Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > December 2004 > Ragnar defends shoddy surgeons





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Ragnar defends shoddy surgeons
Dr. Leukoma

2004-12-30, 11:09 am

Ragnar <ragnarsuomi@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:pe16t0lbjjt5rvt0mj1ipriij7e4htsqp0@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:16:07 GMT, "Dr. Leukoma" <drg@leukoma.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> A person with a prescription of -9.50 with 6.5mm pupils... this person
> would have had a dramatic improvement in the quality of their life had
> they gone for the surgery.
> Thanks to Dr. Gemoules and his quack ideas, this person will not have
> surgery. Apparently Dr. Gemoules never heard of transition zones when
> doing LASIK for patients with high prescriptions. He also forgot the
> alternative or PRK - although in this case, I don't think PRK would be
> the better option.
>
> I wouldn't say he was a great candidate for LASIK, but weighing the
> benefits vs the risks, he's a good candidate.
>


EOM.

DrG
Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com