|
Home > Archive > Lasik Eyes Surgery > November 2004 > Hagele is opposed to medical articles written by doctors
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Hagele is opposed to medical articles written by doctors
|
|
| Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM 2004-11-14, 11:09 am |
| Hagele claims that medical articles from refractiver journals are "spam"
when they are supplied by Mrs. Sandy Keller.
This is really more HageleHam from HatefulHagele who makes his living
pimping substandard surgeons.
"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:f3h4p099gu6mk0rd9liig9oplrt5crf2bm@4ax.com...
"Anything LASIK" is not necessarily an issue being discussed.
Keller's SandySpam is never a relevant extension to an existing
thread, just article after article she found somewhere that she cut
and paste.
Of course they are not always something that appear detrimental to
LASIK. Keller may think they are, but quite often the information is
so old, irrelevant, or has the potential to affect so few people that
it is just useless noise. In other words, SandySpam.
On occasion something worthwhile is a part of Keller's SandySpam.
It's rare, but she does prove that i f you throw enough at the wall,
something will stick.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Glenn - USAEyes.org 2004-11-14, 11:09 am |
| No Hanson, that is not what I said. I said that quite often the
information that is SandySpam is so old, irrelevant, or has the
potential to affect so few people that it is just useless noise.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
| |
| Ragnar Suomi 2004-11-14, 11:09 am |
| I think you are missing the reason for Glenn coming up with the
descriptive phrase of Sandy Spam. He wasn't doing that to be
childish or cruel. Her name is Sandy and spam is commonly understood
to refer to incessant, repeticious, voluminous quantittes of
"information" that nobody requested or wanted. At the time Glenn came
up with the phrase "Sandy Spam" she was certainly guilty of spamming
the newsgroup. She has ceased spamming for several months now..
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:51:36 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM"
<brent@nospam_lasikfraud.com> wrote:
>Hagele claims that medical articles from refractiver journals are "spam"
>when they are supplied by Mrs. Sandy Keller.
>
>This is really more HageleHam from HatefulHagele who makes his living
>pimping substandard surgeons.
>
>"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
>news:f3h4p099gu6mk0rd9liig9oplrt5crf2bm@4ax.com...
>"Anything LASIK" is not necessarily an issue being discussed.
>Keller's SandySpam is never a relevant extension to an existing
>thread, just article after article she found somewhere that she cut
>and paste.
>
>Of course they are not always something that appear detrimental to
>LASIK. Keller may think they are, but quite often the information is
>so old, irrelevant, or has the potential to affect so few people that
>it is just useless noise. In other words, SandySpam.
>
>On occasion something worthwhile is a part of Keller's SandySpam.
>It's rare, but she does prove that i f you throw enough at the wall,
>something will stick.
>
>Glenn Hagele
>Executive Director
>Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
>
>Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
>http://www.USAEyes.org
>http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
>I am not a doctor.
>
|
| |
|
|