Lasik Eyes Surgery - Gemoules' cronies to get busted

Author

Gemoules' cronies to get busted

Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM

2004-10-25, 7:11 pm

Dr. Gemoules (aka "Leukoma") has a history of promoting TLC Laser Centers,
as has been documented here:

"not only did I co-manage patients with TLC Arlington, I was also on their
optometric advisory board. Therefore, I can speak with authority when I say
that both the staff and the center were a class act in every way."
www.lasikfraud.com/whistleblower.html

However, Richard Zickefoose managed to make an incriminating tape that
proves Gemoules to be wrong in his assessment of TLC:
http://www.lasikfraud.com/incrimina...g_sky_tape.html

Richard had filed a lawsuit against TLC, and reached a settlement.
Interestingly enough, TLC tried to renege on their payout after I made the
following posting on Yahoo:
http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/b...29514&mid=19760

TLC tried to renege after the marketing folks discovered that the contract
had no gag clause. The judge decided he didn't care for TLC welshing on
their payment, so he ordered TLC to pay up. Since there is no gag clause,
Richard is free to do whatever he likes. It just so happens that a Chicago
affiliate of a national news network is doing a pro-consumer lasik story
later this fall, and Richard is going to turn the tape over to the reporter
who is investigating the story.

Poor Dr. Gemoules... his favorite company is going to get busted.

Glenn - USAEyes.org

2004-10-25, 7:11 pm

I question for you Hanson:

If TLC is such a bad company with such bad doctors, why do you keep
attacking them because they wouldn't do more surgery on you? I mean,
if they are so bad, why would you want them doing surgery on you?

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.

Rebecca

2004-10-25, 7:11 pm

"Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM" <brent@nospam_lasikfraud.com> wrote in message news:<BvKdna7pJP_E1-DcRVn-pw@pghconnect.com>...
> Dr. Gemoules (aka "Leukoma") has a history of promoting TLC Laser Centers,
> as has been documented here:
>
> "not only did I co-manage patients with TLC Arlington, I was also on their
> optometric advisory board. Therefore, I can speak with authority when I say
> that both the staff and the center were a class act in every way."
> www.lasikfraud.com/whistleblower.html
>
> However, Richard Zickefoose managed to make an incriminating tape that
> proves Gemoules to be wrong in his assessment of TLC:
> http://www.lasikfraud.com/incrimina...g_sky_tape.html
>
> Richard had filed a lawsuit against TLC, and reached a settlement.
> Interestingly enough, TLC tried to renege on their payout after I made the
> following posting on Yahoo:
> http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/b...29514&mid=19760
>
> TLC tried to renege after the marketing folks discovered that the contract
> had no gag clause. The judge decided he didn't care for TLC welshing on
> their payment, so he ordered TLC to pay up. Since there is no gag clause,
> Richard is free to do whatever he likes. It just so happens that a Chicago
> affiliate of a national news network is doing a pro-consumer lasik story
> later this fall, and Richard is going to turn the tape over to the reporter
> who is investigating the story.
>
> Poor Dr. Gemoules... his favorite company is going to get busted.

To hear you talk, one would think DrG is sending patients in droves to
TLC, which to my knowledge is not the case and never was.

I can't imagine who you think is benefitting from the trouble you go
to to cobble together any odd mismatch of things and write a
commentary around it in an attempt to badmouth him. Patients who need
and want to avail themselves of his skills in fitting refractive
patients with contact lenses are not likely to be deterred, and if
they were, you would not have done them a favour.

Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM

2004-10-26, 2:08 am

Has Glenn gone senile? "I question for you Hanson".

I initially put up my web site to complain about TLC's bogus "lifetime
commitment". I later learned that TLC's refusal to honor to honor their
"lifetime commitment." The tape demonstrates another instance of TLC
refusal to honor their "lifetime commitment". What is really ironic, is
that before the TLC employee goes berserk and hangs up on the patient, is
that the TLC "lifetime commitment" can be heard in voice-over on the
telephone.

Hagele really ought to get some help for his senility. Or perhaps, he never
studied grammar in elementary school.

www.lasikfraud.com

"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
news:27lqn0lheu6j3fbmihkljfi6fiekv8g92g@4ax.com...
I question for you Hanson:

If TLC is such a bad company with such bad doctors, why do you keep
attacking them because they wouldn't do more surgery on you? I mean,
if they are so bad, why would you want them doing surgery on you?

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.

Ragnar Suomi

2004-10-26, 2:08 am

Here's something for you to check up on. About 2 years ago, LVI was
the LASER Vision Institute, then they went bankrupt and became the
LASIK Vision Institute. I wonder if all contracts/agreements made
with the LASER Vision Institute became null and void after the change.

You might have mentioned that LVI's low-price option includes no
enhancements - and the enhancements cost an extra $700 per eye... and
LVI has a 20% enhancement rate which is absurd - nobody else has much
higher than an 11% rate and a good surgeon will have about a 3% rate.
You can bet that the people requiring LVI enhancements are the ones
that took the "low-cost" option. So there's an extra $1400 to pay
up.. so much for $299.

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:36:52 -0700, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.COM"
<brent@nospam_lasikfraud.com> wrote:

>Has Glenn gone senile? "I question for you Hanson".
>
>I initially put up my web site to complain about TLC's bogus "lifetime
>commitment". I later learned that TLC's refusal to honor to honor their
>"lifetime commitment." The tape demonstrates another instance of TLC
>refusal to honor their "lifetime commitment". What is really ironic, is
>that before the TLC employee goes berserk and hangs up on the patient, is
>that the TLC "lifetime commitment" can be heard in voice-over on the
>telephone.
>
>Hagele really ought to get some help for his senility. Or perhaps, he never
>studied grammar in elementary school.
>
>www.lasikfraud.com
>
>"Glenn - USAEyes.org" <glenn.hageleSTOPSPAM@USAEyes.org> wrote in message
>news:27lqn0lheu6j3fbmihkljfi6fiekv8g92g@4ax.com...
>I question for you Hanson:
>
>If TLC is such a bad company with such bad doctors, why do you keep
>attacking them because they wouldn't do more surgery on you? I mean,
>if they are so bad, why would you want them doing surgery on you?
>
>Glenn Hagele
>Executive Director
>Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
>
>Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
>http://www.USAEyes.org
>http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
>I am not a doctor.
>