Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > January 2005





Pages: [1] 2

Posts(7)January 31, 2005, 11:54 amTraditional LASIK vs alternatives that address limitations
Posts(2)January 31, 2005, 11:54 amLASIK Patients! - testimony by former FDA official
Posts(2)January 31, 2005, 11:54 amGlenn, you are a fraud.
Posts(3)January 31, 2005, 11:54 amGlenn, why do you continue to evade the issue?
Posts(31)January 31, 2005, 11:54 amWhat about the future?
Posts(9)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amDoes anyone have opinions on : CK (Conductive Keratoplasty) ?
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Are there any other mountains you'd like to pass off as a mole hill?
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Are there any other mountains you'd like to pass off as a mole hill?
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Are there any other mountains you'd like to pass off as a mole hill?
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Are there any other mountains you'd like to pass off as a mole hill?
Posts(22)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amLies of Gemoules - coming very soon to a newsgroup near you.
Posts(17)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amQuestion for Glenn
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Question for Glenn re: IRS classification
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amPerry Mason is at it again...
Posts(2)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amHere's an oily regimen
Posts(8)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amfloppy disk - should I care?
Posts(3)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amWavefront Lasik will now treat greater astigmatism
Posts(1)January 31, 2005, 11:53 amRe: Considering LASIK in Phoenix, Arizona
Posts(15)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amDr. Gemoules is a widely-known internet liar
Posts(7)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amDr. Mengele's contact lenses
Posts(1)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(2)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amEVERY Chord and Scale for guitar- LITERALLY!!
Posts(14)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amRagnar has been very good for business.
Posts(1)January 28, 2005, 8:11 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(11)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amPost Lasik Asymmetric Pupil Size
Posts(9)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amT +5 days
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(3)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amRagnar is a widely-known internet liar
Posts(7)January 27, 2005, 8:53 amSalmon Oil
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRagnar is a widely-known internet liar
Posts(35)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amLet's see if this one gets by the mythical kill filter of Dr. Gemoules
Posts(24)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amT +1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: More on Fox News Coverage of Alcon Problem - plus gossip
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: More on Fox News Coverage of Alcon Problem - plus gossip
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(14)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amLawsuits related to refractive surgery on the rise
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(5)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amI HAD MY LASER DONE 11/7/04----NEED SOME OPINIONS
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T +1 day from surgery/OK to Drive?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: T+1 day from surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amProfitable Domain Name For Sale
Posts(3)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amPatients Experiencing Extreme Light Sensitivity after IntraLase LASIK
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(3)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amFailed LASIKs - Details of Civil Action Against Alcon
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(9)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amBilateral serous macular detachment following laser in situ keratomileusis
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: A LASIK pimp-cum-magician demonstrates his favorite tactic: Misdirection
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(3)January 27, 2005, 8:52 amConsidering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(4)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amBarnard... among others
Posts(2)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amMore bad press in England
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(2)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amConsumers gaining more options for correcting vision without surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(2)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRussian Diplomat's Vision Restored With Intacs
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amMore on Fox News Coverage of Alcon Problem
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amEthical Issues Facing Ophthalmology Today
Posts(2)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amBye bye CRSQA?
Posts(3)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amT -1 days to surgery
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amLASIK terms wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized cause confusion
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: Considering Refractive Surgery? Consider this!
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(12)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amDamaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amLegal and financial problems are focus of ophthalmology today
Posts(1)January 27, 2005, 8:51 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 20, 2005, 7:07 amA LASIK pimp-cum-magician demonstrates his favorite tactic: Misdirection
Posts(9)January 20, 2005, 4:07 amAbout "defective" equpment
Posts(10)January 20, 2005, 4:07 amI am sickened...
Posts(1)January 20, 2005, 4:07 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 20, 2005, 2:08 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 20, 2005, 2:08 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(9)January 19, 2005, 10:08 pmRecommendations in LA Area? Costs?
Posts(9)January 19, 2005, 10:08 pmAnother complaint about CRSQA "certified" surgeon at RipoffReport.com
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 10:08 pmRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(6)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmWhy would Dr. Maloney care about a new pupillometer?
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:12 pmRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amConsumer Alert: Alcon LADARVision
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(2)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amHagele's "position" is on his knees in front of the well-hung LASIK industry
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amSpaghetti logic at its finest; meatballs optional
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:07 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 7:07 amRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(8)January 19, 2005, 4:07 amHagele proven a liar by his own "certified" surgeons
Posts(8)January 19, 2005, 4:07 amSuccessful LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(10)January 19, 2005, 2:11 am12 Year PRK Data - Only 51% Satisfied
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 2:11 amRe: If CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a posit
Posts(1)January 19, 2005, 2:11 amIf CRSQA is a patient advocacy organization, it is time for Hagele to make a position
Posts(6)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmHope for Post-LASIK Ectasia
Posts(34)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmSurgery on one eye at a time
Posts(4)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmICL?
