| Ragnar 2004-12-27, 4:08 am |
| Steve... don't fall for the slick chatter from a professional
con-artist.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:41:28 -0500, Steve <stopspam@bellsouth.com>
wrote:
>On 22 Dec 2004 14:15:11 -0800, "Ron Link" <ronjohnlink@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks, Ron--and I am very sorry that you didn't have a good outcome.
>I do believe that surgicaleyes.com has done a tremendous amount of
>good work over the years and I commend you for that--I just don't
>think the site is the most appropriate place for someone who is
>considering refractive surgery to visit to learn about the risks and
>benefits of the procedure unless that person understands the inherent
>bias of those who contribute to the site.
>
>By the way, my opinion about your case is based on what I've read
>here and you're absolutely correct--I haven't read everything (and
>wouldn't claim that I have) and certainly don't know all the facts.
>Based on what I have read and know, though, I don't see much of a
>chance of your lawsuit surviving summary judgment, primarily because
>Glenn has offered to retract any statement which he's made that you
>can prove is false. As far as whether my opinion is "professional" or
>not, I'll leave that call for you and anyone reading to judge. I will
>say that I've successfully defended several slander/libel cases in my
>state--and all were won on summary judgment (i.e., they were not
>allowed to get to a jury).
>
>I hope you and everyone reading this has a wonderful Holiday season.
|