|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > March 2005 > The Gift of Vision via alt.lasik.eyes
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
The Gift of Vision via alt.lasik.eyes
|
|
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| For years, this group has been primarily a "sandbox" for the
malcontents. Believe it or not, at one time, this newsgroup generated
more isp complaints than any other group including the kiddie porn and
streisand groups. It got so bad that a major bigshot in the world of
newsgroups started monitoring the group. After 2 years of chatting
with him and pointing out the lunatics in the group, he decided to
have LASIK done himself! He had it done about 8 hours ago... He
had wavefront done on the Visx S4 with intralase (intralase was his
idea, not mine).
Anyway, it's nice to know that this group has stirred up some interest
in LASIK. I'd like to thank the malcontents for being so blatantly
full of it that their posts have had the opposite effect of what they
intended.
One more pair of glasses goes into the garbage can...
| |
| gospa68@aol.com 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| The major bigshot of newsgroups, if he/she truly monitored this site,
was well informed, unlike most consumers having LASIK.
There will be no one to blame. He/she has been fully warned of all the
ugly outcomes that can happen, over and over again.
As I have stated from the beginning, I am not against people choosing
LASIK. I am against people choosing LASIK without being fully informed.
WK
| |
| Sandy - LASIKdisaster.com - LASIKmemorial.com 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
|
Ragnar wrote:
> For years, this group has been primarily a "sandbox" for the
> malcontents. Believe it or not, at one time, this newsgroup
generated
> more isp complaints than any other group including the kiddie porn
and
> streisand groups.
Yeah, and they were nearly all lodged by you, Christopher.
> It got so bad that a major bigshot in the world of
> newsgroups started monitoring the group. After 2 years of chatting
> with him and pointing out the lunatics in the group, he decided to
> have LASIK done himself! He had it done about 8 hours ago... He
> had wavefront done on the Visx S4 with intralase (intralase was his
> idea, not mine).
> Anyway, it's nice to know that this group has stirred up some
interest
> in LASIK. I'd like to thank the malcontents for being so blatantly
> full of it that their posts have had the opposite effect of what they
> intended.
>
> One more pair of glasses goes into the garbage can...
And therein lies the deceit of lasik. All of us threw away our
glasses, Christopher. Many of us cannot be corrected with glasses any
longer and need rigid contact lenses to help with our lasik-induced
vision problems. Some of us are back in glasses. Some are having
cornea transplants and are attempting contact lens fittings over the
grafts--some successfully and some not. Even your bigshot buddy will
end up in reading glasses eventually. It sounds like you still buy
into the "throw away your glasses" line. Haven't you learned anything
over the past two years?
| |
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| That's an odd way to characterize the safest, most predictable, most
popular, and most often performed surgical procedure that has ever
been devised.
On 10 Feb 2005 21:49:44 -0800, gospa68@aol.com wrote:
>The major bigshot of newsgroups, if he/she truly monitored this site,
>was well informed, unlike most consumers having LASIK.
>
>There will be no one to blame. He/she has been fully warned of all the
>ugly outcomes that can happen, over and over again.
>
>As I have stated from the beginning, I am not against people choosing
>LASIK. I am against people choosing LASIK without being fully informed.
>WK
| |
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| On 10 Feb 2005 22:15:17 -0800, "Sandy - LASIKdisaster.com -
LASIKmemorial.com" <sandy@savvysneaks.com> wrote:
>
>Ragnar wrote:
>generated
>and
>
>Yeah, and they were nearly all lodged by you, Christopher.
>
>interest
>
>And therein lies the deceit of lasik. All of us threw away our
>glasses, Christopher. Many of us cannot be corrected with glasses any
>longer and need rigid contact lenses to help with our lasik-induced
>vision problems. Some of us are back in glasses. Some are having
>cornea transplants and are attempting contact lens fittings over the
>grafts--some successfully and some not. Even your bigshot buddy will
>end up in reading glasses eventually. It sounds like you still buy
>into the "throw away your glasses" line. Haven't you learned anything
>over the past two years?
McDonalds has sold over 100,000,000,000
9 people in have died from MadCow disease
I guess that everyone should stop eating hamburgers.
| |
| serebel 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| You're on to some thing here rags, mad cow describes Sandy to a tee.
SErebel
| |
| johnmdoe123@yahoo.com 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
|
serebel wrote:
> You're on to some thing here rags, mad cow describes Sandy to a tee.
>
> SErebel
always so sweet to see you come and pee all over the recent google
posts. ever heard of depends?
| |
| serebel 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
|
johnmdoe123@yahoo.com wrote:
> serebel wrote:
tee.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> always so sweet to see you come and pee all over the recent google
> posts. ever heard of depends?
How well do they work? Are you personally recommending them?
SErebel
| |
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| don't give her any ideas... she will claim she got mad cow disease
from a contaminated blade that was previously used in a meat-packing
plant.
On 11 Feb 2005 18:55:20 -0800, "serebel" <serebel@aol.com> wrote:
>You're on to some thing here rags, mad cow describes Sandy to a tee.
>
>SErebel
| |
| mihkel 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| To Ragnar
Are tou from estonia???
Because it seems to me that you have estonian name.
| |
| Ragnar 2005-03-19, 6:22 pm |
| Very close... Finland.
On 13 Feb 2005 02:44:38 -0800, miku56@yahoo.com (mihkel) wrote:
>To Ragnar
>
>Are tou from estonia???
>Because it seems to me that you have estonian name.
|
| |
|
|