|
Home > Archive > Impotence Support > May 2005 > Retarded ejaculation/male anorgasmia
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Retarded ejaculation/male anorgasmia
|
|
| vigo1964@aol.com 2005-05-29, 10:48 pm |
| I am completing a masters degree in psychotherapy and as part of my
research I would like to talk to men who experience retarded
ejaculation/ partner anorgasmia, i.e. difficulty or inability to reach
orgasm with a sexual partner. Typically, such men have no problem
masturbating to climax and there is no organic cause of the difficulty.
In my research, I am simply looking to describe subjective experience -
how sex feels, how masturbation feels, how the individual feels about
himself, his partners, whether or not he experiences it as a problem
etc.
I will need to quote and summarise, but all information given will
remain anonymous and privacy respected. If anyone wants to respond to
this, I will give you more information. I am in London for face-to-face
interviews or we can communicate by phone, Internet etc.
Vigo
| |
| Norton 2005-05-29, 10:48 pm |
| In soc.sexuality.general vigo1964@aol.com wrote:
>I am completing a masters degree in psychotherapy and as part of my
>research I would like to talk to men who experience retarded
>ejaculation/ partner anorgasmia, i.e. difficulty or inability to reach
>orgasm with a sexual partner. Typically, such men have no problem
>masturbating to climax and there is no organic cause of the difficulty.
>In my research, I am simply looking to describe subjective experience -
>how sex feels, how masturbation feels, how the individual feels about
>himself, his partners, whether or not he experiences it as a problem
>etc.
>I will need to quote and summarise, but all information given will
>remain anonymous and privacy respected. If anyone wants to respond to
>this, I will give you more information. I am in London for face-to-face
>interviews or we can communicate by phone, Internet etc.
>Vigo
We get a number of similar requests from people who
are not _bone fide_ researchers.
I'd suggest that if you are, you provide data that would
allow potential interviewees to check on you, your university
affiliation, etc. And provide that up front in a way that
can be checked.
As it stands there is no way to tell.
Norton.
| |
| The Dave 2005-05-30, 8:49 am |
| In message <d7dum1$2u4$8@reader1.panix.com> Norton <norton@nyc.rr.com>
wrote:
>In soc.sexuality.general vigo1964@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>We get a number of similar requests from people who
>are not _bone fide_ researchers.
>
>I'd suggest that if you are, you provide data that would
>allow potential interviewees to check on you, your university
>affiliation, etc. And provide that up front in a way that
>can be checked.
>
>As it stands there is no way to tell.
Agreed -- The aol.com address doesn't inspire confidence, don't
universities give students email addresses these days?
On the other hand, what's the goal of someone who isn't doing research
to be published, and what's the harm if they get some information
anyway?
| |
| vigo1964@aol.com 2005-05-30, 8:49 am |
| As I said in my original posting, anyone who wants to contact me will
be given more information and this will include the information that
Norton suggests. Those who would like to work with me on this project
will first be given a detailed participant release agreement which will
explain the nature and purpose of the research, the way in which their
input will be used and which will require their written consent. In
addition, any participant can withdraw from the research at any time
they want. I am working within the ethical guidelines of UPCA
(Universities Psychotherapy & Counselling Association) and of the BPS
(British Psychological Society).
About the e-mail address - I never thought about that.
| |
| vigo1964@aol.com 2005-05-30, 8:49 am |
| As`I said in my original posting, anyone who thinks they would like to
work with me on this will be given further information, including the
information that Norton suggests, before any interviews etc. take
place. There will also be a written consent form which will explain the
nature and purpose of the research and the use to which participants'
material will be used. I am working within the ethical guidelines of
the UPCA (Universities Psychotherapy & Counselling Association) and the
BPS (British Psychological Society).
About the e-mail - I never thought of that.
| |
| Norton 2005-05-30, 5:49 pm |
| In soc.sexuality.general The Dave <somecalgaryguy@gmail.com> wrote:
>In message <d7dum1$2u4$8@reader1.panix.com> Norton <norton@nyc.rr.com>
>wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Agreed -- The aol.com address doesn't inspire confidence, don't
>universities give students email addresses these days?
Yes. And there are usually web pages for such projects on
a university-owned computer.
>On the other hand, what's the goal of someone who isn't doing research
>to be published, and what's the harm if they get some information
>anyway?
Possibly none. On the other hand you might be supplying
somebody with whack-off material (that's fine with me as
long as you are aware of it) and the possibility of further
contacts that you do NOT want.
Norton.
| |
| Elizabeth 2005-05-31, 8:47 am |
|
vigo1964@aol.com wrote:
> As I said in my original posting, anyone who wants to contact me will
> be given more information and this will include the information that
> Norton suggests. Those who would like to work with me on this project
> will first be given a detailed participant release agreement which will
> explain the nature and purpose of the research, the way in which their
> input will be used and which will require their written consent. In
> addition, any participant can withdraw from the research at any time
> they want. I am working within the ethical guidelines of UPCA
> (Universities Psychotherapy & Counselling Association) and of the BPS
> (British Psychological Society).
Yes, but which university are you doing the research for.
>
> About the e-mail address - I never thought about that.
The point is, if you really were university based and the research was
as part of a university project you would automatically use the
university email address - rather than a private address.
| |
| The Dave 2005-05-31, 8:47 am |
| In message <1117509597.478638.95160@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Elizabeth" <eli_abet@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>vigo1964@aol.com wrote:
>
>The point is, if you really were university based and the research was
>as part of a university project you would automatically use the
>university email address - rather than a private address.
Perhaps, perhaps not. I do technical support for mail server admins
purchasing our product.
Licensing starts at $110, but a significant percentage of our users have
the $4000 package, and let they still use hotmail addresses when
contacting support.
I've never grasped why, but a lot of people have a phobia about using
their "business" address even for actual company business, but yet have
no problem using their business address for jokes and other personal
stuff.
*shrugs*
People are weird.
|
| |
|
|