| none@none.com 2007-01-10, 5:10 pm |
| My point was that I really thought it was fun. It didn't seem to go
through thus I posted again. I'm really sorry to have offended you or
anybody else. It was g good laugh for me and I though others might
enjoy it as I have. Over the many years (at least ten) that I've read
and participated in this group, a little levity has usually been
welcomed and appreciated.
What I posted was a binary and , since this is not a binary group, I
forwarned the reader. The first post did not go through entirely. I
never received the second post which made me think that it didn't go
through. Therefore, I used a different program which did go through.
Again, I'm sorry to have tweaked your hot button. The purpose was not
to offend or annoy.
Perhaps you should lighten up a bit and attempt to enjoy what you can.
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:00:18 GMT, Wanderer <unlisted@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:26:30 -0500, none@none.com wrote
>(in article <TPWdnTjmIMn7IeTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@giganews.com> ):
>
>
>Worth one look, maybe. Worth more than one, no. What is the point of your
>multiple postings of this not so hilarious image?
>
>Wanderer
|