Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > December 2004 > LASIK Reduces Supply of Usable Donor Corneas





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author LASIK Reduces Supply of Usable Donor Corneas
Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM

2004-12-16, 9:25 am

LASIK may hurt donor corneas

Albuquerque Journal (New Mexico)
Jackie Jadrnak Journal Staff Writer

* Doctor says weakened spot may rip during removal for transplant

If you have LASIK surgery to correct your eyesight, a little semicircular
line, a sliver of a healed spot, is left behind on your cornea.

It's not a big deal. You can function perfectly well with it there.

But it could make a difference if you donate your corneas for a transplant
after you die.

When the corneas are removed and prepared for the transplant, the procedure
can cause that weakened spot to rip apart, according to Dr. V. Vinod Mootha,
assistant professor of ophthalmology at the university of New Mexico.

"The flap can come loose" during a transplantation, he said. "It's not the
end of the world ... but it's not ideal."

A surgeon can stitch the flap back down and continue with the transplant, he
said. But, with the supply of corneas actually exceeding the demand for
transplants, people in eye banks prefer to separate corneas that had LASIK
out of the pool for transplants, said Mootha, who is medical director for
the New Mexico Lions Club Eye Bank.

He and his research colleagues may have come up with an approach to screen
those donated corneas.

In an article published in the May issue of Archives of Ophthalmology, the
research team reported that they were able to identify 23 of 26 corneas (88
percent) that had undergone a LASIK procedure by using specular microscopy.
That microscope, which uses reflected light, revealed bright particles in
the corneas that had the laser surgery. Those particles -- keratocytes --
may be produced as part of the healing process, Mootha said.

Only one of the 26 corneas that did not have LASIK showed those particles.

In comparison, examination with a slitlamp microscope -- similar to one used
in many clinical eye exams -- revealed an obvious flap edge in barely half
of the corneas that had them, he said. "Sometimes it's a little subtle,"
Mootha noted.

Eye banks usually have both microscopes on hand, he said. The specular
microscope usually is used to study the innermost layer of the cornea to
make sure it has appropriate density of cells, he said.

An Albuquerque company is developing a computer-based system that may use
discoveries from this research to produce computer screening of donor
corneas, he added.

"This is the largest study to look at human corneas that have had successful
LASIK surgery," Mootha said. "It shows they tolerate the surgery well."

About 50,000 to 60,000 corneas are donated nationwide each year, he said.
About 40,000 cornea transplant operations are performed each year, with the
remainder of the corneas either used for research or shipped to other
countries, he said.

The most common condition to cause someone to need a transplant is
keratoconus, in which a person's cornea is cone-shaped instead of spherical,
according to Mootha.

Fuchs' dystrophy, in which the inner layer of the cornea is weak and
swollen, is another condition that can create a need for a new cornea, he
said.

Cornea transplants have an 80 percent success rate and last for about 10 or
15 years, he said. After that time, people might need a second transplant,
he added.

Mootha said he doesn't want to discourage people who have had LASIK from
donating their corneas. The tissues still can be useful in research, he
said.

It would be helpful, though, if their family members could inform someone
when the corneas are being harvested that they have been subject to laser
surgery, Mootha said.


RM

2004-12-16, 9:26 am

This is incredible... you are suggesting that people don't have LASIK
done because it will make their corneas unsuable for corneal
transplants? Excuse me... but I'm not a pile of spare parts for
someone else.

Incidentally.. I'm not sure if this is still true, but not long ago,
corneas were taken from cadavers without getting permission nor even
notifying the next of kin.


On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 16:09:15 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM"
<brent@nospam_lasikfraud.com> wrote:

>LASIK may hurt donor corneas
>
>Albuquerque Journal (New Mexico)
>Jackie Jadrnak Journal Staff Writer
>
>* Doctor says weakened spot may rip during removal for transplant
>
>If you have LASIK surgery to correct your eyesight, a little semicircular
>line, a sliver of a healed spot, is left behind on your cornea.
>
>It's not a big deal. You can function perfectly well with it there.
>
>But it could make a difference if you donate your corneas for a transplant
>after you die.
>
>When the corneas are removed and prepared for the transplant, the procedure
>can cause that weakened spot to rip apart, according to Dr. V. Vinod Mootha,
>assistant professor of ophthalmology at the university of New Mexico.
>
>"The flap can come loose" during a transplantation, he said. "It's not the
>end of the world ... but it's not ideal."
>
>A surgeon can stitch the flap back down and continue with the transplant, he
>said. But, with the supply of corneas actually exceeding the demand for
>transplants, people in eye banks prefer to separate corneas that had LASIK
>out of the pool for transplants, said Mootha, who is medical director for
>the New Mexico Lions Club Eye Bank.
>
>He and his research colleagues may have come up with an approach to screen
>those donated corneas.
>
>In an article published in the May issue of Archives of Ophthalmology, the
>research team reported that they were able to identify 23 of 26 corneas (88
>percent) that had undergone a LASIK procedure by using specular microscopy.
>That microscope, which uses reflected light, revealed bright particles in
>the corneas that had the laser surgery. Those particles -- keratocytes --
>may be produced as part of the healing process, Mootha said.
>
>Only one of the 26 corneas that did not have LASIK showed those particles.
>
>In comparison, examination with a slitlamp microscope -- similar to one used
>in many clinical eye exams -- revealed an obvious flap edge in barely half
>of the corneas that had them, he said. "Sometimes it's a little subtle,"
>Mootha noted.
>
>Eye banks usually have both microscopes on hand, he said. The specular
>microscope usually is used to study the innermost layer of the cornea to
>make sure it has appropriate density of cells, he said.
>
>An Albuquerque company is developing a computer-based system that may use
>discoveries from this research to produce computer screening of donor
>corneas, he added.
>
>"This is the largest study to look at human corneas that have had successful
>LASIK surgery," Mootha said. "It shows they tolerate the surgery well."
>
>About 50,000 to 60,000 corneas are donated nationwide each year, he said.
>About 40,000 cornea transplant operations are performed each year, with the
>remainder of the corneas either used for research or shipped to other
>countries, he said.
>
>The most common condition to cause someone to need a transplant is
>keratoconus, in which a person's cornea is cone-shaped instead of spherical,
>according to Mootha.
>
>Fuchs' dystrophy, in which the inner layer of the cornea is weak and
>swollen, is another condition that can create a need for a new cornea, he
>said.
>
>Cornea transplants have an 80 percent success rate and last for about 10 or
>15 years, he said. After that time, people might need a second transplant,
>he added.
>
>Mootha said he doesn't want to discourage people who have had LASIK from
>donating their corneas. The tissues still can be useful in research, he
>said.
>
>It would be helpful, though, if their family members could inform someone
>when the corneas are being harvested that they have been subject to laser
>surgery, Mootha said.
>


Glenn - USAEyes.org

2004-12-16, 9:26 am

That is a rather odd motivation for taking good care of yourself -
your parts will be needed by the next person.

While it is true that patients who have had LASIK are not viable
cornea donors, many, many, many more people who would be eligible do
not donate for religious or similar reasons. In the whole world only
about 8 million have had LASIK or PRK, there are more than 250 million
people in the US alone.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.
serebel

2004-12-16, 10:08 pm

Funny, I thought we OWNED our corneas. Boy do I feel guilty.


SErebel

Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com