Impotence Support - Never Forget That Albright And Clark (Cohen) Were Neocon Jews

Author

Never Forget That Albright And Clark (Cohen) Were Neocon Jews

Moishe

2006-06-04, 8:06 am

Scott McConnell
THE CONFORMIST

Clinton's War Crimes

"If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the
indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future."
So said Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, The New York Times, Feb.
22, 1998. It may be unfair to single out Albright, then contemplating
bombs over Baghdad, not Belgrade. Her qualities of mind permeate the
entire Clinton administration, and are expressed with equal zeal in the
neoconservative Weekly Standard and the liberal New Republic. As the
NATO campaign against Yugoslavia enters its ninth week it is worth
asking where this attitude has led the United States. Clinton
apologized for bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, though it was
instructive to see the Beltway press warriors rail against Beijing's
"orchestrated" anti-American demonstrations. Chinese-Americans I know
contrasted the demos with Clinton's response after two American
embassies were bombed last summer: He fired off volleys of cruise
missiles into the Sudan, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Two weeks ago
Washington finally acknowledged that one target it destroyed, a
pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, had no connection to Osama bin Laden,
the accused terrorist Clinton wanted to punish. Another intelligence
booboo, and what a shame for the people who worked there. At any rate,
we have apologized to the Chinese. The same day the U.S. bombed their
embassy, NATO planes hit a marketplace and a hospital in the city of
Nis, in southern Serbia, with antipersonnel cluster bombs, killing 15
and wounding 70. No apologies were tendered. But as bombing from 15,000
feet, firing cruise missiles from afar and hectoring nations who fail
to appreciate that we understand better than they how to manage their
internal affairs have become the hallmarks of the Clinton foreign
policy, they have begun to attract more critical attention. In a
stunning column in the May 7 London Times, Simon Jenkins surveyed the
damage NATO strikes have done to historic sites in Serbia and Kosovo.
Gen. Wesley Clark's bombers have destroyed the Banovina Palace in the
city center of Novi Sad, the finest work of art deco architecture in
the Balkans. They have battered the old city of Pec, destroying a
picturesque grouping of old markets and Turkish fortified houses dating
from the Ottoman period. They have ruined the old trade center in
nearby Djakovica and damaged the 16th-century Hadum Mosque there. They
have destroyed the medieval Vrsac Tower near the Romanian border, and
the 18th-century Tabacki Bridge. NATO planes have bombed repeatedly
around the renowned medieval church of Gracanica near Pristina, its
walls covered with 14th- and 15th-century frescoes. Deep fissures are
now reported in the frescoes, which are detaching from the walls. In
Belgrade, the 16th-century Rakovica monastery has taken a hit through
its roof; in Kursumlija, Clinton's bombs have struck the churches of
the Virgin and St. Nicholas, dating from the 12th century, as well as
St. Procopius' ninth-century church in Prokuplje. As Jenkins points
out, these sites date from the earliest years of Christianity in
Eastern Europe. NATO's response to the Serb refusal to give up its
Kosovo province has been to wage a civilizational war, to try to
demoralize an enemy by obliterating a cultural heritage. One can only
marvel at what must go on in the minds of Clinton, Albright, Gen. Clark
and the others: What-in this age of Littleton and The Jerry Springer
Show-makes them so certain that America "stands taller" and "sees
further"? Who do they think they are?

eniranjanrao@gmail.com

2006-06-04, 8:06 am

Moishe wrote:

> Scott McConnell
> THE CONFORMIST
>
> Clinton's War Crimes
>
> "If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the
> indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future."
> So said Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, The New York Times, Feb.
> 22, 1998. It may be unfair to single out Albright, then contemplating
> bombs over Baghdad, not Belgrade. Her qualities of mind permeate the
> entire Clinton administration, and are expressed with equal zeal in the
> neoconservative Weekly Standard and the liberal New Republic. As the
> NATO campaign against Yugoslavia enters its ninth week it is worth
> asking where this attitude has led the United States. Clinton
> apologized for bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, though it was
> instructive to see the Beltway press warriors rail against Beijing's
> "orchestrated" anti-American demonstrations. Chinese-Americans I know
> contrasted the demos with Clinton's response after two American
> embassies were bombed last summer: He fired off volleys of cruise
> missiles into the Sudan, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Two weeks ago
> Washington finally acknowledged that one target it destroyed, a
> pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, had no connection to Osama bin Laden,
> the accused terrorist Clinton wanted to punish. Another intelligence
> booboo, and what a shame for the people who worked there. At any rate,
> we have apologized to the Chinese. The same day the U.S. bombed their
> embassy, NATO planes hit a marketplace and a hospital in the city of
> Nis, in southern Serbia, with antipersonnel cluster bombs, killing 15
> and wounding 70. No apologies were tendered. But as bombing from 15,000
> feet, firing cruise missiles from afar and hectoring nations who fail
> to appreciate that we understand better than they how to manage their
> internal affairs have become the hallmarks of the Clinton foreign
> policy, they have begun to attract more critical attention. In a
> stunning column in the May 7 London Times, Simon Jenkins surveyed the
> damage NATO strikes have done to historic sites in Serbia and Kosovo.
> Gen. Wesley Clark's bombers have destroyed the Banovina Palace in the
> city center of Novi Sad, the finest work of art deco architecture in
> the Balkans. They have battered the old city of Pec, destroying a
> picturesque grouping of old markets and Turkish fortified houses dating
> from the Ottoman period. They have ruined the old trade center in
> nearby Djakovica and damaged the 16th-century Hadum Mosque there. They
> have destroyed the medieval Vrsac Tower near the Romanian border, and
> the 18th-century Tabacki Bridge. NATO planes have bombed repeatedly
> around the renowned medieval church of Gracanica near Pristina, its
> walls covered with 14th- and 15th-century frescoes. Deep fissures are
> now reported in the frescoes, which are detaching from the walls. In
> Belgrade, the 16th-century Rakovica monastery has taken a hit through
> its roof; in Kursumlija, Clinton's bombs have struck the churches of
> the Virgin and St. Nicholas, dating from the 12th century, as well as
> St. Procopius' ninth-century church in Prokuplje. As Jenkins points
> out, these sites date from the earliest years of Christianity in
> Eastern Europe. NATO's response to the Serb refusal to give up its
> Kosovo province has been to wage a civilizational war, to try to
> demoralize an enemy by obliterating a cultural heritage. One can only
> marvel at what must go on in the minds of Clinton, Albright, Gen. Clark
> and the others: What-in this age of Littleton and The Jerry Springer
> Show-makes them so certain that America "stands taller" and "sees
> further"? Who do they think they are?

