|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > December 2005 > Brent Hanson of LasikFraud "Protects" Refractive Surgeons!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Brent Hanson of LasikFraud "Protects" Refractive Surgeons!
|
|
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-12-21, 11:08 am |
| Brent Hanson of LasikFraud "Protects" Refractive Surgeons!
Can you believe it? Visit
http://www.lasiksucks4u.com/images/hansondocs.pdf and you will see
where Brent Hanson claims that he published story after story about
William Boothe, MD as some sort of act to "protect" Hanson's doctor
and competitor to Dr. Boothe.
Hanson even creates yet another website (LasikQuack.com) where he
published all sorts of bovine fertilizer about Dr. Boothe.
LasikQuack.com was quickly shut down by legal action, but all the
accusations are published over at Dominic Morgan's website. Very
cleaver, Hanson, but you should have told Dom to not label your
package with your own' name. Makes the source a little too obvious,
don't ya think?
Hey! I'm in there too. It seems that Hanson thinks the only source for
public information about his shenanigans is Dr. Boothe.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| lasiksucks4u@yahoo.com 2005-12-21, 11:08 am |
|
Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
> Brent Hanson of LasikFraud "Protects" Refractive Surgeons!
>
> Can you believe it? Visit
> http://www.lasiksucks4u.com/images/hansondocs.pdf and you will see
> where Brent Hanson claims that he published story after story about
> William Boothe, MD as some sort of act to "protect" Hanson's doctor
> and competitor to Dr. Boothe.
Although I appreciate the added link to my website, I do not appreciate
the accusation of collusion however "cleaver" it seems to be to you.
The sole purposes of the posting is to show that the 1st amendment
grants us freedom of speech, which enables us to show truth regardless
of how much "bovine fertilizer" you think it is. Don't drag me into
your petty shenanigans!
Dom
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-12-21, 11:08 am |
| Dom, I referenced you only in passing...only as the person who
published Brent Hanson's bovine fertilizer about Dr. Boothe. I didn't
drag you anywhere. I did not force you to publish Hanson's documents.
It is your prerogative to publish Hanson's docs if you want and I
didn't say you should not.
I don't see where you have any reason to chastise those who comment on
the content of what you have published on your website, whether it be
Hanson's docs or anything else.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-12-21, 11:08 am |
| LOL
I just caught that I had misspelled "clever" to read "cleaver". Jeeze.
That's a problem with spell check. It corrects what you spell, not
what you mean to say. I need to proof-read more.
I see from the Brent Hanson's documents published at Dom's website
that Ariel Berschadsky was in the fray too. It looks like he
"negotiated" which doctors' malpractice accusations he would publish
on his LasikInfoCenter.com website and which he would leave off. I
guess it is just a matter of opinion if this is restraint from
Bershadsky or just selective persecution.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| lasiksucks4u@yahoo.com 2005-12-21, 6:01 pm |
|
Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
> I don't see where you have any reason to chastise those who comment on
> the content of what you have published on your website, whether it be
> Hanson's docs or anything else.
Glenn,
I have no problem with what anyone says about the content of my site.
What I do care about is, you assume in your posting (by telling Brent
to mention to me about naming files) that I conspired with Brent,
whereas I did no such thing. It is my website and my choice as to
content, posting, or anything else regarding it.
Dom
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-12-21, 6:01 pm |
| Sorry Dom if my post was not artfully written and made inaccurate
implications.
It appeared from the content of what you published about Dr. Boothe,
Brent Hanson's own doctors, Ariel Berschadsky, and others, that items
stated to be kept confidential and items that only the principles in
the dispute would have had are included. But you can clarify any
confusion by stating who were the sources of the documents (if you
wish). Did Brent Hanson supply anything? Did Ariel Berschadsky? I
really doubt if Dr. Boothe would have given you anything (no offense
intended).
There is no need to get wrapped up in whether or not you did or did
not get documents from Hanson, Berschadsky, or anyone else named in
the publication. It is the content of what you have published that I
find most interesting.
To think that Brent Hanson would claim that his "attacks" on Dr.
Boothe were in defense of his own doctors is really quite surprising a
justification...especially considering Hanson's history. The
documented jockeying between the players makes daytime soap operas
seem tame by comparison. The fact that Hanson's buddy Berschadsky
publishes negative information at LasikInfoCenter about Hanson's
doctor who Hanson "defended" is interesting too. Oh what a tangled web
we weave....
BTW, Your websites LasikSucks4U and FlawedLasik are two sites that I
refer people who want to know how bad an outcome can be. You had a
lousy time of it. We also list your main website on USAEyes.org
(http://www.usaeyes.org/faq/subjects/bad_lasik.htm)
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| lasiksucks4u@yahoo.com 2005-12-21, 6:01 pm |
| Glenn,
I considered the documents mentioned are marked confidential (You
should have seen my website before I had (under court order) to remove
the information relating to my doctors). Document content aside, what
galls me is this is no different than the legal issues in my case
regarding the right to free speech, and the fact these doctors
apparently have some influence as to what can and cannot be posted on
the internet. I've been shut down 3 times (the doctors and their
attorneys intimidated and threatened my hosting companies with with
lawsuits) already, and am currently appealing a judge's order to remove
all reference of my doctors from my website. My rights have been
severely denied and violated, and I believe Brent's were as well.
As far as document content, I don't believe so much 'fertilizer' can be
fabricated without truth behind it. I don't know Dr. Boothe
personally, nor any of the other doctors mentioned on my websites that
have had lawsuits, but I firmly believe the LASIK industry has withheld
a sustantial portion of truth from the public. The list of casualties
is growing...
Regarding my websites, thank you for the links, and the referrals.
www.lasiksucks4u.com has been totally revised, and expanded to cover
not only what happened in my situation, but I am striving to cover the
whole LASIK industry.
Dom
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2005-12-21, 6:01 pm |
| I'm all for free speech too. I think people who have had bad outcomes
should be able to tell their story and offer their opinions.
What the documents you published regarding Brent Hanson, Ariel
Berschadsky, and others show is that THEY decided what to do and what
not to do regarding their websites. They each either voluntarily
responded to Dr. Boothe's requests, or made a binding agreement with
the court. Heck, Berschadsky is an attorney and he could have fought
anything with anyone if he had wanted. Instead he complied...somewhat.
I am a victim of Brent Hanson's outright lies. Take a look at
http://glennhagele.com/brenthanson and judge for yourself. Does he
have a "right" to do this. No, but he will until I take action to stop
him.
I'm not the least bit sympathetic to Hanson and IMO his justification
for attacking Dr. Boothe is pure bovine fertilizer. Come on, if Hanson
didn't want bad things said about his doctor then you would think he
would get is buddy Ariel Berschadsky to take the negative information
about his doctor off of Berschadsky's LasikInfoCenter website.
While you say you have been shut down three times, you also have been
revived at least as many times. You have at least two websites up and
going and they have a lot of information that is either factual or
clearly opinion (such as your opinion of me). I really doubt that a
judge has any bias toward or against you or toward or against
refractive surgery. If you are within the law, you have little to fear
from a judge. If anybody is outside the law then that portion should
be removed or edited. What is in or out is often decided by a judge,
and I think that really is the best arbitrator.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
|
| |
|
|