Posts(12)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmQuestion for Barnard
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(4)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmLASIK Warnings from the US Federal Government
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 10:11 pmRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(3)January 18, 2005, 10:10 pmCreative pimpistry alert! Creative pimpistry alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 10:10 pmRe: Creative pimpistry alert! Creative pimpistry alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 10:10 pmRe: LASIK Pimp alert! LASIK Pimp alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(4)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmEBW deposition re: Alcon -- LASIK pimp Glenn is sweating bullets
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmLASIK Pimp alert! LASIK Pimp alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmRe: Damaged LADARvision Patients? Where are they?
Posts(5)January 18, 2005, 7:13 pmLASIK Warnings from the US Federal Government
Posts(3)January 18, 2005, 11:11 amThis N.G has gone to the dogs!
Posts(19)January 18, 2005, 11:11 amThe information Glenn Hagele posts may be hazardous to your eye health!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 11:11 amRe: Moron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 7:09 amMoron Alert! Moron Alert!
Posts(10)January 18, 2005, 2:09 amHad lasik done yesterday
Posts(2)January 18, 2005, 2:09 amRK too
Posts(1)January 18, 2005, 2:09 amLIP lost in the fog; send comprehension!
Posts(23)January 18, 2005, 2:09 amConsumer alert: Alcon LADARVision
Posts(1)January 17, 2005, 10:08 pmPatients' Opinons Rule!
Posts(1)January 17, 2005, 10:08 pmLASIK Warnings from the US Federal Government
Posts(1)January 17, 2005, 10:08 pmLASIK Warnings from the US Federal Government
Posts(7)January 17, 2005, 7:10 pmObjectively measuring LASIK outcomes
Posts(33)January 16, 2005, 10:08 pmT -10 days for LASIK
Posts(10)January 16, 2005, 10:08 pmOff-label use of dilating drops to get patients qualified for wavefront LASIK
Posts(2)January 16, 2005, 10:08 pmRags on dope
Posts(1)January 16, 2005, 10:08 pmLASIK Pimp Alert! LASIK Pimp Alert!
Posts(8)January 16, 2005, 7:10 pmThe list grows...
Posts(24)January 16, 2005, 11:08 amNotice to Christopher Roiland and Glenn Hagele from Ron Link
Posts(4)January 16, 2005, 2:08 amRebecca: "A 'Good Outcome' Is Meaningless"
Posts(4)January 15, 2005, 7:10 pm5 Years Post LASIK
Posts(1)January 15, 2005, 7:10 pmSleaze alert! Slease Alert!
Posts(1)January 15, 2005, 7:10 pmAn open call for comment! (mostly open, anyway)
Posts(6)January 15, 2005, 2:13 amLASIK doc talks strategies to reduce legal risks
Posts(11)January 14, 2005, 10:12 pm**Attention Dr. G** or Glenn or Doctormyeye
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 7:14 pmAJO study compares lasik damage to PRK damage
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 7:14 pmComparison of two methods for estimating residual stromal bed thickness before repeat
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 7:14 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 14, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 10:11 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 10:11 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:10 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:10 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:10 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:10 pmRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 11:11 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(26)January 13, 2005, 7:09 amQuestions regarding heal time....
Posts(1)January 13, 2005, 7:09 amFor Barnard
Posts(13)January 13, 2005, 2:08 amThe Effect (or lack of) Flap Thickness on Negative LASIK Visual Outcomes
Posts(6)January 12, 2005, 7:12 pmLasik Study @ Stanford University - Manche?
Posts(10)January 12, 2005, 11:09 amTop 10 reasons to get LASIK right now!
Posts(7)January 12, 2005, 7:11 amWhat role does the CRSQA play when a surgeon misleads patients?
Posts(3)January 12, 2005, 7:11 amNews Bulletin - people see better with RGPs than Glasses!
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 7:11 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(5)January 12, 2005, 7:11 amI disagree with SERebel here...
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 7:11 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 12, 2005, 2:10 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(7)January 12, 2005, 2:10 amQuestion for WizKid
Posts(3)January 11, 2005, 7:13 pm1-year post-LASEK feedback
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:13 pmOff Label Use of Approved Devices
Posts(3)January 11, 2005, 11:09 amNothing like posting lists rules....
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 11:09 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:09 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(1)January 11, 2005, 7:09 amRe: Had another one this morning. - major Gemoules flaw demonstrated here...
Posts(3)January 11, 2005, 4:07 amMiss Knapp
Copyright 2003 - 2010 pahealthsystems.com