate voices
here,
> like Bryce Carlson, who have attempted to point a balanced picture of
> the pro AND anti-refractive surgery movement. But, ironically, on
the
> blatantly "pro" side there have been thousands of posts by "Beavis
and
> Butthead", Aka Ragnar and SERebel, who have collected their meager
> thoughts on a daily basis to say such witty things as "You suck!" and
> "You ain't no doctor." You are the lowest form of antagonistic
> schoolyard bullies, with no form of honor. I have had hundreds of
> emails from patients who have thanked me for confronting the
bombastic
> bullshit that you have posted as a "rebuttal". But, alas, it is
boring
> to deal with your stupidity. That, more than ever, is the reason why
> the activity on this bb has dropped so low. I think that the
> antagonism of Ragnar and SEREbel have done more GOOD for the
> anti-refractive surgery movement than
> hurt it. If the best "pro" arguments still come across as "Yeah.
You
> suck. You ain't no doctor. You said poo poo. I made you mad enough
> to say poo poo. Hee Hee." Then, its easy to understand why any
> rational and intelligent human being like Dr. G. would avoid this
> cesspool.
> Ragnar wrote:
I[vbcol=seagreen]
before[vbcol=seagreen]
engaging[vbcol=seagreen]
> in
> with
>
Minarik has proven my point again with his usual juvenile response.
I'll let his post speak volumes for itself.
SErebel
|
| |
|
|