| Author |
OT...ta...daaa...top posters of lupus newsgroup
|
|
|
| Google is now tracking top posters...
All time top posters (as of sometime in December)
4121 BJ.
4024 kcdoc.
3195 andy..
2409 rojak...(janers)
2200 sandra
1747 noway..(Sharon)
1619 pottings...(Bev)
1521 JR
1129 Shelagh
| |
|
| hmmm , Big sister is watching you. But the shares are now over $200.00 .
Same time last year share was $85.00 each.
Bruce On. " I have $10.00 on J to win this month  ) "
"J" <example@example.net> wrote in message
news:41DBC6AC.B6F41E7B@execulink.com...
> Google is now tracking top posters...
> All time top posters (as of sometime in December)
> 4121 BJ.
> 4024 kcdoc.
> 3195 andy..
> 2409 rojak...(janers)
> 2200 sandra
> 1747 noway..(Sharon)
> 1619 pottings...(Bev)
> 1521 JR
> 1129 Shelagh
>
| |
| Michael Roeper 2005-01-06, 7:09 am |
| Hell, I had to be in there at least twice????
Michael
"J" <example@example.net> wrote in message
news:41DBC6AC.B6F41E7B@execulink.com...
> Google is now tracking top posters...
> All time top posters (as of sometime in December)
> 4121 BJ.
> 4024 kcdoc.
> 3195 andy..
> 2409 rojak...(janers)
> 2200 sandra
> 1747 noway..(Sharon)
> 1619 pottings...(Bev)
> 1521 JR
> 1129 Shelagh
>
| |
| Beverley 2005-01-06, 7:14 pm |
| I guess I "talk" too much. LOL
Bev
"J" <example@example.net> wrote in message
news:41DBC6AC.B6F41E7B@execulink.com...
> Google is now tracking top posters...
> All time top posters (as of sometime in December)
> 4121 BJ.
> 4024 kcdoc.
> 3195 andy..
> 2409 rojak...(janers)
> 2200 sandra
> 1747 noway..(Sharon)
> 1619 pottings...(Bev)
> 1521 JR
> 1129 Shelagh
>
| |
| Shelagh 2005-01-06, 7:14 pm |
| Those can't be from last year cause JR didn't post most of last year if I
recall rightly?
I too don't believe I was one of the top posters of last year, perhaps the
year before?
.... and where is J's name ... she should be the top name IMO, lol!!?
~ Shelagh
"Michael Roeper" wrote in message[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hell, I had to be in there at least twice????
>
> Michael
>
> "J" wrote in message
| |
|
| Shelagh wrote:
> Those can't be from last year cause JR didn't post most of last year if I
> recall rightly?
> I too don't believe I was one of the top posters of last year, perhaps the
> year before?
> ... and where is J's name ...
It's *all time" since the group was created December 1996 - the only post that
year - was by Jonathan Grobes to announce the group and a Charter (of
sorts). I can't remember how I found those stats so I can't find them again.
<g>.
Maybe I removed my name but I wasn't near the top. That's because the highest
number would have been the people here the longest, unless they leave (or
change their name), then as each year continues, their name will go lower on
the list.
Archive (summary of # of posts /month) each year.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
1996
1
1997 4 15 33 54 44 45
53 40 47 55 43 47
1998 68 51 149 116 114 198 187
232 273 239 398 502
1999 514 584 975 602 704 555 521 487
461 392 519 522
2000 571 584 648 805 1069 930 1057 789
1013 859 859 935
2001 752 696 605 711 791 868 914 1079
771 1075 978 910
2002 2300 1456 1715 2336 1540 1835 1667 1495 1432
1393 1676 1780
2003 2091 2165 2749 1456 1118 1037 1078 1049
1112 807 690 914
2004 1264 800 945 818 825 647 461 462
432 460 349 245
2005 118
The above will probably post a *mess*, since it's in table format (and I tried
to reformat it, so the columns line up and easier to read instead all squished
to the left), but we can see that year 2002 and 2003 were very much busier
than year 2001 and 2004.
| |
|
| J wrote:
> Archive (summary of # of posts /month) each year.
>
> Archive
>
> Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
> 1996 1
> 1997 4 15 33 54 44 45 53 40 47 55 43 47
> 1998 68 51 149 116 114 198 187 232 273 239 398 502
> 1999 514 584 975 602 704 555 521 487 461 392 519 522
> 2000 571 584 648 805 1069 930 1057 789 1013 859 859 935
> 2001 752 696 605 711 791 868 914 1079 771 1075 978 910
> 2002 2300 1456 1715 2336 1540 1835 1667 1495 1432 1393 1676 1780
> 2003 2091 2165 2749 1456 1118 1037 1078 1049 1112 807 690 914
> 2004 1264 800 945 818 825 647 461 462 432 460 349 245
> 2005 118
>
> The above will probably post a *mess*, since it's in table format (and I tried
> to reformat it, so the columns line up and easier to read instead all squished
> to the left), but we can see that year 2002 and 2003 were very much busier
> than year 2001 and 2004.
| |
|
| Bruce wrote:
> hmmm , Big sister is watching you. But the shares are now over $200.00 .
> Same time last year share was $85.00 each.
I'd sell now. All over Usenet, I complaints about new Google interface.
(people trying to post through Google)
> Bruce On. " I have $10.00 on J to win this month ) "
Could be. Since it's my fault about the roll call and then I try to reply to
all of them if I can.
Hugs from J
| |
|
| In article <41DD84BC.BC618B2@execulink.com>, J <example@example.net>
wrote
[]
>The above will probably post a *mess*,
Yup
Do your stats include postings to this group only, or to all groups?
--
Andy Taylor [Chair, N E Lupus Group]
See http://www.northeastlupus.org.uk for more!
| |
|
| Andy wrote:
> Do your stats include postings to this group only,
Yes. Some may be crossposted though.
J
|
|
|
|