|
Home > Archive > Impotence Support > February 2005 > God wants men to be impotent ! ! !
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
God wants men to be impotent ! ! !
|
|
| Dan Simper 2005-02-07, 8:11 am |
| If your willy is dead, it should be dead ! God wanted it to be dead !
If you interfere and try to revive "him", you are against GOD and will
burn in HELL !
| |
| Sam E. Sung 2005-02-07, 8:11 am |
| Please quote chapter and verse, otherwise you are pumping
sunshine up someones rear end.
Sam
"Dan Simper" <pain_wheels@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fbbaa058.0502042130.5172d730@posting.google.com...
> If your willy is dead, it should be dead ! God wanted it to be dead !
> If you interfere and try to revive "him", you are against GOD and will
> burn in HELL !
| |
|
| On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:23:34 GMT, "Sam E. Sung" <sam.sung@samsung.kr> wrote:
>Please quote chapter and verse, otherwise you are pumping
>sunshine up someones rear end.
>Sam
>
No problem! Genesis Chapter 5, verse 3:
"Adam was 130 years old when he begot a son in his likeness, after his image;
and he named him Seth."
There are several other cases mentioned where old guys (and gals) did the
nasty well in to their dotage.
God wants us to keep it up.
---
Remove the "NS" for email address.
| |
| Sam E. Sung 2005-02-07, 8:11 am |
| Then why do you say that God wants men to be impotent? If they
father children into their old age, they have to be potent to do that.
Sam
"Bob-S" <NSBob-S@att.net> wrote in message
news:huo90193hc0e8c1a3sktsdu4pfssunmihh@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:23:34 GMT, "Sam E. Sung" <sam.sung@samsung.kr>
> wrote:
>
> No problem! Genesis Chapter 5, verse 3:
>
> "Adam was 130 years old when he begot a son in his likeness, after his
> image;
> and he named him Seth."
>
> There are several other cases mentioned where old guys (and gals) did the
> nasty well in to their dotage.
>
> God wants us to keep it up.
>
> ---
> Remove the "NS" for email address.
| |
| c palmer 2005-02-07, 8:11 am |
|
From: pain_wheels@hotmail.com (Dan=A0Simper)
If your willy is dead, it should be dead ! God wanted it to be dead ! If
you interfere and try to revive "him", you are against GOD and will burn
in HELL !
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
your brain is dead, it should be dead for trying to think or did you
just get the urge to grunt and push out a brain fart, If you interfere
and try to revive "your brain" after shuting down all thoughts, you are
against GOD and will burn in HELL, and may you burn hot ..........
you know.....trolls are quite tasty, but a little crunchy after roasting
on an open fire.....
~ c
| |
| Just A Guy 2005-02-09, 2:59 pm |
| Actually, I tend to agree with the original poster.
Well, he stated it in a crack-pot troll kind of way, but I believe that
ED is a normal part of natural aging.
I don't know if I'm stating the obvious, but I have a feeling someone is
going to disagree with me, so I'll support my contention:
First of all, I suspect that all men develop age related ED. Everything
else goes, why shouldn't your dick also? Many old guys say their dicks
work as well as when they were 20. I think that's bs. I've known several
men like that. Eventually they try some Viagra; suddenly they remember
what a good stiffy is all about!
There is another argument too: women. There fertility usually ends in
their 40s. It would not be remarkable for a similar effect to be seen in
men. Is it really useful for the perpetuation of the species and the
rearing of children to have very old men impregnating women?
Now, I'm NOT saying we shouldn't take V or C. I believe in wearing
glasses if you're near-sighted, and taking blood pressure meds if
needed, and I see nothing wrong with a little V once in awhile, but
yeah, I think age related impotence in natural, and some would say, what
God intended.
| |
| ernestnolan 2005-02-09, 2:59 pm |
| Hi,
I agree us old guys shouldn't be getting our wives pregnant when we can't
raise the kids.
The wife and I found we were unable to have orgasms after we got older
because the amount of friction just wasn't enough anymore. Nerves were
becoming less sensitive.
If we did it without lubrication then the skin would get raw but we could
still make it. So we stopped intercouse, but masturbation was still possible
for both of us.
After several years the wife even lost that and the strongest vibrator just
couldn't do it anymore.
She was really ticked off at God for taking one of her most enjoyable
activities in life away. That doesn't cause unwanted kids so why couldn't
God's planing have been a little better to allow recreational masturbation
to continue till whenever.........?
Ooooh well.
ernestnolan
"Just A Guy" <amomynous@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:25316-420796A1-263@storefull-3137.bay.webtv.net...
> Actually, I tend to agree with the original poster.
> Well, he stated it in a crack-pot troll kind of way, but I believe that
> ED is a normal part of natural aging.
>
> I don't know if I'm stating the obvious, but I have a feeling someone is
> going to disagree with me, so I'll support my contention:
>
> First of all, I suspect that all men develop age related ED. Everything
> else goes, why shouldn't your dick also? Many old guys say their dicks
> work as well as when they were 20. I think that's bs. I've known several
> men like that. Eventually they try some Viagra; suddenly they remember
> what a good stiffy is all about!
>
> There is another argument too: women. There fertility usually ends in
> their 40s. It would not be remarkable for a similar effect to be seen in
> men. Is it really useful for the perpetuation of the species and the
> rearing of children to have very old men impregnating women?
>
> Now, I'm NOT saying we shouldn't take V or C. I believe in wearing
> glasses if you're near-sighted, and taking blood pressure meds if
> needed, and I see nothing wrong with a little V once in awhile, but
> yeah, I think age related impotence in natural, and some would say, what
> God intended.
>
| |
| Horís Onomá 2005-02-09, 2:59 pm |
| Just A Guy wrote:
> Is it really useful for the perpetuation of the species and the
> rearing of children to have very old men impregnating women?
It depends. If you're old, sick, dumb and poor, it's certainly not useful.
But intelligence, power and wealth (even an old man's) are indeed
beneficial for the perpetuation of the species and the rearing of
children.
Although the more romantically inclined might not like the idea, the
instinctive mating preferences of many women support it very much.
|
| |
|
|