|
Home > Archive > Impotence Support > February 2007 > Cialis vs Levitra
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Floppy 2007-02-06, 9:36 pm |
| Is there anyone here who has experience with both of these drugs? Did you
note a better responce to one or the other?
Are these drugs one of those things where YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary)?
Thanks.
| |
| d hamilton 2007-02-06, 9:36 pm |
| On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 07:37:56 -0500, "Floppy"
<floppynomore@everywhere.igo> wrote:
>Is there anyone here who has experience with both of these drugs? Did you
>note a better responce to one or the other?
>
>Are these drugs one of those things where YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary)?
>
>Thanks.
>
I believe these fall into the YMMV category for a lot of people.
I think Cialis is the best. Levitra, which I tried only once, didn't
do anything at all for me. Others have had good experience with it..
| |
|
| On Feb 2, 2:37 am, "Floppy" <floppynom...@everywhere.igo> wrote:
> Is there anyone here who has experience with both of these drugs? Did you
> note a better responce to one or the other?
>
> Are these drugs one of those things where YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary)?
>
> Thanks.
For me, Levitra is more reliable than Cialis, but it has to do with
dosing in my case. Cialis works very slowly for me. Takes 6 - 8 hrs
to kick in and requires a good deal of continuous physical stimulation
to maintain the erection, unless I sort of "stack" Cialis, taking it
every 48 hrs and regularly. But doing that, finally I'll get a bit
overdosed and have to back off.
Levitra works much more like Viaga on me. A little longer to kick in
than V (maybe ten minutes longer) but with the same vigorous
response. I find it lasts about 2 hours longer in effect than Viagra
does. Neither requires the amount of stimulation that Cialis does.
On V or L all I need is a mild breeze.
Jim
| |
| Floppy 2007-02-06, 9:36 pm |
|
"Jim" <avocet@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1170449576.077400.229390@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 2:37 am, "Floppy" <floppynom...@everywhere.igo> wrote:
you[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> For me, Levitra is more reliable than Cialis, but it has to do with
> dosing in my case. Cialis works very slowly for me. Takes 6 - 8 hrs
> to kick in and requires a good deal of continuous physical stimulation
> to maintain the erection, unless I sort of "stack" Cialis, taking it
> every 48 hrs and regularly. But doing that, finally I'll get a bit
> overdosed and have to back off.
>
> Levitra works much more like Viaga on me. A little longer to kick in
> than V (maybe ten minutes longer) but with the same vigorous
> response. I find it lasts about 2 hours longer in effect than Viagra
> does. Neither requires the amount of stimulation that Cialis does.
> On V or L all I need is a mild breeze.
>
> Jim
>
Viagra did nothing for me except give me a stuffy head and seeing everything
with a tint of blue.
Cialis on the other hand (no pun intended) seemed to have a delayed effect
much like you mentioned. The effect the 2nd day was often better than the
first day. I would like to have something that works a little quicker. I
can't plan two days in advance.
Regarding the 'mild breeze', when I was younger, my wife used to say all
that it took to get a response from me was for the dog to walk by and lick
my hand and I would be ready to go. Not so any more, takes a whole lot more
coaxing than it use to for a response.
| |
|
| On Feb 2, 3:04 pm, "Floppy" <floppynom...@everywhere.igo> wrote:
> "Jim" <avo...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1170449576.077400.229390@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> you
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Viagra did nothing for me except give me a stuffy head and seeing everything
> with a tint of blue.
>
> Cialis on the other hand (no pun intended) seemed to have a delayed effect
> much like you mentioned. The effect the 2nd day was often better than the
> first day. I would like to have something that works a little quicker. I
> can't plan two days in advance.
>
> Regarding the 'mild breeze', when I was younger, my wife used to say all
> that it took to get a response from me was for the dog to walk by and lick
> my hand and I would be ready to go. Not so any more, takes a whole lot more
> coaxing than it use to for a response.
_________
You need a larger dog, floppy. 
You don't mention Viagra. Have you tried that?
Jim
| |
|
|
"Jim" <avocet@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1170613456.555406.228850@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 3:04 pm, "Floppy" <floppynom...@everywhere.igo> wrote:
Did[vbcol=seagreen]
Vary)?[vbcol=seagreen]
everything[vbcol=seagreen]
effect[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
I[vbcol=seagreen]
lick[vbcol=seagreen]
more[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> _________
>
> You need a larger dog, floppy.
>
> You don't mention Viagra. Have you tried that?
>
> Jim
>
Hadn't thought of a larger dog but did consider one that could lick
faster...might hurry the response.
Re Viagra: The first sentence of my post: "Viagra did nothing for me except
give me a stuffy head and seeing everything
with a tint of blue."
| |
|
| On Feb 4, 8:57 am, "Newby" <nob...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> "Jim" <avo...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1170613456.555406.228850@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> Did
>
> Vary)?
>
>
>
>
>
> everything
>
> effect
> the
> I
>
> lick
> more
>
>
>
>
>
> Hadn't thought of a larger dog but did consider one that could lick
> faster...might hurry the response.
>
> Re Viagra: The first sentence of my post: "Viagra did nothing for me except
> give me a stuffy head and seeing everything
> with a tint of blue."
Sorry. I did miss that.
| |
| liuboalien83 2007-02-08, 4:47 am |
| Why don't you try some natural pills? There are no side effects at all. Just have a look:
Natural Viagra |
| |
|
|