Scotius

2006-06-07, 2:23 am

On 3 Jun 2006 22:54:48 -0700, "Moishe" <xyz100@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>Scott McConnell
>THE CONFORMIST
>
>Clinton's War Crimes
>
>"If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the
>indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future."
>So said Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, The New York Times, Feb.
>22, 1998. It may be unfair to single out Albright, then contemplating
>bombs over Baghdad, not Belgrade. Her qualities of mind permeate the
>entire Clinton administration, and are expressed with equal zeal in the
>neoconservative Weekly Standard and the liberal New Republic. As the
>NATO campaign against Yugoslavia enters its ninth week it is worth
>asking where this attitude has led the United States. Clinton
>apologized for bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, though it was
>instructive to see the Beltway press warriors rail against Beijing's
>"orchestrated" anti-American demonstrations. Chinese-Americans I know
>contrasted the demos with Clinton's response after two American
>embassies were bombed last summer: He fired off volleys of cruise
>missiles into the Sudan, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Two weeks ago
>Washington finally acknowledged that one target it destroyed, a
>pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, had no connection to Osama bin Laden,
>the accused terrorist Clinton wanted to punish. Another intelligence
>booboo, and what a shame for the people who worked there. At any rate,
>we have apologized to the Chinese. The same day the U.S. bombed their
>embassy, NATO planes hit a marketplace and a hospital in the city of
>Nis, in southern Serbia, with antipersonnel cluster bombs, killing 15
>and wounding 70. No apologies were tendered. But as bombing from 15,000
>feet, firing cruise missiles from afar and hectoring nations who fail
>to appreciate that we understand better than they how to manage their
>internal affairs have become the hallmarks of the Clinton foreign
>policy, they have begun to attract more critical attention. In a
>stunning column in the May 7 London Times, Simon Jenkins surveyed the
>damage NATO strikes have done to historic sites in Serbia and Kosovo.
>Gen. Wesley Clark's bombers have destroyed the Banovina Palace in the
>city center of Novi Sad, the finest work of art deco architecture in
>the Balkans. They have battered the old city of Pec, destroying a
>picturesque grouping of old markets and Turkish fortified houses dating
>from the Ottoman period. They have ruined the old trade center in
>nearby Djakovica and damaged the 16th-century Hadum Mosque there. They
>have destroyed the medieval Vrsac Tower near the Romanian border, and
>the 18th-century Tabacki Bridge. NATO planes have bombed repeatedly
>around the renowned medieval church of Gracanica near Pristina, its
>walls covered with 14th- and 15th-century frescoes. Deep fissures are
>now reported in the frescoes, which are detaching from the walls. In
>Belgrade, the 16th-century Rakovica monastery has taken a hit through
>its roof; in Kursumlija, Clinton's bombs have struck the churches of
>the Virgin and St. Nicholas, dating from the 12th century, as well as
>St. Procopius' ninth-century church in Prokuplje. As Jenkins points
>out, these sites date from the earliest years of Christianity in
>Eastern Europe. NATO's response to the Serb refusal to give up its
>Kosovo province has been to wage a civilizational war, to try to
>demoralize an enemy by obliterating a cultural heritage. One can only
>marvel at what must go on in the minds of Clinton, Albright, Gen. Clark
>and the others: What-in this age of Littleton and The Jerry Springer
>Show-makes them so certain that America "stands taller" and "sees
>further"? Who do they think they are?

Neocon Jews? Okay. I won't forget that. Now about you...